April 2003 Vol. 86, No. 4

By Suzann Chapman, Managing Editor
American Forces Commence Operations in Iraq
March 20, 2003—President Bush told the nation at 10:16 p.m.
on March 19 (5:16 a.m., March 20, Persian Gulf time) that US and coalition
forces had gone into action against selected military targets in Iraq.
He said, “We will accept no outcome but victory.”
In the predawn strikes, US Air Force F-117 radar-evading fighters dropped
GPS–guided 2,000-pound bombs, and US Navy ships fired cruise missiles
on at least three targets in Baghdad where intelligence indicated senior Iraqi
leaders were present
.The US called the action Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Full coverage of the war will appear in next month’s issue.—the
editors
USAF Triggers Stop-Loss
The Air Force on March 14 announced it had implemented Stop-Loss to retain
personnel in certain career fields. The action is effective on May 2.
In this second use of Stop-Loss since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, USAF has
listed 43 officer and 56 enlisted specialties “critical” to the
service’s ability to conduct operations. The action affects active duty,
Air National Guard, and Air Force Reserve Command personnel.
US Beefs Up Bombers for Korean Crisis
Administration officials on March 5 said the US was sending USAF B-52s and
B-1B bombers to Guam to be within easy striking distance of North Korea, should
diplomacy fail.
The deployment order was not tied to a March 2 incident in which four North
Korean fighter aircraft intercepted a USAF RC-135S Cobra Ball aircraft flying
in international airspace. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld had issued
the order days earlier in what Administration officials said was a realignment
of forces to offset the buildup in Southwest Asia.
The North Korean aircraft came within 50 feet of the unarmed USAF reconnaissance
aircraft, but they did not “acquire” or lock on to the US aircraft,
as early reports had indicated. It is the first such incident since the North
Koreans shot down a Navy EC-121 surveillance aircraft, killing 31 Americans,
in 1969.
President Bush has maintained that diplomacy will work to restrain North Korea’s
nuclear weapons program. The movement of the bombers, officials said, serves
as insurance against opportunistic moves by North Korea.
Charleston Workload Soars
The amount of cargo passing through Charleston AFB, S.C., on its way to Southwest
Asia skyrocketed after two cargo processing buildings at Dover AFB, Del., collapsed
under heavy snow in late February. USAF estimated a 250 percent increase for
some Charleston units.
The 437th Aerial Port Squadron members normally process five to seven truckloads
each day. That grew to more than 70 trucks a day as Air Mobility Command shifted
the flow from Delaware to South Carolina. With about 150 squadron members deployed
overseas, the unit had to call for help from other active duty and reservist
aerial port specialists around the country.
Officials said the work was also nonstop for other Charleston units—security
forces to search the trucks, logistics readiness to unload them, and transportation
to keep forklifts and other equipment running—as base personnel prepared
the cargo for commercial airlift to a forward operating location.
USAF Tests 21K Bomb
The Air Force on March 11 announced it had tested a 21,500-pound precision
guided munition at the Air Armament Center’s western test range in Florida.
A C-130 dropped the bomb, called the Massive Ordnance Air Blast weapon.
USAF said it is the largest conventional bomb in existence. It outstrips the
15,000-pound “Daisy Cutter,” or BLU-82 bomb, used in Afghanistan
against al Qaeda and Taliban forces hiding in caves. The Daisy Cutter, which
can obliterate anything within hundreds of yards, serves as a tremendous psychological
weapon, as well.
The Air Force Research Lab began the MOAB project in Fiscal 2002 and is expected
to complete the program this year.
Aircrews Hit No-Fly Zone Threats
Coalition aircrews enforcing the no-fly zones in Iraq on March 14 struck a
mobile radar system that Iraq forces had moved into the southern no-fly zone
in violation of UN resolutions, said US Central Command.
It was the second such movement by Iraq in two days. CENTCOM officials said
that Iraqi mobile anti-aircraft systems remain a threat to coalition aircraft.
Iraq has targeted air patrols in both the southern and northern no-fly zones.
When Iraqi anti-aircraft artillery fired on coalition aircraft on March 10,
CENTCOM directed strikes against three unmanned, underground military communications
sites.
Gen. Richard B. Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on March 11
told reporters that patrols had been stepped up to keep the pressure on Saddam
Hussein. “We are now flying several hundred sorties a day, with 200 or
300 over the southern no-fly zone,” said Myers.
