"No" to Star Wars
I am opposed to premature deployment of a national missile defense
system before the continental United States faces a real threat.
Such premature deployment would divert money from more pressing
needs: readiness, theater missile defense, and force modernization.
. . . I believe our current research and development program,
which will allow us to begin deployment before the turn of the
century, is adequate. We are seeking congressional support for
our program and schedule. I will resist congressional attempts
to accelerate our prudent schedule. I will also resist deployment
of space-based interceptors, which would be a costly diversion
of funds from the threats we face today.
William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense, in a February 15,
1995, official statement regarding an attempt by congressional
Republicans to compel near-term deployment of a national missile
defense system.
Clanks in the Ranks
Rep. Curt Weldon, Pennsylvania Republican, was spotted sporting
the flags of three nations on his lapel-Bangladesh, Guatemala,
and Nepal.
Where was the Stars and Stripes? The Clinton Administration,
explained Mr. Weldon, using Defense Department dollars, is currently
paying full salaries, housing costs, and benefits for troops
from Bangladesh, Guatemala, and Nepal while they are stationed
in Haiti.
"At the same time," he pointed out, "600 troops
from the 2d Armored Division of Fort Hood, Tex., had to conduct
ten training exercises in the range, walking together pretending
they were in tanks because we do not have enough money for fuel
and maintenance.
"The new slogan of that battalion of 600 troops,"
he disclosed, "is to march together and say, 'Clank, clank,
I'm a tank.' "
The Washington [D. C.] Times, February 22, 1995, in the
"Inside the Beltway" department.
Smaller Than McDonald's
That America's defense industrial base is becoming increasingly
tenuous is becoming increasingly evident. The major firms making
up that industry sell at a thirty percent discount to the S&P
500 index, and the discount was closer to eighty percent until
a few mergers raised hopes that part of the industry might yet
survive and prove viable. The combined market value of the top
four aerospace firms is less than that of McDonald's, meaning
that Big Macs and Egg McMuffins are judged by the market to have
greater immediate reward than stealth aircraft and "smart"
weapons.
Norman R. Augustine, chairman and CEO of Martin Marietta,
in January 19, 1995, remarks to the House National Security Committee.
Doctor Luttwak Is In
"Jointness" is the virus that gives you the acquired
strategic deficiency syndrome.
Defense analyst Edward N. Luttwak, in January 17, 1995,
remarks to an AFA symposium in Washington, D. C.
A Theoretical Alternative
There was an alternative-a theoretical alternative-of going in
and taking out the [North Korean] nuclear reactor. We considered
that option. We looked very carefully at what would be required
to do that.
Secretary of Defense Perry in January 24, 1995, testimony
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, revealing that
the US last spring seriously examined and then rejected taking
military action against North Korea's nuclear weapons program.
$65 Billion, Maybe More
CBO has concluded that the Administration's planned force
structure, level of operations, and modernization programs are
likely to cost about $65 billion more than the funding provided
in the FYDP [Future Years Defense Program], which translates
into a shortfall of about five percent for the 19951999
period. That calculation takes into account only those factors
that have already changed or those risks that are likely to occur.
. . . If CBO includes factors that are less certain, DoD's shortfall
could be more than $100 billion . . . through 1999, or about
nine percent of planned funding.
The Congressional Budget Office, in a January 1995 report,
"An Analysis of the Administration's Future Years Defense
Program for 1995 Through 1999."
What the CIA Sees Ahead
Crisis warning will continue to prove critical in operations
other than a classic war scenario, such as the 1991 Gulf War.
We estimate that threats to peace stemming from ethnic, religious,
or national conflicts can flare up in more than thirty countries
over the next two years.
R. James Woolsey, then CIA director, in January 10, 1995,
testimony presenting the CIA's worldwide threat assessment to
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
The Peace Powers Act
A major provision is section five of the bill, which . . . [would]
prohibit the President from placing any element of the US armed
forces under the command or operational control of any foreign
national in any UN peacekeeping operation. This is a matter that
commands strong support [from] the American public, who do not
want to see our service personnel placed willy-nilly under the
control of non-Americans, exposed to dangers in operations that
may have little if any relation to American interests. . . .
As President Clinton has shown himself more and more willing
to delegate his Constitutional power to international bureaucrats
at the United Nations, the wisdom of this prohibition has become
more and more apparent.
Sen. Don Nickles (R-Okla.), cosponsor of the Peace Powers
Act of 1995, in a January 5, 1995, floor speech about the bill's
major provisions.
Copyright by Air Force Association.
All rights reserved
|