George J. Tenet, as
the director of central intelligence, is the head of the Intelligence
Community. On Feb. 11, he delivered to the Senate Armed Services
Committee his annual threat briefing. What follows are excerpts
from his prepared statement, “The Worldwide Threat in 2003:
Evolving Dangers in a Complex World.”
Al Qaeda’s “Expectation”
“ The threat from al Qaeda remains. ... The
network is extensive and adaptable. It will take years
of determined effort to unravel this and other terrorist
networks and stamp them out. ...
“ Al Qaeda is still dedicated to striking the
US homeland. ... Until al Qaeda finds an opportunity
for the big attack, it will try to maintain its operational
tempo by striking ‘softer’ targets, ...
those targets al Qaeda planners may view as less well-protected.
“ Al Qaeda has also sharpened its focus on our
allies in Europe and on operations against Israeli
and Jewish targets. ...
“ Al Qaeda is also developing or refining new
means of attack, including use of surface-to-air missiles,
poisons, and air, surface, and underwater methods to
attack maritime targets. ...
“ The bottom line here, ... is that al Qaeda
is living in the expectation of resuming the offensive.”
Toward Mass-Murder Weapons
“ Al Qaeda still seeks chemical, biological,
radiological, and nuclear weapons. The recently disrupted
poison plots in the UK, France, and Spain reflect a
broad, orchestrated effort by al Qaeda and associated
groups to attack several targets using toxins and explosives.
These planned attacks involved similar materials, and
the implicated operatives had links to one another.
...
“ Bin Laden has a sophisticated BW capability.
In Afghanistan, al Qaeda succeeded in acquiring both
the expertise and the equipment needed to grow biological
agents. ...
“ Last year I also discussed al Qaeda’s
efforts to obtain nuclear and radiological materials
as part of an ambitious nuclear agenda. One year later,
we continue to follow every lead in tracking terrorist
efforts to obtain nuclear materials. In particular,
we continue to follow up on information that al Qaeda
seeks to produce or purchase a radiological dispersal
device. Construction of such a device is well within
al Qaeda capabilities—if it can obtain the radiological
material.”
The Search for Safe Havens
“ Al Qaeda’s loss of Afghanistan, the
death and capture of key personnel, and its year spent
mostly on the run have impaired its capability, complicated
its command and control, and disrupted its logistics.
...
“ Al Qaeda will try to adapt to changing circumstances
as it regroups. It will seek a more secure base area
so that it can pause from flight and resume planning.
We place no limitations on our expectations of what
al Qaeda might do to survive.
“ We see disturbing signs that al Qaeda has
established a presence in both Iran and Iraq. In addition,
we are also concerned that al Qaeda continues to find
refuge in the hinterlands of Pakistan and Afghanistan.”
Watching the No-Law Zones
“ [The US faces] challenges such as the world’s
vast stretches of ungoverned areas—lawless zones,
veritable ‘no-man’s-lands’ like some
areas along the Afghan–Pakistani border—where
extremist movements find shelter and can win breathing
space to grow. ...
“ We know from the events of Sept. 11 that we
can never again ignore a specific type of country:
a country unable to control its own borders and internal
territory, lacking the capacity to govern, educate
its people, or provide fundamental social services.
Such countries can, however, offer extremists a place
to congregate in relative safety
.“ Al Qaeda is already a presence in several
regions that arouse our concern. The Bali attack brought
the threat home to Southeast Asia, where the emergence
of Jemaah Islamiya in Indonesia and elsewhere in the
region is particularly worrisome. And the Mombasa attack
in East Africa highlights the continued vulnerability
of Western interests and the growing terrorist threat
there.”
Wartime Successes
“ We are having success on many fronts. More
than one-third of the top al Qaeda leadership identified
before the war has been killed or captured. ... The
number of rounded-up al Qaeda detainees has now grown
to over 3,000—up from 1,000 or so when I testified
last year—and the number of countries involved
in these captures has almost doubled to more than 100.
...
“ [T]he worldwide rousting of al Qaeda has definitely
disrupted its operations. And we’ve obtained
a trove of information we’re using to prosecute
the hunt still further. ...