Leaflet Drop Reaches 12 Million
US Central Command on March 17 reported that coalition aircraft had dropped
more than 1.4 million informational leaflets into western and southern Iraq
that day, raising the year’s total to 12 million.
The leaflets have a variety of messages directed at Iraqi military members
and civilians. One of the March 17 messages told Iraqi civilians that they
could be the victims if Saddam Hussein uses chemical weapons. Another encouraged
Iraqi military members not to use weapons of mass destruction. Some leaflets
provide information on how to tune into coalition radio broadcasts.
Iraqi Forces Defecting?
US intelligence sources in northern Iraq said in late February that dozens
of Iraqi military members had defected since the first of the year. Many more
are preparing and hiding white flags of surrender.
The Washington Times reported that two of the defectors revealed that morale
was low and much of their equipment defective. One said his division was “at
about 25 percent effectiveness and most soldiers were hiding their white flags,” according
to the Times.
USAF Expands Deployment Force
The Air Force has increased the number of personnel in its deployment pool
to 75 percent of the force. That represents a growth of nearly 100,000 people
in just the past year, according to Maj. Gen. Timothy A. Peppe, special assistant
for air and space expeditionary forces.
Although this means the service has identified 269,000 deployment positions,
said Peppe, there still are not enough individuals in certain specialties.
“ Most of this increased deployment capability is in associate unit
type codes, so they’re not primary deployers,” said Peppe. The
increase came largely from staffs at USAF, major commands, direct reporting
units, and field operating agencies. Their inclusion in the deployment pool,
he said, does help spread the “pain.” The Air Force now exempts
from deployment only select career fields and positions, such as ROTC staff
members, many instructors, recruiters, space operators, missile crews, and
missile security professionals.
Westover Surges for Gulf Buildup
Within hours of receiving word that C-5 aircraft loaded with troops and equipment
bound for the Persian Gulf were on their way, Air Force Reserve Command’s
439th Airlift Wing at Westover ARB, Mass., set up 24-hour operations to gas
and inspect the aircraft and feed the troops—normally a four-hour job
per aircraft.
As it did for the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Westover serves as a key air bridge
for US forces deploying to Southwest Asia. AFRC officials said that since Westover
started its 24-hour operations Feb. 2, the base had processed 375 aircraft,
primarily C-5s and C-130s, and pumped more than 3.3 million gallons of JP-8
fuel. It has also handled 2,571 passengers and more than 8.5 million pounds
of cargo.
AFRC Extends Air Bridge
More than half of the 10,000 Air Force Reserve Command personnel who have
been mobilized serve as a major span in the US air bridge moving troops, equipment,
and cargo to Southwest Asia.
Air Mobility Command planners began staging C-5 and C-130 aircraft through
Westover ARB, Mass., in early February. (See “Westover Surges for Gulf
Buildup,” above.) AFRC’s 445th Airlift Wing, Wright–Patterson
AFB, Ohio, serves as the staging point for AFRC C-141 missions.
In addition, other AFRC units support the air bridge. They include C-5 crews
from the 512th AW, Dover AFB, Del.; 433rd AW, Lackland AFB, Tex.; and 349th
Air Mobility Wing, Travis AFB, Calif. They also include C-17 crews from the
315th AW, Charleston AFB, S.C., and 446th AW, McChord AFB, Wash. AFRC tanker
units help the airlifters cross the Atlantic: KC-135 crews from the 434th Air
Refueling Wing, Grissom ARB, Ind., and 452nd AMW, March ARB, Calif.; KC-10
crews from the 514th AMW, McGuire AFB, N.J., and 349th AMW, Travis.
“ Light Benches” Wins
DOD announced on March 3 the winning design for the Pentagon memorial to honor
the 184 people killed by the terrorists who flew American Airlines Flight #77
into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001. The design is titled “Light Benches.”
Submitted by Julie Beckman and Keith Kaseman of New York, the design includes
184 benches, each with the name of a victim. The benches will be set according
to age, from the youngest at age 3 to the oldest at 71.
“ Basically, the memorial unit itself is a cast aluminum sculptural
element that does several things,” said Kaseman. “It’s a
reflecting pool that glows at night with light. It’s a slender cantilevered
bench surface that grows out of the ground and hovers over the ... glowing
light pool.” He added that it would include trees throughout, forming “a
canopy of light and shade and shadow.”
