American
Forces Commence Operations in Iraq
March 20, 2003—President Bush told the nation at
10:16 p.m. on March 19 (5:16 a.m., March 20, Persian Gulf time)
that US and coalition forces had gone into action against selected
military targets in Iraq.
He said, “We will accept no outcome but victory.”
In the predawn strikes, US Air Force F-117 radar-evading fighters
dropped GPS–guided 2,000-pound bombs, and US Navy ships fired
cruise missiles on at least three targets in Baghdad where intelligence
indicated senior Iraqi leaders were present
.The US called the action Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Full coverage of the war will appear in next month’s issue.—the
editors
USAF Triggers Stop-Loss
The Air Force on March 14 announced it had implemented Stop-Loss
to retain personnel in certain career fields. The action is effective
on May 2.
In this second use of Stop-Loss since the 9/11 terrorist attacks,
USAF has listed 43 officer and 56 enlisted specialties “critical”
to the service’s ability to conduct operations. The action
affects active duty, Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve Command
personnel.
US Beefs Up Bombers for Korean Crisis
Administration officials on March 5 said the US was sending USAF
B-52s and B-1B bombers to Guam to be within easy striking distance
of North Korea, should diplomacy fail.
The deployment order was not tied to a March 2 incident in which
four North Korean fighter aircraft intercepted a USAF RC-135S Cobra
Ball aircraft flying in international airspace. Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld had issued the order days earlier in what Administration
officials said was a realignment of forces to offset the buildup
in Southwest Asia.
The North Korean aircraft came within 50 feet of the unarmed USAF
reconnaissance aircraft, but they did not “acquire”
or lock on to the US aircraft, as early reports had indicated. It
is the first such incident since the North Koreans shot down a Navy
EC-121 surveillance aircraft, killing 31 Americans, in 1969.
President Bush has maintained that diplomacy will work to restrain
North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. The movement of the
bombers, officials said, serves as insurance against opportunistic
moves by North Korea.
Charleston Workload Soars
The amount of cargo passing through Charleston AFB, S.C., on its
way to Southwest Asia skyrocketed after two cargo processing buildings
at Dover AFB, Del., collapsed under heavy snow in late February.
USAF estimated a 250 percent increase for some Charleston units.
The 437th Aerial Port Squadron members normally process five to
seven truckloads each day. That grew to more than 70 trucks a day
as Air Mobility Command shifted the flow from Delaware to South
Carolina. With about 150 squadron members deployed overseas, the
unit had to call for help from other active duty and reservist aerial
port specialists around the country.
Officials said the work was also nonstop for other Charleston units—security
forces to search the trucks, logistics readiness to unload them,
and transportation to keep forklifts and other equipment running—as
base personnel prepared the cargo for commercial airlift to a forward
operating location.
USAF Tests 21K Bomb
The Air Force on March 11 announced it had tested a 21,500-pound
precision guided munition at the Air Armament Center’s western
test range in Florida. A C-130 dropped the bomb, called the Massive
Ordnance Air Blast weapon.
USAF said it is the largest conventional bomb in existence. It
outstrips the 15,000-pound “Daisy Cutter,” or BLU-82
bomb, used in Afghanistan against al Qaeda and Taliban forces hiding
in caves. The Daisy Cutter, which can obliterate anything within
hundreds of yards, serves as a tremendous psychological weapon,
as well.
The Air Force Research Lab began the MOAB project in Fiscal 2002
and is expected to complete the program this year.
Aircrews Hit No-Fly Zone Threats
Coalition aircrews enforcing the no-fly zones in Iraq on March
14 struck a mobile radar system that Iraq forces had moved into
the southern no-fly zone in violation of UN resolutions, said US
Central Command.
It was the second such movement by Iraq in two days. CENTCOM officials
said that Iraqi mobile anti-aircraft systems remain a threat to
coalition aircraft. Iraq has targeted air patrols in both the southern
and northern no-fly zones.
When Iraqi anti-aircraft artillery fired on coalition aircraft
on March 10, CENTCOM directed strikes against three unmanned, underground
military communications sites.
Gen. Richard B. Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on
March 11 told reporters that patrols had been stepped up to keep
the pressure on Saddam Hussein. “We are now flying several
hundred sorties a day, with 200 or 300 over the southern no-fly
zone,” said Myers.
Leaflet Drop Reaches 12 Million
US Central Command on March 17 reported that coalition aircraft
had dropped more than 1.4 million informational leaflets into western
and southern Iraq that day, raising the year’s total to 12
million.
The leaflets have a variety of messages directed at Iraqi military
members and civilians. One of the March 17 messages told Iraqi civilians
that they could be the victims if Saddam Hussein uses chemical weapons.
Another encouraged Iraqi military members not to use weapons of
mass destruction. Some leaflets provide information on how to tune
into coalition radio broadcasts.
Iraqi Forces Defecting?
US intelligence sources in northern Iraq said in late February
that dozens of Iraqi military members had defected since the first
of the year. Many more are preparing and hiding white flags of surrender.
The Washington Times reported that two of the defectors revealed
that morale was low and much of their equipment defective. One said
his division was “at about 25 percent effectiveness and most
soldiers were hiding their white flags,” according to the
Times.
USAF Expands Deployment Force
The Air Force has increased the number of personnel in its deployment
pool to 75 percent of the force. That represents a growth of nearly
100,000 people in just the past year, according to Maj. Gen. Timothy
A. Peppe, special assistant for air and space expeditionary forces.
Although this means the service has identified 269,000 deployment
positions, said Peppe, there still are not enough individuals in
certain specialties.
“ Most of this increased deployment capability is in associate
unit type codes, so they’re not primary deployers,”
said Peppe. The increase came largely from staffs at USAF, major
commands, direct reporting units, and field operating agencies.
Their inclusion in the deployment pool, he said, does help spread
the “pain.” The Air Force now exempts from deployment
only select career fields and positions, such as ROTC staff members,
many instructors, recruiters, space operators, missile crews, and
missile security professionals.
Westover Surges for Gulf Buildup
Within hours of receiving word that C-5 aircraft loaded with troops
and equipment bound for the Persian Gulf were on their way, Air
Force Reserve Command’s 439th Airlift Wing at Westover ARB,
Mass., set up 24-hour operations to gas and inspect the aircraft
and feed the troops—normally a four-hour job per aircraft.
As it did for the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Westover serves as a key
air bridge for US forces deploying to Southwest Asia. AFRC officials
said that since Westover started its 24-hour operations Feb. 2,
the base had processed 375 aircraft, primarily C-5s and C-130s,
and pumped more than 3.3 million gallons of JP-8 fuel. It has also
handled 2,571 passengers and more than 8.5 million pounds of cargo.
AFRC Extends Air Bridge
More than half of the 10,000 Air Force Reserve Command personnel
who have been mobilized serve as a major span in the US air bridge
moving troops, equipment, and cargo to Southwest Asia.
Air Mobility Command planners began staging C-5 and C-130 aircraft
through Westover ARB, Mass., in early February. (See “Westover
Surges for Gulf Buildup,” above.) AFRC’s 445th Airlift
Wing, Wright–Patterson AFB, Ohio, serves as the staging point
for AFRC C-141 missions.