“ Combined US and allied efforts thwarted a
number of al Qaeda–related attacks in the past
year, including the European poison plots. We identified,
monitored, and arrested Jose Padilla, an al Qaeda operative
who was allegedly planning operations in the United
States and was seeking to develop a so-called ‘dirty
bomb.’ And along with Moroccan partners we disrupted
al Qaeda attacks against US and British warships in
the Straits of Gibraltar.”
Help From the Muslim World
“ Muslim governments today better understand
the threat al Qaeda poses to them and day by day have
been increasing their support.
“ Ever since Pakistan’s decision to sever
ties with the Taliban, ... Islamabad’s close
cooperation in the war on terrorism has resulted in
the capture of key al Qaeda lieutenants and significant
disruption of its regional network. Jordan and Egypt
have been courageous leaders in the war on terrorism.
A number of Gulf states like the United Arab Emirates
are denying terrorists financial safe haven, making
it harder for al Qaeda to funnel funding for operations.
Others in the Gulf are beginning to tackle the problem
of charities that front for, or fund, terrorism.
“ The Saudis are providing increasingly important
support to our counterterrorism efforts—from
arrests to sharing debriefing results.
“ Southeast Asian countries like Malaysia and Indonesia, with majority
Muslim populations, have been active in arresting and detaining terror suspects.”
“ New World” of Nuclear Peril
“ For 60 years, weapon-design information and
technologies for producing fissile material—the
key hurdles for nuclear weapons production—have
been the domain of only a few states. These states,
though a variety of self-regulating and treaty based
regimes, generally limited the spread of these data
and technologies.
“ In my view, we have entered a new world of
proliferation. In the vanguard of this new world are
knowledgeable nonstate purveyors of WMD materials and
technology. Such nonstate outlets are increasingly
capable of providing technology and equipment that
previously could only be supplied by countries with
established capabilities. ...
“ With the assistance of proliferators, a potentially
wider range of countries may be able to develop nuclear
weapons by ‘leapfrogging’ the incremental
pace of weapons programs in other countries.”
Market for Nukes
“ The example of new nuclear states that seem
able to deter threats from more powerful states, simply
by brandishing nuclear weaponry, will resonate deeply
among other countries that want to enter the nuclear
weapons club.
“ Demand creates the market. The desire for nuclear weapons is on the upsurge.
Additional countries may decide to seek nuclear weapons as it becomes clear their
neighbors and regional rivals are already doing so. The ‘domino theory’ of
the 21st century may well be nuclear.”
Biological Threats
“ Biological warfare programs have become more
technically sophisticated as a result of rapid growth
in the field of biotechnology research and wide dissemination
of this knowledge. Almost anyone with limited skills
can create BW agents. The rise of such capabilities
also means we now have to be concerned about a myriad
of new agents
.“ Countries are more and more tightly integrating
both their BW and CW production capabilities into apparently
legitimate commercial infrastructures, further concealing
them from scrutiny."
The Missile Problem
“ In addition to the longstanding [missile]
threats from Russian and Chinese missile forces, the
United States faces a near-term ICBM threat from North
Korea. And over the next several years, we could face
a similar threat from Iran and possibly Iraq.
“ Short- and medium-range missiles already pose
a significant threat to US interests, military forces,
and allies as emerging missile states increase the
range, reliability, and accuracy of the missile systems
in their inventories.
“ Several countries of concern remain interested in acquiring a land-attack
cruise missile capability. By the end of the decade, LACMs could pose a serious
threat to not only our deployed forces but possibly even the US mainland.”
Missile Proliferators
“ North Korea ... continues to export complete
ballistic missiles and production capabilities along
with related raw materials, components, and expertise.
Profits from these sales help Pyongyang to support
its missile and other WMD development programs and,
in turn, generate new products to offer to its customers.
...
“ China vowed in November 2000 to refrain from
assisting countries seeking to develop nuclear-capable
ballistic missiles, and, last August, Beijing promulgated
new missile-related export controls. Despite such steps,
Chinese firms remain key suppliers of ballistic- and
cruise missile–related technologies to Pakistan,
Iran, and several other countries. ...
“ We are also monitoring Russian transfers of
technology and expertise. Russian entities have cooperated
on projects—many of them dual-use—that
we assess can contribute to BW, CW, nuclear, or ballistic-
and cruise-missile programs in several countries of
concern, including Iran.”
Copyright Air Force Association. All rightsreserved.
|