Beckman said they wanted to create a place that is welcoming to family and
friends of the victims but also a place for the nation. “It is a place
where two people can be or thousands of people can be,” she said.
The memorial will be built on 1.93 acres on Pentagon land near where the aircraft
struck the building. Officials estimate the cost could go up to about $7 million.
They said the money would not come from “taxpayers funds.”
Although located on Pentagon property, officials said it will be open to the
public. Mike Sullivan, manager of the Pentagon renovation program, said there
is commercial parking at the Pentagon City Mall with a breezeway under Interstate
395, and there’s Metro.
DIA Follows Speicher Leads
The director of the Defense Intelligence Agency told Congress that the agency
was pursuing leads as if missing Navy pilot Capt. Michael S. Speicher is “alive
and being held by the Iraqis.” The Iraqis know of his fate, said Vice
Adm. Lowell Jacoby.
“ They are not forthcoming with the information that they have available,” he
added.
Speicher was shot down during the 1991 Gulf War and listed as killed in action.
The Navy changed that classification to “missing/captured” in October
2002, based on new intelligence information.
On Feb. 11, Jacoby told the Senate Intelligence Committee that DIA had “a
number of leads” that it was pursuing “very aggressively.”
DOD Wants Own Civilian System
Pentagon officials want to take over the personnel system that governs DOD’s
more than 600,000 civilian personnel. This, they say, would help ease the bureaucracy.
“ Right now our military system is governed by us,” said Dov S.
Zakheim, DOD comptroller. “Our civilian personnel system, on the other
hand, is governed by everybody’s rules.”
He continued, “We believe we are in a unique situation. ... We need
to have a much more different, much more responsive civilian personnel management
system.”
The plan, said Zakheim, is to “go even beyond” what Homeland Security
got when Congress allowed the new department to set up its own personnel rules.
DOD wants the same fast-track approach, instead of having to come in “every
year with bits and pieces changes.”
He said DOD was finalizing proposals to go to Congress. Among possible changes
is removal of some positions that require Congressional confirmation and development
of a system that would give managers more flexibility in hiring and firing
and a means to reward performance rather than longevity.
The performance-reward approach falls in with the Bush Administration’s
2004 budget proposal to establish a special fund to boost the base pay for
the best workers. (See “Bush Pushes ‘Best Worker’ Pay,” March,
p. 14.)
Court Hears Agent Orange Case
The US Supreme Court on Feb. 26 began hearing arguments to decide whether
two veterans can sue the chemical companies that made Agent Orange years after
the companies settled a 1984 class action suit.
Neither Joseph Isaacson, an Air Force veteran, or Daniel Stephenson, a retired
Army helicopter pilot, was ill in 1984 or up to the deadline of 1994, so they
could not be party to the class action agreement. Since then, each has been
diagnosed with diseases believed to stem from Agent Orange exposure.
The 1984 agreement stipulated that no one who showed disease symptoms after
1994 would receive cash payments. Once all claims had been filed against the
$180 million fund, the remaining money went to research, counseling, and other
services to benefit veterans exposed to Agent Orange, a chemical defoliant
used extensively during the Vietnam War.
Supporters of the original agreement say overturning it could affect all past
class action judgments. However, veterans groups maintain the negotiated agreement
was legally flawed because it did not leave open a window for those not yet
manifesting illness. They also claim the lawyers for the chemical companies
knew a good deal when they saw it.
USAF, Navy Weather Join Forces
A shortage of personnel prompted the merger of an Air Force weather unit and
its Navy counterpart—both supporting Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.
Officials said the move has greatly improved morale, as well as operations.
It took only three weeks to develop training programs and complete the merger.
The weather community was concerned about how the two services would operate
together, given their different responsibilities, said 1st Lt.
Richard Stegronsky, the USAF weather flight commander. “So far, it’s
been extremely smooth,” he added.
His navy counterpart, Lt. Charlotte Welsch, said the joint operation also
aids continuity. “There are more people here to keep the knowledge base
strong and steady,” she said.
Concurrent Receipt Rises Again
Lawmakers have reintroduced legislation to provide military retirees with
full concurrent receipt rather than the limited compensation plan reached as
a compromise when Administration officials threatened a Presidential veto if
the full measure remained in the Fiscal 2003 defense bill.