In addition, other AFRC units support the air bridge. They include
C-5 crews from the 512th AW, Dover AFB, Del.; 433rd AW, Lackland
AFB, Tex.; and 349th Air Mobility Wing, Travis AFB, Calif. They
also include C-17 crews from the 315th AW, Charleston AFB, S.C.,
and 446th AW, McChord AFB, Wash. AFRC tanker units help the airlifters
cross the Atlantic: KC-135 crews from the 434th Air Refueling Wing,
Grissom ARB, Ind., and 452nd AMW, March ARB, Calif.; KC-10 crews
from the 514th AMW, McGuire AFB, N.J., and 349th AMW, Travis.
“ Light Benches” Wins
DOD announced on March 3 the winning design for the Pentagon memorial
to honor the 184 people killed by the terrorists who flew American
Airlines Flight #77 into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. The design
is titled “Light Benches.”
Submitted by Julie Beckman and Keith Kaseman of New York, the design
includes 184 benches, each with the name of a victim. The benches
will be set according to age, from the youngest at age 3 to the
oldest at 71.
“ Basically, the memorial unit itself is a cast aluminum
sculptural element that does several things,” said Kaseman.
“It’s a reflecting pool that glows at night with light.
It’s a slender cantilevered bench surface that grows out of
the ground and hovers over the ... glowing light pool.” He
added that it would include trees throughout, forming “a canopy
of light and shade and shadow.”
Beckman said they wanted to create a place that is welcoming to
family and friends of the victims but also a place for the nation.
“It is a place where two people can be or thousands of people
can be,” she said.
The memorial will be built on 1.93 acres on Pentagon land near
where the aircraft struck the building. Officials estimate the cost
could go up to about $7 million. They said the money would not come
from “taxpayers funds.”
Although located on Pentagon property, officials said it will be
open to the public. Mike Sullivan, manager of the Pentagon renovation
program, said there is commercial parking at the Pentagon City Mall
with a breezeway under Interstate 395, and there’s Metro.
DIA Follows Speicher Leads
The director of the Defense Intelligence Agency told Congress that
the agency was pursuing leads as if missing Navy pilot Capt. Michael
S. Speicher is “alive and being held by the Iraqis.”
The Iraqis know of his fate, said Vice Adm. Lowell Jacoby.
“ They are not forthcoming with the information that they
have available,” he added.
Speicher was shot down during the 1991 Gulf War and listed as killed
in action. The Navy changed that classification to “missing/captured”
in October 2002, based on new intelligence information.
On Feb. 11, Jacoby told the Senate Intelligence Committee that
DIA had “a number of leads” that it was pursuing “very
aggressively.”
DOD Wants Own Civilian System
Pentagon officials want to take over the personnel system that
governs DOD’s more than 600,000 civilian personnel. This,
they say, would help ease the bureaucracy.
“ Right now our military system is governed by us,”
said Dov S. Zakheim, DOD comptroller. “Our civilian personnel
system, on the other hand, is governed by everybody’s rules.”
He continued, “We believe we are in a unique situation. ...
We need to have a much more different, much more responsive civilian
personnel management system.”
The plan, said Zakheim, is to “go even beyond” what
Homeland Security got when Congress allowed the new department to
set up its own personnel rules. DOD wants the same fast-track approach,
instead of having to come in “every year with bits and pieces
changes.”
He said DOD was finalizing proposals to go to Congress. Among possible
changes is removal of some positions that require Congressional
confirmation and development of a system that would give managers
more flexibility in hiring and firing and a means to reward performance
rather than longevity.
The performance-reward approach falls in with the Bush Administration’s
2004 budget proposal to establish a special fund to boost the base
pay for the best workers. (See “Bush Pushes ‘Best Worker’
Pay,” March, p. 14.)
Court Hears Agent Orange Case
The US Supreme Court on Feb. 26 began hearing arguments to decide
whether two veterans can sue the chemical companies that made Agent
Orange years after the companies settled a 1984 class action suit.
Neither Joseph Isaacson, an Air Force veteran, or Daniel Stephenson,
a retired Army helicopter pilot, was ill in 1984 or up to the deadline
of 1994, so they could not be party to the class action agreement.
Since then, each has been diagnosed with diseases believed to stem
from Agent Orange exposure.
The 1984 agreement stipulated that no one who showed disease symptoms
after 1994 would receive cash payments. Once all claims had been
filed against the $180 million fund, the remaining money went to
research, counseling, and other services to benefit veterans exposed
to Agent Orange, a chemical defoliant used extensively during the
Vietnam War.
Supporters of the original agreement say overturning it could affect
all past class action judgments. However, veterans groups maintain
the negotiated agreement was legally flawed because it did not leave
open a window for those not yet manifesting illness. They also claim
the lawyers for the chemical companies knew a good deal when they
saw it.
USAF, Navy Weather Join Forces
A shortage of personnel prompted the merger of an Air Force weather
unit and its Navy counterpart—both supporting Operation Enduring
Freedom in Afghanistan. Officials said the move has greatly improved
morale, as well as operations.
It took only three weeks to develop training programs and complete
the merger. The weather community was concerned about how the two
services would operate together, given their different responsibilities,
said 1st Lt.
Richard Stegronsky, the USAF weather flight commander. “So
far, it’s been extremely smooth,” he added.
His navy counterpart, Lt. Charlotte Welsch, said the joint operation
also aids continuity. “There are more people here to keep
the knowledge base strong and steady,” she said.
Concurrent Receipt Rises Again
Lawmakers have reintroduced legislation to provide military retirees
with full concurrent receipt rather than the limited compensation
plan reached as a compromise when Administration officials threatened
a Presidential veto if the full measure remained in the Fiscal 2003
defense bill.
Full concurrent receipt would enable all military retirees to
receive both retired pay and any disability pay they are due. Under
the old rules, most retirees have their pay offset by disability
pay.
The 2003 defense bill authorized full restoration for certain categories
of retirees, such as those awarded Purple Hearts and those with
combat-related disability ratings of 60 percent or higher. Those
eligible under the new provisions could number about 30,000.
Regan Guilty, No Death Penalty
A federal jury in late February found Brian P. Regan, a retired
Air Force master sergeant, guilty of two counts of attempted espionage
and one count of gathering national defense information. The jury
decided against imposing the death penalty.
Regan, who had worked with the National Reconnaissance Office while
on active duty and later as a contractor, was arrested in August
2001 as he tried to board a flight to Europe. He was charged with
spying for China, Iraq, and Libya. (See “Retired Airman Faces
Death Penalty in Espionage Case,” June 2002, p. 18.)
Among the evidence against Regan was a letter to Saddam Hussein
asking for $13 million for secret information about US reconnaissance
satellites. The FBI found that letter and a similar one to Muammar
Qaddafi on Regan’s computer.
Regan now faces up to life in prison when he is sentenced in May.
Smallpox Reactions Called Rare
A DOD official said reactions among military members to smallpox
vaccinations have been rare—and all personnel have been treated
and returned to work.
According to Col. John Grabenstein, deputy director for military
vaccines in the Office of the Army Surgeon General, there have been
three serious reactions and seven minor out of more than 100,000
military personnel who have received the smallpox shots. He was
speaking to the Institute of Medicine’s Committee on Smallpox
Vaccination Program Implementation on Feb. 13.