Full concurrent receipt would enable all military retirees to receive both
retired pay and any disability pay they are due. Under the old rules, most
retirees have their pay offset by disability pay.
The 2003 defense bill authorized full restoration for certain categories of
retirees, such as those awarded Purple Hearts and those with combat-related
disability ratings of 60 percent or higher. Those eligible under the new provisions
could number about 30,000.
Regan Guilty, No Death Penalty
A federal jury in late February found Brian P. Regan, a retired Air Force
master sergeant, guilty of two counts of attempted espionage and one count
of gathering national defense information. The jury decided against imposing
the death penalty.
Regan, who had worked with the National Reconnaissance Office while on active
duty and later as a contractor, was arrested in August 2001 as he tried to
board a flight to Europe. He was charged with spying for China, Iraq, and Libya.
(See “Retired Airman Faces Death Penalty in Espionage Case,” June
2002, p. 18.)
Among the evidence against Regan was a letter to Saddam Hussein asking for
$13 million for secret information about US reconnaissance satellites. The
FBI found that letter and a similar one to Muammar Qaddafi on Regan’s
computer.
Regan now faces up to life in prison when he is sentenced in May.
Smallpox Reactions Called Rare
A DOD official said reactions among military members to smallpox vaccinations
have been rare—and all personnel have been treated and returned to work.
According to Col. John Grabenstein, deputy director for military vaccines
in the Office of the Army Surgeon General, there have been three serious reactions
and seven minor out of more than 100,000 military personnel who have received
the smallpox shots. He was speaking to the Institute of Medicine’s Committee
on Smallpox Vaccination Program Implementation on Feb. 13.
Grabenstein said two men contracted encephalitis—a serious inflammation
of the brain—and had to be hospitalized but had returned to duty. Another
man, an airman, had developed myocarditis—inflammation of the heart.
He was discharged from the hospital within two days. He also reported that
seven individuals developed serious rashes with pustules, but they were treated
as outpatients and returned to duty.
One of the men who had encephalitis had never received a smallpox shot before,
noted Grabenstein, while the other had been vaccinated previously. About 63
percent of those vaccinated in the military were receiving their first smallpox
shot.
Pentagon officials had previously reported that about three percent of those
vaccinated missed an average of 1.5 days of work because of common side effects,
such as fever, flat rashes, malaise, or swollen lymph nodes.
First DOD Web Survey Results In
Pentagon officials on Feb. 25 announced the results of DOD’s first active
duty status of forces survey (SOFS) via the Internet. DOD’s general conclusion:
Things are looking up.
Some 38,000 service members were surveyed last summer to assess their attitudes
toward a variety of personnel and policy issues. The response rate was 32 percent.
David Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, initiated
the Web–based SOFS, which will also be used to poll reservists and DOD
civilians.
According to the survey, 83 percent of active duty members were satisfied
with job security; 68 percent were satisfied with military values, lifestyle,
and tradition; and 67 percent with exchange and commissary availability. Although
respondents were less satisfied with housing (29 percent), pay (38 percent),
and family support programs (41 percent), officials said those numbers were
higher than in a 1999 survey.
Attitudes toward staying in the military were also higher than in 1999. The
percent of those who intend to remain in the service increased eight percentage
points and were even slightly higher for more junior members.
Day Petitions Supreme Court
Retired Col. George E. “Bud” Day’s petition on behalf of
World War II and Korean War era military retirees was placed on the US Supreme
Court docket Feb. 24. The court gave the government until March 26 to file
briefs, after which the court will decide if it will hear the case.
Specifically the case is William O. Schism and Robert L. Reinlie vs. United
States and involves government promises of lifetime health care for military
retirees. The government has not denied that promises were made, just that
they were not legally binding. (See “Editorial: Ghosts in the Machine,” January,
p. 2.)
Attorney Day, who is a Medal of Honor recipient, turned to the Supreme Court
when the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., last November overturned
a decision— that favored the retirees—made by a three-judge panel
of the appellate court in February 2001.
Day hopes to move the case to class action status, pending a favorable decision
by the Supreme Court.
Tricare Offers Provider Bonuses
This summer, DOD’s Tricare Management Activity plans to offer a 10 percent
bonus to providers in medically underserved areas. However, TMA must negotiate
this arrangement with its managed care contractors.