Grabenstein said two men contracted encephalitis—a serious
inflammation of the brain—and had to be hospitalized but had
returned to duty. Another man, an airman, had developed myocarditis—inflammation
of the heart. He was discharged from the hospital within two days.
He also reported that seven individuals developed serious rashes
with pustules, but they were treated as outpatients and returned
to duty.
One of the men who had encephalitis had never received a smallpox
shot before, noted Grabenstein, while the other had been vaccinated
previously. About 63 percent of those vaccinated in the military
were receiving their first smallpox shot.
Pentagon officials had previously reported that about three percent
of those vaccinated missed an average of 1.5 days of work because
of common side effects, such as fever, flat rashes, malaise, or
swollen lymph nodes.
First DOD Web Survey Results In
Pentagon officials on Feb. 25 announced the results of DOD’s
first active duty status of forces survey (SOFS) via the Internet.
DOD’s general conclusion: Things are looking up.
Some 38,000 service members were surveyed last summer to assess
their attitudes toward a variety of personnel and policy issues.
The response rate was 32 percent.
David Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness,
initiated the Web–based SOFS, which will also be used to poll
reservists and DOD civilians.
According to the survey, 83 percent of active duty members were
satisfied with job security; 68 percent were satisfied with military
values, lifestyle, and tradition; and 67 percent with exchange and
commissary availability. Although respondents were less satisfied
with housing (29 percent), pay (38 percent), and family support
programs (41 percent), officials said those numbers were higher
than in a 1999 survey.
Attitudes toward staying in the military were also higher than
in 1999. The percent of those who intend to remain in the service
increased eight percentage points and were even slightly higher
for more junior members.
Day Petitions Supreme Court
Retired Col. George E. “Bud” Day’s petition on
behalf of World War II and Korean War era military retirees was
placed on the US Supreme Court docket Feb. 24. The court gave the
government until March 26 to file briefs, after which the court
will decide if it will hear the case.
Specifically the case is William O. Schism and Robert L. Reinlie
vs. United States and involves government promises of lifetime health
care for military retirees. The government has not denied that promises
were made, just that they were not legally binding. (See “Editorial:
Ghosts in the Machine,” January, p. 2.)
Attorney Day, who is a Medal of Honor recipient, turned to the
Supreme Court when the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C.,
last November overturned a decision— that favored the retirees—made
by a three-judge panel of the appellate court in February 2001.
Day hopes to move the case to class action status, pending a favorable
decision by the Supreme Court.
Tricare Offers Provider Bonuses
This summer, DOD’s Tricare Management Activity plans to offer
a 10 percent bonus to providers in medically underserved areas.
However, TMA must negotiate this arrangement with its managed care
contractors.
Supplementing basic reimbursement rates has been a standard practice
for Medicare in what it terms health professional shortage areas.
Tricare will use Medicare’s HPSA criteria to determine which
providers may receive bonuses.
Low reimbursement rates are one reason some physicians have opted
out of Tricare. (See “Are There Enough Doctors in the House?”
March, p. 46.)
EELV Boosts First DOD Payload
The Air Force on March 10 launched the first military satellite
using an Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle—a Boeing Delta
IV booster. The payload was a Defense Satellite Communications System
satellite.
The EELV program features two families of rockets developed jointly
by the Air Force and two contractors, Boeing and Lockheed Martin,
that will be used for commercial, as well as military launches.
Both the Boeing Delta IV and Lockheed Martin’s Atlas V flew
their maiden missions with commercial payloads last year.
USAF expects the EELVs to reduce the cost of spacelift operations.
School Funds Cut in Budget
President Bush’s Fiscal 2004 budget includes elimination
of federal impact aid—the money provided to local school districts
to educate children of military parents. The school districts lose
tax revenue because of the presence of the bases, which are tax-exempt
federal properties.
The Administration proposal is to eliminate those children who
do not live on a military base from the impact aid calculations—saving
about $125 million annually.
The cut is justifiable, according to Office of Management and Budget
spokeswoman Amy Call, because the school districts do get property
taxes from those children who live in private homes off base. She
said the bases themselves also generate revenue for the community.
The counter argument is that the bases themselves, which occupy,
in many cases, a large portion of some school districts, do not
pay property taxes. That potential revenue is lost.
The federal impact aid program was established during the Truman
Administration. Several Administrations since have proposed cuts
to the program.
DOD Seeks Missile System Waiver
Included in the Administration’s 2004 defense budget is a
request to exempt the new missile defense system from operational
testing required for all new weapon systems. According to DOD, the
waiver is needed so the system can be fielded by 2004.
Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), the ranking member on the Senate
Armed Services Committee, on March 6 told the Defense Writers Group,
the request “is going to be a very contentious issue.”
Lawmakers criticized the Administration last year when the Pentagon
imposed new secrecy rules on the missile defense system program.
The Missile Defense Agency maintained Congress would have the data
it needs to keep watch on the program. (See “MDA Secrecy Rule
Under Fire,” July 2002, p. 16.) If enacted, the testing waiver
would mark the first time such leeway has been granted for a major
weapon system.
At a Feb. 13 Senate hearing, Levin asked Defense Secretary Donald
H. Rumsfeld how he could justify the move. Rumsfeld replied, “I
would justify it very easily.”
He compared it to the use of the Predator unmanned aerial vehicle
during Operation Allied Force in 1999, before the UAV had completed
testing. It was advantageous to use it, he said, and it led to improvements.
He added that he did not think something has to be perfect before
it’s deployed if “reasonable people look at the situation”
and conclude it can be deployed. “In the case of missle defense,
we need to get something out there, in the ground, at sea, and in
a way that we can test it, ... we can evolve it.”
Levin’s response: “If it works.”
Guard Gains National Museum
The first museum dedicated to the National Guard, the oldest military
organization in the country, opened in Washington, D.C., on March
17.
The National Guard Memorial Museum is located at One Massachusetts
Ave., N.W., one block west of Union Station. It occupies 5,600 square
feet of the lower level of the National Guard Association building.
Admission is free.
The museum explores Guard history from its militia roots in 1607
to its support to the war on terror today, according to a release
from the National Guard Educational Foundation, which operates the
museum.
Bush Authorizes New Medals
President Bush signed an executive order March 12 authorizing DOD
to create two new medals to cover service in the global war on terrorism.
One is the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, which
recognizes service members who participate in an expedition to combat
terrorism on or after Sept. 11, 2001. Pentagon officials said this
medal is limited to those who deploy as part of Operation Enduring
Freedom. They said personnel assigned to operations in Afghanistan
and the Philippines are examples of those who may receive the award.
The second, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, recognizes
service in military operations to combat terrorism on or after Sept.
11, 2001. It applies to those who participate in Operation Noble
Eagle and who support Enduring Freedom from outside the area of
eligibility designated for the first medal.
These awards do not replace the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal,
established Dec. 4, 1961, or the Armed Forces Service Medal, created
Jan. 11, 1996. “Any member who qualified for those medals
by reason of service in operations to combat terrorism between Sept.
11, 2001, and a terminal date to be determined by the Secretary
of Defense, shall remain qualified for those medals,” states
the executive order.
However, no one may be awarded more than one of the four medals
for service in the same approved expedition or operation, said officials,
nor can individuals receive more than one award of the two new medals.
Officials said it could take 12 months to produce and stock the
medal.
Belated DFC Awarded to Flier
The Air Force earlier this year awarded the Distinguished Flying
Cross posthumously to B-24 pilot 2nd Lt. Lawrence Berkoff—59
years after his act of heroism and sacrifice.
On Sept. 8, 1944, as Berkoff and his crew took off from Harrington
Field in England, on a mission across the English Channel. They
didn’t get far before they noticed that flames coming from
engine No. 1 would make them perfect targets. Berkhoff turned back
to the field as No. 1 went out and engine No. 2 began to run rough
and send out flames.
The B-24 began to lose altitude quickly. Berkhoff and his copilot
struggled to keep the aircraft level, but Berkoff soon realized
it was impossible with power on one side only. He ordered his crew
to bail out. All made it, as could have Berkoff. However, he remained
with the rapidly descending, and now burning, aircraft to guide
it beyond an English village. The B-24 crashed just 200 yards past
Lambourn.
Senate Backs Nuclear Pact
The Senate on March 6 unanimously approved the nuclear arms treaty
signed by President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin in
May 2002. The Treaty of Moscow calls upon the two countries to reduce
their nuclear arsenals by nearly two-thirds.
The Russian parliament still has to approve the agreement.
The pact requires each nation to reduce its arsenals to between
1,700 and 2,200 warheads by Dec. 13, 2012. This will be the lowest
level in decades. Each side gets to determine the composition of
its strategic nuclear force.
The US plans to retire all 50 of its 10 warhead Peacekeeper ICBMs
and convert four Trident submarines from strategic to conventional
service. Some of the excess warheads will become spares and some
will be destroyed, according to Administration officials.
News Notes
By Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor
- Japan announced in late February that it planned to launch its
first two spy satellites in early spring, with another two likely
to follow this summer. The satellites will give Japan its first
capability to detect ballistic missile launches. Since World War
II, it has relied on the US for such data.
- North Korea on Feb. 26 conducted a flight test of a new long-range
cruise missile, reported the Washington Times. The missile, which
has a range of about 100 miles, is a variant of China’s
HY-2 Silkworm missile. Initial US intelligence reports mistakenly
identified it as a Russian Styx anti-ship missile whose range
is 50 miles.
- Air Combat Command on March 11 announced cancellation of a Red
Flag exercise scheduled for that month at Nellis AFB, Nev., citing
“emerging Air Force deployment requirements.”
- US intelligence officials said Russia in February delivered
additional advanced Su-30MKK fighter–bombers to China and
planned to deliver a new air-to-ground missile—the AS-17X—as
part of the aircraft deal, according to the Washington Times.
Other arms recently traded by Moscow to China include Su-27 fighters,
A-50 airborne warning and control aircraft, and SA-10 and SA-15
surface-to-air missiles.
- USAF said a T-38 aircraft crashed on March 8 into two houses
in Valparaiso, Fla. The pilot had ejected safely, and no one on
the ground was injured. The pilot was from Holloman AFB, N.M.,
and flying a training mission near Eglin AFB, Fla. A safety board
is investigating the incident.
- Northrop Grumman delivered the seventh Global Hawk UAV—the
final advanced concept technology demonstration platform—to
Edwards AFB, Calif., on Feb. 14. The UAV is “the first true
test aircraft and will define future production models,”
said Lt. Col. Michael Guidry, director of the Global Vigilance
Combined Test Force at Edwards. It contains a new mission management
computer and other improvements recommended after the UAV’s
early operational debut in Afghanistan. Northrop is slated to
deliver the first two production vehicles later this year.
- NASA on Feb. 18 released its top level requirements for the
design of the Orbital Space Plane, its name for a next generation
system of space vehicles that will be used for the transport of
crews to and from the International Space Station.
- Human error caused the Sept. 17, 2002, crash of an Air Force
RQ-1 Predator UAV in Southwest Asia, an Air Force investigation
report concluded. The unmanned reconnaissance aircraft was destroyed
upon impact. No one on the ground was injured. Air Force investigators
determined that the pilot accidentally directed the aircraft into
hazardous weather, causing the flight control computers to become
disabled. The pilot re-established communications twice with the
aircraft, but it failed to respond to the pilot’s commands.
- A US–Russian panel on prisoners of war has used information
from Russia’s military archives to help identify seven of
51 American pilots who were reported missing during the Vietnam
War. Other identifications may follow.
- The Air Force broke ground Feb. 20 for a new $15.5 million laboratory
for Air Force Research Laboratory’s Directed Energy Directorate
at Kirtland AFB, N.M. Called the Telescope and Atmosphere Compensation
Laboratory, it will support the directorate in its work on advanced
optical research, laser propagation, and space object imaging.
The building, which is scheduled for completion in April 2004,
will provide space to design, construct, test, and integrate experimental
hardware for optical research, along with work areas and office
space for 84 scientists, engineers, and technicians who are currently
in portable trailers and buildings.
- Pentagon employees began training Feb. 25 in the use of emergency
gas masks to prepare for a possible biological or chemical attack.
DOD began giving its 24,000 workers the masks and is stockpiling
hundreds in cafeterias and other high-traffic areas. The masks
have provided protection for about an hour in testing and are
designed to give wearers 15 to 30 minutes to flee biological or
chemical contaminated areas.
- DOD has certified four more National Guard Civil Support Teams
to assist civil authorities in response to a domestic weapons
of mass destruction incident. They are: 35th CST, St. Albans,
W. Va.; 45th CST, Smyrna, Tenn.; 46th CST, Montgomery, Ala.; 51st
CST, Augusta, Mich. These four bring the total number of certified
teams to 31.
- Orbital Sciences on Feb. 6 successfully launched the first prototype
of the interceptor boost vehicle it is developing, testing, and
manufacturing for Boeing to support the Missile Defense Agency’s
Ground-based Midcourse Defense system. The booster launched from
Vandenberg AFB, Calif., and flew over the Pacific Ocean, reaching
an altitude of 1,125 miles and traveling about 3,500 miles. The
launch verified vehicle design and flight characteristics, gathered
flight data, and confirmed performance of the propulsion system.
- A midair collision between two A-10s Feb. 18 over Cannon Gunnery
Range near Ft. Leonard Wood, Mo., resulted in minor damage to
the two aircraft. Neither pilot was injured and both flew their
aircraft safely back to Whiteman AFB, Mo. A board of officers
is investigating the incident.
- The UK production version of the Eurofighter Typhoon made its
maiden flight Feb. 14, when it flew from the BAE Systems site
at Warton, UK, for 21 minutes. The other three Typhoon program
participants—Germany (EADS Deutschland), Italy (Alenia),
and Spain (EADS-CASA) have already flown their production versions.
Initial deliveries of a total 620 aircraft are expected later
this year. Germany will receive 180; Italy, 121; Spain, 87; and
UK, 232.
- Northrop Grumman on Feb. 23 successfully completed the first
flight of its Pegasus X-47A unmanned aerial vehicle, landing the
experimental vehicle at a predesignated point to simulate the
ability to “catch” a tailhook while landing on a carrier.
The X-47A, which measures 27.9 feet long, with a wingspan of 27.8
feet, serves as a test bed for Northrop’s work on a naval
unmanned aircraft under a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
and Navy program.