Supplementing basic reimbursement rates has been a standard practice for Medicare
in what it terms health professional shortage areas. Tricare will use Medicare’s
HPSA criteria to determine which providers may receive bonuses.
Low reimbursement rates are one reason some physicians have opted out of Tricare.
(See “Are There Enough Doctors in the House?” March, p. 46.)
EELV Boosts First DOD Payload
The Air Force on March 10 launched the first military satellite using an Evolved
Expendable Launch Vehicle—a Boeing Delta IV booster. The payload was
a Defense Satellite Communications System satellite.
The EELV program features two families of rockets developed jointly by the
Air Force and two contractors, Boeing and Lockheed Martin, that will be used
for commercial, as well as military launches. Both the Boeing Delta IV and
Lockheed Martin’s Atlas V flew their maiden missions with commercial
payloads last year.
USAF expects the EELVs to reduce the cost of spacelift operations.
School Funds Cut in Budget
President Bush’s Fiscal 2004 budget includes elimination of federal
impact aid—the money provided to local school districts to educate children
of military parents. The school districts lose tax revenue because of the presence
of the bases, which are tax-exempt federal properties.
The Administration proposal is to eliminate those children who do not live
on a military base from the impact aid calculations—saving about $125
million annually.
The cut is justifiable, according to Office of Management and Budget spokeswoman
Amy Call, because the school districts do get property taxes from those children
who live in private homes off base. She said the bases themselves also generate
revenue for the community.
The counter argument is that the bases themselves, which occupy, in many cases,
a large portion of some school districts, do not pay property taxes. That potential
revenue is lost.
The federal impact aid program was established during the Truman Administration.
Several Administrations since have proposed cuts to the program.
DOD Seeks Missile System Waiver
Included in the Administration’s 2004 defense budget is a request to
exempt the new missile defense system from operational testing required for
all new weapon systems. According to DOD, the waiver is needed so the system
can be fielded by 2004.
Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services
Committee, on March 6 told the Defense Writers Group, the request “is
going to be a very contentious issue.”
Lawmakers criticized the Administration last year when the Pentagon imposed
new secrecy rules on the missile defense system program. The Missile Defense
Agency maintained Congress would have the data it needs to keep watch on the
program. (See “MDA Secrecy Rule Under Fire,” July 2002, p. 16.)
If enacted, the testing waiver would mark the first time such leeway has been
granted for a major weapon system.
At a Feb. 13 Senate hearing, Levin asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
how he could justify the move. Rumsfeld replied, “I would justify it
very easily.”
He compared it to the use of the Predator unmanned aerial vehicle during Operation
Allied Force in 1999, before the UAV had completed testing. It was advantageous
to use it, he said, and it led to improvements.
He added that he did not think something has to be perfect before it’s
deployed if “reasonable people look at the situation” and conclude
it can be deployed. “In the case of missle defense, we need to get something
out there, in the ground, at sea, and in a way that we can test it, ... we
can evolve it.”
Levin’s response: “If it works.”
Guard Gains National Museum
The first museum dedicated to the National Guard, the oldest military organization
in the country, opened in Washington, D.C., on March 17.
The National Guard Memorial Museum is located at One Massachusetts Ave., N.W.,
one block west of Union Station. It occupies 5,600 square feet of the lower
level of the National Guard Association building. Admission is free.
The museum explores Guard history from its militia roots in 1607 to its support
to the war on terror today, according to a release from the National Guard
Educational Foundation, which operates the museum.
Bush Authorizes New Medals
President Bush signed an executive order March 12 authorizing DOD to create
two new medals to cover service in the global war on terrorism.
One is the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, which recognizes
service members who participate in an expedition to combat terrorism on or
after Sept. 11, 2001. Pentagon officials said this medal is limited to those
who deploy as part of Operation Enduring Freedom. They said personnel assigned
to operations in Afghanistan and the Philippines are examples of those who
may receive the award.
The second, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, recognizes service
in military operations to combat terrorism on or after Sept. 11, 2001. It applies
to those who participate in Operation Noble Eagle and who support Enduring
Freedom from outside the area of eligibility designated for the first medal.
These awards do not replace the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, established
Dec. 4, 1961, or the Armed Forces Service Medal, created Jan. 11, 1996. “Any
member who qualified for those medals by reason of service in operations to
combat terrorism between Sept. 11, 2001, and a terminal date to be determined
by the Secretary of Defense, shall remain qualified for those medals,” states
the executive order.
However, no one may be awarded more than one of the four medals for service
in the same approved expedition or operation, said officials, nor can individuals
receive more than one award of the two new medals.
Officials said it could take 12 months to produce and stock the medal.
Belated DFC Awarded to Flier
The Air Force earlier this year awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross posthumously
to B-24 pilot 2nd Lt. Lawrence Berkoff—59 years after his act of heroism
and sacrifice.
On Sept. 8, 1944, as Berkoff and his crew took off from Harrington Field in
England, on a mission across the English Channel. They didn’t get far
before they noticed that flames coming from engine No. 1 would make them perfect
targets. Berkhoff turned back to the field as No. 1 went out and engine No.
2 began to run rough and send out flames.
The B-24 began to lose altitude quickly. Berkhoff and his copilot struggled
to keep the aircraft level, but Berkoff soon realized it was impossible with
power on one side only. He ordered his crew to bail out. All made it, as could
have Berkoff. However, he remained with the rapidly descending, and now burning,
aircraft to guide it beyond an English village. The B-24 crashed just 200 yards
past Lambourn.
Senate Backs Nuclear Pact
The Senate on March 6 unanimously approved the nuclear arms treaty signed
by President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin in May 2002. The Treaty
of Moscow calls upon the two countries to reduce their nuclear arsenals by
nearly two-thirds.
The Russian parliament still has to approve the agreement.
The pact requires each nation to reduce its arsenals to between 1,700 and
2,200 warheads by Dec. 13, 2012. This will be the lowest level in decades.
Each side gets to determine the composition of its strategic nuclear force.
The US plans to retire all 50 of its 10 warhead Peacekeeper ICBMs and convert
four Trident submarines from strategic to conventional service. Some of the
excess warheads will become spares and some will be destroyed, according to
Administration officials.
News Notes
By Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor
- Japan announced in late February that it planned to launch its first two
spy satellites in early spring, with another two likely to follow this summer.
The satellites will give Japan its first capability to detect ballistic missile
launches. Since World War II, it has relied on the US for such data.
- North Korea on Feb. 26 conducted a flight test of a new long-range cruise
missile, reported the Washington Times. The missile, which has a range of
about 100 miles, is a variant of China’s HY-2 Silkworm missile. Initial
US intelligence reports mistakenly identified it as a Russian Styx anti-ship
missile whose range is 50 miles.
- Air Combat Command on March 11 announced cancellation of a Red Flag exercise
scheduled for that month at Nellis AFB, Nev., citing “emerging Air
Force deployment requirements.”
- US intelligence officials said Russia in February delivered additional
advanced Su-30MKK fighter–bombers to China and planned to deliver a
new air-to-ground missile—the AS-17X—as part of the aircraft
deal, according to the Washington Times. Other arms recently traded by Moscow
to China include Su-27 fighters, A-50 airborne warning and control aircraft,
and SA-10 and SA-15 surface-to-air missiles.
- USAF said a T-38 aircraft crashed on March 8 into two houses in Valparaiso,
Fla. The pilot had ejected safely, and no one on the ground was injured.
The pilot was from Holloman AFB, N.M., and flying a training mission near
Eglin AFB, Fla. A safety board is investigating the incident.
- Northrop Grumman delivered the seventh Global Hawk UAV—the final
advanced concept technology demonstration platform—to Edwards AFB,
Calif., on Feb. 14. The UAV is “the first true test aircraft and will
define future production models,” said Lt. Col. Michael Guidry, director
of the Global Vigilance Combined Test Force at Edwards. It contains a new
mission management computer and other improvements recommended after the
UAV’s early operational debut in Afghanistan. Northrop is slated to
deliver the first two production vehicles later this year.
- NASA on Feb. 18 released its top level requirements for the design of the
Orbital Space Plane, its name for a next generation system of space vehicles
that will be used for the transport of crews to and from the International
Space Station.
- Human error caused the Sept. 17, 2002, crash of an Air Force RQ-1 Predator
UAV in Southwest Asia, an Air Force investigation report concluded. The unmanned
reconnaissance aircraft was destroyed upon impact. No one on the ground was
injured. Air Force investigators determined that the pilot accidentally directed
the aircraft into hazardous weather, causing the flight control computers
to become disabled. The pilot re-established communications twice with the
aircraft, but it failed to respond to the pilot’s commands.