- According to a USAF investigation report released Feb. 19, engine
failure caused an F-16C to crash Sept. 11, 2002, at Hattiesburg,
Miss. The Air National Guard pilot, from the 187th Fighter Wing,
Dannelly Field, Ala., ejected safely, receiving minor injuries.
The fighter was destroyed upon impact, 1,300 feet short of the
runway at the airport in Hattiesburg. The engine’s high
pressure turbine post failed, allowing the turbine blades to break
free and damage the engine.
- Orbital Sciences announced Jan. 31 that it received a USAF contract
to provide space launch and missile defense target vehicles using
deactivated Peacekeeper ICBM assets. The contract could provide
up to 41 launch vehicles for a maximum value of $475 million.
- USAF announced Feb. 20 formation of a new Directorate of Innovation
and Transformation to consolidate, under a single director, Air
Force logistics transformation initiatives and information system
integration. Grover Dunn, former deputy director of maintenance,
will head the new directorate, which will fall under the Deputy
Chief of Staff for Installations and Logistics.
- Northrop Grumman announced earlier this year it had conducted
a successful demonstration of a UAV system designed to deliver
a variety of payloads to multiple preprogrammed locations. The
company derived the system from its BQM-34 Firebee drone within
eight weeks.
- Members of the 376th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron,
Manas, Kyrgyzstan, delivered $1,800 worth of goods to an orphanage
in nearby Bishkek. The goods included 70 comforters, 10 sets of
bedsheets, five floor heaters, four cassette tape players, clothes,
and music and video tapes, as well as various other supplies for
the children. Squadron members raised the funds through direct
donations and fund-raising events, such as tournaments, craft
sales, and other activities.
- USAF named Pacific Air Forces the major command recipient of
the 2002 Secretary of the Air Force Safety Award. The 11th Wing,
Bolling AFB, D.C., earned the award in the direct reporting unit/field
operating agency category. The Chief of Staff Individual Safety
Award went to MSgt. Shane B. Finders, 20th Air Force, F.E. Warren
AFB, Wyo.
- Officials at Electronic Systems Center, Hanscom AFB, Mass.,
announced Feb. 28 that USAF had designated its new multisensor
command and control aircraft the E-10A. ESC manages acquisition
and development of the E-10A, intended to be the central platform
in USAF’s new command and control constellation. (See “Seeking
a Triple-Threat Sensor,” November 2002, p. 38.)
USAF awarded BAE Systems a $4.6 million contract to provide advanced
identification, friend or foe equipment for Block 25, 30, and
32 versions of USAF’s F-16C aircraft. The total program,
including options over the next five years, is worth approximately
$100 million.
- The National Inventors Hall of Fame announced a list of 17 inductees
for 2003, including Theodore Von Karman, the 1944 chair of the
Army Air Forces Scientific Advisory Board, for his research and
work in aerodynamics.
USAF
Outlines $4 Billion in Unfunded Priorities
The Air Force in February identified $4 billion
worth of programs the service would like to fund, if lawmakers
make additional money available during the Fiscal 2004 budget
process.
The 66-item Unfunded Priority List “in
no sense is an alternative to the fundamental priorities of
our President’s budget,” wrote Air Force Secretary
James G. Roche in the list’s cover letter. The list
was sent to the House Armed Services Committee at the committee’s
request.
The “wish list” highlights already
planned programs that could be accelerated or expanded if
additional dollars become available. The two top items alone
total nearly $1 billion and highlight the service’s
growing need for additional money for depot-purchased equipment
maintenance and aircraft spares.
According to the supporting documentation,
USAF’s top unfunded requirements are:
1. DPEM. The service noted
that depot-purchased equipment maintenance funding is the
lowest in 10 years, at 79 percent of requirements. An additional
$516 million would bring this program back to historically
effective levels and avoid “depot maintenance backlogs
on our critical weapon systems.”
2. Flying Hour Spares. The
Air Force “faces an extraordinary degree of uncertainty”
about the actual operational profile it will fly in Fiscal
2004, the list explains. The service “took some risk”
with its spares funding for the year, risk that could be alleviated
with $412 million.
3. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection.
USAF explained that $140.7 million would improve the ability
to mitigate force protection concerns and begin “minimal
investment” in transformational technologies needed
for long-term improvements.
4. Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources.
An additional $149 million could be used to purchase equipment
needed to support beddown of deployed forces in austere locations
where infrastructure is lacking or destroyed or to augment
existing sites.
5. Aircrew Life Support.
The service could use $50.6 million for additional panoramic
night vision goggles, ejection seat improvements, better parachutes,
and new survival vests and radios.
The Air Force then listed two options—lease
and accelerated buy—to handle its need to replace aging
aerial refueling aircraft. The lease option would give the
service more new tankers sooner and, according to USAF, for
less money.
6A. Lease 100 KC-767A. This
option seeks $132 million to support a lease-to-buy arrangement
for 67 KC-767A tankers by Fiscal 2009 and a full complement
of 100 new tankers by Fiscal 2011.
6B. Accelerate KC-135 Replacement.
If the lease arrangement is not approved, this option seeks
$154 million to accelerate an existing KC-135 replacement
program by two years. This “potentially delivers 16
aircraft” by Fiscal 2009 and the complete fleet of 100
tankers by Fiscal 2014.
7. Distributed Ground Station Block
20. The legacy intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
architecture needs to be replaced, and $123.3 million would
help “provide decision quality information within time
lines to impact the ‘kill chain’ ” and transform
the ground station infrastructure.
8. Rivet Joint Signals Intelligence
Modernization. Existing systems are reaching maximum
capacity, and $5.5 million would correct a signals intelligence
collection gap by providing for a host of new components and
equipment upgrades.
9. Common Configuration Block 35.
Currently, three of USAF’s 14 Compass Call aircraft
lack funding for the Block 35 upgrade. The $15 million delta
“exacerbates already critical availability shortfalls”
for the low-density, high-demand aircraft.
10. Joint Surveillance Target Attack
Radar System Production Shutdown. When the original
13-aircraft Joint STARS program was increased in piecemeal
fashion to 17 aircraft, $20 million in production shutdown
funding was not set aside. The Air Force must pay this bill.
In his letter, Roche noted the Air Force has been careful
to limit the unfunded list to items that “can be executed
in a timely manner and that will not disrupt the program”
laid out in the President’s budget request.
— Adam J. Hebert |
Despite
Complaints, USAF Declared Saudi–based CAOC
“ Fully Capable”
The Air Force continued to improve its combined
air operations center at Prince Sultan AB, Saudi Arabia, despite
claims that the center was unready to mount a major theater
war.
A USAF Tiger Team issued a critical report
last summer, but its conclusions first surfaced in February
in a Washington Times article.
In response to questions from Air Force Magazine,
USAF said, “The PSAB CAOC is fully capable of effectively
coordinating and directing combat operations” and “is
far more capable than the operations centers used in Operations
Desert Storm [1991] and Allied Force [1999].”
The Tiger Team’s report stated that
the CAOC “is not currently poised to smoothly transition
to an MTW.” It identified 75 actions the service should
take to enhance the center.
The service acknowledged in mid–March
that so far it had implemented 27 of the 75 changes the team
recommended.
Gen. John P. Jumper, USAF Chief of Staff,
dispatched the team to Prince Sultan in May 2002 to “examine
the manpower, processes, and equipment required” to
support air operations for US Central Command. The team spent
two weeks at 9th Air Force headquarters at Shaw AFB, S.C.,
and PSAB and forwarded its findings to Jumper on July 8.
A USAF spokeswoman said the team has met “on
multiple occasions since that time to update the status and
close action items generated” by the report.
Among the items noted by the team was “confusion
about roles, responsibilities, and chain of command.”
It said the CAOC operators were not sure who they should take
direction from or who they should consult to get things done.
The different dynamics of various operations (Northern Watch
and Southern Watch in Iraq and Operation Enduring Freedom
in Afghanistan) “led to a somewhat ad hoc organization
optimized for none and not well suited to an MTW–sized
conflict,” the Tiger Team reported.
It also noted that intelligence reports were
too widely distributed within the CAOC, hindering coordination
“and unity of effort during execution.”
It pointed out that there was a sharp upturn
in the learning curve when many of the CAOC’s personnel
rotated back to other jobs all at once, forcing the center
to constantly relearn lessons. There was also mention of a
cap on the number of people who could be detailed to the CAOC—a
limit imposed by host nation Saudi Arabia—which hindered
proper staffing.
The Air Force said it has implemented many
of the easier to fix items, such as changing schedules for
CAOC personnel so that outgoing people had time to “exchange
information” with their replacements.
Among “the most significant” changes
USAF said it first put into effect was a compilation “by
name” of all personnel who would staff the CAOC “to
prosecute an air campaign in Southwest Asia.” The listing
includes personnel from the rotational air and space expeditionary
forces, the headquarters of Central Command Air Forces and
9th Air Force, Air National Guard augmentees, and joint and
coalition liaison teams, “along with interagency analysts
to round out the warfighting team.”
USAF also took immediate steps to improve
operator orientation and theater training to help operators
more clearly understand roles and responsibilities. Personnel
assigned to the CAOC also must now complete the Joint Air
Command and Control Course.
At the time of the team’s report, the
Prince Sultan CAOC was barely a year old. USAF said the report
“highlighted many organizational, process, and system
improvements to sustain, stabilize, and to institutionalize
the CAOC and all air operations centers.”
— John A. Tirpak |
CMSAF
Thomas Barnes, 1930–2003
Retired Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force
Thomas N. Barnes died March 17 in Sherman, Tex., from cancer.
He was 72.
Barnes was the fourth person to be named to
USAF’s top enlisted post and the first black to hold
such a position in any of the military services. He served
in that post from 1973 to 1977, when he retired.
Born in Chester, Pa., in 1930, Barnes entered
the Air Force in 1949, training at the Chanute AFB, Ill.,
aircraft engine and hydraulics specialist school. He served
as a hydraulics specialist at McChord AFB, Wash., then was
sent to Japan in 1952. Shortly after arriving in Japan, he
completed on-the-job training as a flight engineer and served
in both specialties because of a manning shortage.
Through 1965, Barnes served as a crew chief,
flight engineer, and senior controller on various aircraft,
including the B-25, B-52, C-45, and C-47.
In October 1966, he entered F-4 field training,
and, in December, he went to Southeast Asia, serving with
the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing until December 1967. He next
served at the pilot training base at Laughlin AFB, Tex., and,
in 1971, Air Training Command selected him as the command’s
senior enlisted advisor.
After his retirement, he remained active in
Air Force matters and was often sought as a speaker at military
functions.
Barnes once responded to a question in an
interview: “I’d like to be remembered as a role
model for people who believe they can’t get there.”
He added that it was an honor to be chosen as the Chief Master
Sergeant of the Air Force “on the basis of my qualifications,
as opposed to my race or my gender.” |
End
Strength Issue Flares in Congress
In Congressional testimony on the Fiscal 2004
defense budget, each of the service Chiefs described the increasing
stress that the high operations tempo is having on their personnel,
especially those in a few critical skills.
Yet, lawmakers pointed out that the Pentagon
had failed to include any significant end strength increases
in the budget request.
Asked to explain the disparity, Air Force
Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper said, “It’s
not just a matter of adding end strength.”
Jumper continued, “It’s a matter
of making efficiencies out of what you’ve got.”
He said the Air Force had identified more than 12,000 billets
that do not require a military member to fill them. These
individuals will be reassigned and, in some cases, retrained
to critical career fields in need of additional personnel.
Those fields include force protection, combat search and rescue,
and special operations forces.
Jumper maintained that if the efficiencies
the Air Force is working “don’t do the job, I
will be the first to go back to the Secretary of Defense and
ask for the relief that we need.” |
Lawmakers
Fear Reserve Forces Are Overused
A Congressional delegation’s recent
visit to US European Command facilities has added new focus
to concerns that the use of Guard and Reserve forces has reached
a critical level.
In a Feb. 12 trip report, three Republicans
and one Democrat told Duncan Hunter (R–Calif.), House
Armed Services Committee chairman, that reserve forces are
being overused. They said the situation could lead to problems
for both active duty and reserve units in the future.
“ The Total Force policy is being implemented
in ways never anticipated,” according to the report,
signed by delegation leader Rep. John M. McHugh (R–N.Y.)
and Reps. Robin Hayes (R–N.C.), Mike McIntyre (D–N.C.),
and Jeff Miller (R–Fla.). They cited anecdotal evidence
that the high operating tempo may drive some reservists out
of the military.
Reservists serving in EUCOM told the lawmakers
during their 10-day trip that “leaving the reserves
is an increasingly attractive option” and that some
employers are beginning to see reserve status as a liability
in employees.
More than 188,000 reservists are on active
duty (as of March 12) to support the war on terrorism. Some
have been serving for longer than a year.
The lawmakers said they were impressed by
the professionalism and dedication of the EUCOM forces and
heard “no explicit statements” that the reservists
would be unable to do what is asked of them.
They noted that “missions being performed
by reservists today are above a rate that is sustainable simply
through the reserve component volunteers.”
McHugh told the publication Congress Daily
that EUCOM commanders could not do their jobs without Guard
and Reserve support. “We need more men and women in
uniform,” he said.
— AJH |
USAF
Leaders Blast Anonymous Critics of War Strategy
Top Air Force officials condemned unnamed
critics who complained, in a Washington Times front page article,
about a draft Iraq air war plan.
The Feb. 13 article asserted that some senior
military officials, who said they were briefed informally
on the target lists, were concerned the Iraq war plan was
too timid. They said it “would largely spare infrastructure
targets, such as bridges, and most, if not all, telephone
communications” from air attack, to limit devastation
for Iraqi citizens.
This restraint would leave ground forces facing
tougher defenses than necessary, they claimed. One official
was quoted as saying there were too many “political
restrictions” being placed on the air war plan.
USAF leaders quickly took aim at the critics.
“ People who make that comment are either
ones who were in on the planning and didn’t have the
courage to speak up at the time or those who are content not
to know about the plan in detail but take potshots from the
shadows,” said Gen. John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff,
Feb. 13 at the Air Force Association’s symposium in
Orlando, Fla.
“ I have great concern about the professionalism
of officers who would comment in this way,” Jumper added.
Officials who would complain to the press are a “small
minority of the officers in our Air Force.”
Air Force Secretary James G. Roche echoed
that sentiment in remarks in Orlando Feb. 14. He said, “There
is no such thing as an informal war plan briefing ... and
no such thing as an anonymous Air Force officer.” If
officials lack the courage to express concerns through the
chain of command, “they are not living up to the standards
of our Air Force.”
In a letter Jumper fired off to the newspaper,
he noted that the criticisms were “based on the musings
of a single anonymous source about classified contingency
planning.” Jumper added that in his 37 years of military
service, he had never seen “an environment of such joint
cooperation and interservice communication.”
He continued: “The very best minds of
each service are working to maximize the combined effects
of all our forces in pursuit of victory. On that point—and
unlike the shadow critic who violates his or her oath even
while presuming to represent other airmen—I am willing
to put my name and reputation on record.”
— AJH |
USAF:
Jamming GPS Signals Won’t Work
Global Positioning System signals, which guide
newer US munitions to their targets, can be jammed, but not
easily, and not for long.
Efforts are under way both to make the signal
broadcast by GPS satellites more jam-resistant
and to reduce interference with GPS–guided munitions
when they reach the target area, according to Lt. Col. John
Carter, USAF chief of space requirements.
Carter said the service has been working “from
the day we built GPS” on ways to frustrate would-be
jammers.
“ We’re very confident we can
do that,” he said.
An enemy hoping to use a GPS jamming signal
to fool weapons like the Joint Direct Attack Munition shouldn’t
count on success, Carter said.
For one thing, JDAMs also have inertial navigation
systems that helpthem guide their way to a target, so jamming
the GPS signal being received by JDAM is no gurantee the weapon
will go off course. Other weapons use laser or optical guidance,
with GPS signals as simply a backup.
Moreover, anyone transmitting a GPS–jamming
signal “can be found, and anyone who can be found can
be targeted,” Carter pointed out. He advised “bad
guys” not to be the one picked to jam a GPS signal.
Reportedly, Iraq has obtained a number of Russian–made
transmitters that can spoof GPS signals.
The current generation of GPS IIR satellites
already have a measure of jam resistance, by which they can
broadcast with greater power if their signal is being jammed,
according to Air Force Undersecretary Peter B. Teets. He called
this tactic “flexible power.”
Teets added that “real
improvement” will come with GPS III, about 10 years
from now. It will be “much more jam-resistant on the
satellite side, on the control-element side, and on the user-equipment
side.” The Air Force, he said, “is doing the necessary
smart things to enable GPS to serve us well.”
— JAT |
Little
Belgium, Doing Its Level Best
The Belgian minister of defense rushed to
support his nation after the Wall Street Journal highlighted
Belgium as a case study in European military inefficiencies.
“ We refuse to squander our public funds
for the sole purpose of national glory, since we prefer to
spend them on social affairs, health care, and pensions for
our fellow citizens,” Andre Flahaut, Belgium’s
defense chief, wrote in a Feb. 26 rebuttal.
The Feb. 13 Wall Street Journal article (“How
Europe’s Armies Let Their Guard Down”) noted that
many of NATO’s forces “are poorly equipped, in
part because so much money is spent on pay and benefits.”
It went on to say, “Belgium, for example, employs hundreds
of military barbers, musicians, and other personnel who aren’t
likely to be called into battle.
Yet Belgium doesn’t have the money
to replace aging helicopters or conduct regular combat training
exercises.”
In his response, Flahaut said, “The
primary mission of our armed forces is to maintain the peace
and to help the civilian population (Belgian or foreign).”
Belgium does this “without being belligerent
or being convinced of having been elected by a higher authority
to keep watch over the world order,” he added.
Flahaut also objected to the Wall Street
Journal’s numbers. The newspaper said Belgium spends
“some 67 percent of its annual defense budget”
on personnel and “only about 5.4 percent” on equipment.
Flahaut said Belgium spends 62 percent on
personnel and 11 percent on equipment.
— AJH |
USAF
Leaders Vow To Make Changes at Academy
The Air Force has been under fire from lawmakers,
news media, and parents of cadets since multiple allegations
of rape, cover-up, and retaliation against victims surfaced
earlier this year concerning the Air Force Academy in Colorado
Springs, Colo.
According to Sen. Wayne Allard (R–Colo.),
as of March 5, 25 female cadets—15 former and 10 current—had
complained to his office that they had been raped or sexually
assaulted at the academy. Some said they were ignored, punished,
or shunned for reporting the incidents, and some did not make
reports for fear of being ostracized or kicked out.
Allard was joined by Sen. John Warner (R–Va.),
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and several
other lawmakers in asking for investigations of the situation
at the academy.
A working group, appointed by Air Force Secretary
James G. Roche and headed by USAF general counsel Mary L.
Walker, began gathering information at the academy Feb. 19.
Walker’s group is one of three elements in the investigation,
Roche told members of the House Armed Services Committee on
Feb. 27. The second is a review of each case by the DOD inspector
general. The third is oversight by the undersecretary of defense
for personnel and readiness.
Roche also told the lawmakers that Air Force
leaders had first become “aware that something was grossly
wrong when we received an e-mail back in mid–December.”
Before that, he said, a Congressman had sent them a letter
on a single case. The e-mail signaled something “broader,”
said Roche.
The Secretary then said that he and USAF Chief
of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper have a simple logic: “We
must not commission any criminal. We must not allow any cadet
to take violence on another cadet. ... We are also committed
to ridding the academy of any cadet who would knowingly harbor
some cadet who has done this. ... We want to rid the academy
of any cadets who would shun any victim. ... We will not tolerate
this.”
Both Roche and Jumper have since visited the
academy and talked with cadets and staff. Amid some calls
for removal of the current academy leadership, both senior
service leaders said the problem did not start with the current
leadership. Instead, they pointed to budget and manpower restrictions
that led the service to make cutbacks in counseling training
for staff officers. Roche called the problems “a corporate
responsibility.”
The service plans to implement major policy
changes before the arrival of the new class of cadets in June.
Roche and Jumper jointly sent letters March
13 to the parents of incoming cadets, saying, “We’ve
made it clear to the cadets that all perpetrators, those who
fail to act to prevent assaults, those who knowingly protect
perpetrators after the fact, and those who would shun or harass
anyone with the courage to come forward and report these criminals,
will be brought to justice.”
The service has set up a phone line for cadet
victims of sexual assault to report their assault directly
to the Air Force inspector general. Current and former cadets
may call 703-588-1541 from 8 a.m.–4 p.m. (EST), Monday–Friday. |
Proposals
on Joint Chiefs Hit Wall of Opposition
The Defense Department has canned draft proposals
that would have cut the terms of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
and eliminated Joint Staff autonomy. When lawmakers queried
top Pentagon officials about it in February, all asserted
they had not seen the proposed plan.
According to Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.),
a draft of proposed legislation that circulated the Pentagon
last fall called for reducing the terms of the Joint Chiefs
from four years to two, with the option of a two-year renewal.
That proposal was requested in a memo signed by David Chu,
undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness.
The other proposal cited by Levin would have
required the Joint Staff to report to the Defense Secretary
instead of to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Approval
for selections to the Joint Staff would also have been shifted
to the Secretary. And the draft legislation, said Levin, “would
strike the statutory requirement that the Joint Staff be,
quote, ‘independently organized and operated.’
”
When Levin asked Defense Secretary Donald
H. Rumsfeld and JCS Chairman Gen. Richard B. Myers about the
proposals at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing Feb.
13, both said they had not yet seen the draft proposals. However,
Rumsfeld noted that he and Myers had “talked about”
the way OSD and the JCS operate and that they saw some duplications.
“ There might be a way to merge some
of those pieces in a way that did not in any way inhibit the
Chairman’s responsibility under law” to provide
independent military advice to the national command authority,
Rumsfeld said.
At a Feb. 25 committee hearing, Levin asked
each of the service chiefs about the proposals. Each said
they had not seen the draft proposals but defended their four-year
terms.
“ For a service chief, a longer-term
perspective is helpful,” said Army Chief of Staff Gen.
Erik K. Shinseki.
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark
agreed, saying, “There’s a great learning curve
in these assignments.
USAF Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper said
that although the Chiefs had not been briefed on the proposals,
they did recently discuss the issue with Rumsfeld. Jumper
emphasized, “I would think the Secretary would want
his service chiefs in position long enough to be able to make
a difference and to establish rapport with one another to
be able to deal with the joint issues that we deal with every
day.”
A Feb. 27 InsideDefense.com article reported
that the proposals on the Joint Chiefs had been dropped.
—AJH |
Will
USAF Get 150 FB-22 Bombers?
Air Force Secretary James G. Roche told lawmakers
he would like to have at least 150 FB-22s (a proposed bomber
version of the F/A-22) in addition to 381 F/A-22s.
At a House Armed Services Committee hearing
on Feb. 27, committee chairman Rep. Duncan Hunter (R–Calif.)
exclaimed that the “extremely small present day bomber
force of 21 B-2s, 76 B-52s, and 63 B-1s ... is a tragedy.”
He then asked Roche, “If you had your druthers and you
had the money, what size bomber force would you like to have
today?”
The Air Force leader’s initial response
was to discuss types and numbers of targets. Hunter interrupted,
saying, “I’m not going to let you make the answer
complex. ... You’ve got a lot of deep strike requirements
that may percolate real quickly. How many bombers would you
like to have?”
Roche said: “My definition of bombers,
strike systems: I would like to have the 21 B-2s we currently
have. I would like to have 60 of the B-1s with the [Joint
Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile] extended range on board.
I would like to have the chance to build
the FB-22, which has dramatic range, almost as much as the
B-2 and that also can defend itself, that has advances in
stealth. I would like to have 381 minimum F/A-22s, minimum
of 150 FB-22s, and then I would like to go to the next generation.”
|
DOD,
Army Officials Joust Over Iraq Numbers
The price of unseating the current Iraqi regime,
setting up a new government, occupying the country, and rebuilding
its infrastructure could cost as little as $10 billion and
as much as $100 billion, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D.
Wolfowitz told Congress on Feb. 26.
“ We have no idea what we will need
until we get there,” Wolfowitz told the House Budget
Committee. He said a major cost factor would be how many troops
would be needed for postwar occupation and how long they would
stay.
The $100 billion figure he cited was a notional,
in-house Pentagon guess that assumed the very worst case scenarios,
Wolfowitz noted. But he specifically cited a figure of $95
billion as being too high. He also said all such estimates
ignored Iraq’s oil revenues of up to $20 billion a year
and discounted the contributions that could be made by other
countries.
Wolfowitz made his remarks as estimates of
Iraqi reconstruction as high as $300 billion swirled around
Washington. (A senior Pentagon official, briefing reporters
on the Fiscal 2004 defense budget, said DOD is notionally
using a figure of about $20 billion a month for combat and
$10 billion a month for postwar occupation.)
While he insisted it is too early to guess
how much a regime change in Iraq would cost, Wolfowitz did
contradict the estimate of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric K.
Shinseki on how many troops would be required for the postwar
occupation.
During a Senate Armed Services Committee
several days earlier, when lawmakers pressed Shinseki to provide
an estimate, he said it would take “on the order of
several hundred thousand soldiers” to do the job. His
answer carried some credibility since he had been a commander
of peacekeeping troops in the Balkans.
Wolfowitz, however, called Shinseki’s
number “wildly off the mark” and “highly
suspect.” He argued that a force for Iraq could be smaller
and not stay as long. There is no history of ethnic warfare
in Iraq as there was in the Balkans, Wolfowitz contended,
despite the fact that the Iraqi government has violently repressed
both Kurds in the north and Shiite Muslims in the south. Wolfowitz
said Iraqi civilians will welcome American troops, “provided
they leave as soon as possible.”
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, at a
press conference the next day, said that the answer to the
question posed to Shinseki by the committee “is not
knowable.”
“ We have no idea how long the war will
last,” Rumsfeld said. “We don’t know to
what extent there may or may not be weapons of mass destruction
used. We don’t ... have any idea whether or not there
would be ethnic strife. We don’t know exactly how long
it would take to find weapons of mass destruction and destroy
them. ... There are so many variables that it is not knowable.”
He went on to say, though, that he, too, thought
Shinseki’s number was “off the mark” and
“simply not the case.”
It’s “not logical to me that it
would take as many forces ... following the conflict, as it
would to win the war,” Rumsfeld asserted. He also said
several countries have volunteered forces for “stabilization
activities,” which would reduce the number of US troops
needed.
—JAT |
DOD
Intel Chief Says He Will Stay in His Lane
Stephen A. Cambone, the Pentagon’s newly
minted Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, assured
lawmakers he will not be a rival to the Director of Central
Intelligence.
Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), ranking
member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, supported creation
of the position, but he noted that critics claim the job is
evidence of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld’s “contest”
with DCI George H. Tenet “for dominance over American
intelligence operations.”
At the nomination hearing on Feb. 27, Levin
asked Cambone to answer those critics who have said it is
Rumsfeld’s bid to create “another Director of
Central Intelligence, for all practical purposes.”
Cambone insisted that the new undersecretary
post—which oversees the National Security Agency, National
Imagery and Mapping Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and
others—is not intended as a “substitute”
for the DCI. Instead, he said, it will give the DCI a single
point of contact at the Pentagon.
The office will focus on getting “customer”
questions answered and needs addressed in the collection and
analysis process, said Cambone.
He noted that a key customer question, one
that Rumsfeld has raised, concerns how the Pentagon agencies
and other intelligence agencies arrived at their conclusions
and what their sources of information were.
These are the kinds of questions the Secretary
of Defense tends to ask about “finished intelligence,”
said Cambone, and the answers are necessary to help Pentagon
leadership act on the information they receive.
Cambone emphasized, though, that his office
“is not being structured to do analysis.”
His job, he said, is to provide single-point
leadership to disparate intelligence organizations within
the Defense Department. The impetus behind creation of the
office is to streamline DOD’s approach to intelligence
matters, such that his office will be able to respond to any
DCI “needs that can be satisfied by the Department of
Defense ... with alacrity.”
He added, “There have been occasions
in the past—which I am sorry to say—when that
has not always been the case.”
—JAT |
Copyright Air Force Association. All rights reserved.
|