- A US–Russian panel on prisoners of war has used information from
Russia’s military archives to help identify seven of 51 American pilots
who were reported missing during the Vietnam War. Other identifications may
follow.
- The Air Force broke ground Feb. 20 for a new $15.5 million laboratory for
Air Force Research Laboratory’s Directed Energy Directorate at Kirtland
AFB, N.M. Called the Telescope and Atmosphere Compensation Laboratory, it
will support the directorate in its work on advanced optical research, laser
propagation, and space object imaging. The building, which is scheduled for
completion in April 2004, will provide space to design, construct, test,
and integrate experimental hardware for optical research, along with work
areas and office space for 84 scientists, engineers, and technicians who
are currently in portable trailers and buildings.
- Pentagon employees began training Feb. 25 in the use of emergency gas masks
to prepare for a possible biological or chemical attack. DOD began giving
its 24,000 workers the masks and is stockpiling hundreds in cafeterias and
other high-traffic areas. The masks have provided protection for about an
hour in testing and are designed to give wearers 15 to 30 minutes to flee
biological or chemical contaminated areas.
- DOD has certified four more National Guard Civil Support Teams to assist
civil authorities in response to a domestic weapons of mass destruction incident.
They are: 35th CST, St. Albans, W. Va.; 45th CST, Smyrna, Tenn.; 46th CST,
Montgomery, Ala.; 51st CST, Augusta, Mich. These four bring the total number
of certified teams to 31.
- Orbital Sciences on Feb. 6 successfully launched the first prototype of
the interceptor boost vehicle it is developing, testing, and manufacturing
for Boeing to support the Missile Defense Agency’s Ground-based Midcourse
Defense system. The booster launched from Vandenberg AFB, Calif., and flew
over the Pacific Ocean, reaching an altitude of 1,125 miles and traveling
about 3,500 miles. The launch verified vehicle design and flight characteristics,
gathered flight data, and confirmed performance of the propulsion system.
- A midair collision between two A-10s Feb. 18 over Cannon Gunnery Range
near Ft. Leonard Wood, Mo., resulted in minor damage to the two aircraft.
Neither pilot was injured and both flew their aircraft safely back to Whiteman
AFB, Mo. A board of officers is investigating the incident.
- The UK production version of the Eurofighter Typhoon made its maiden flight
Feb. 14, when it flew from the BAE Systems site at Warton, UK, for 21 minutes.
The other three Typhoon program participants—Germany (EADS Deutschland),
Italy (Alenia), and Spain (EADS-CASA) have already flown their production
versions. Initial deliveries of a total 620 aircraft are expected later this
year. Germany will receive 180; Italy, 121; Spain, 87; and UK, 232.
- Northrop Grumman on Feb. 23 successfully completed the first flight of
its Pegasus X-47A unmanned aerial vehicle, landing the experimental vehicle
at a predesignated point to simulate the ability to “catch” a
tailhook while landing on a carrier. The X-47A, which measures 27.9 feet
long, with a wingspan of 27.8 feet, serves as a test bed for Northrop’s
work on a naval unmanned aircraft under a Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency and Navy program.
- According to a USAF investigation report released Feb. 19, engine failure
caused an F-16C to crash Sept. 11, 2002, at Hattiesburg, Miss. The Air National
Guard pilot, from the 187th Fighter Wing, Dannelly Field, Ala., ejected safely,
receiving minor injuries. The fighter was destroyed upon impact, 1,300 feet
short of the runway at the airport in Hattiesburg. The engine’s high
pressure turbine post failed, allowing the turbine blades to break free and
damage the engine.
- Orbital Sciences announced Jan. 31 that it received a USAF contract to
provide space launch and missile defense target vehicles using deactivated
Peacekeeper ICBM assets. The contract could provide up to 41 launch vehicles
for a maximum value of $475 million.
- USAF announced Feb. 20 formation of a new Directorate of Innovation and
Transformation to consolidate, under a single director, Air Force logistics
transformation initiatives and information system integration. Grover Dunn,
former deputy director of maintenance, will head the new directorate, which
will fall under the Deputy Chief of Staff for Installations and Logistics.
- Northrop Grumman announced earlier this year it had conducted a successful
demonstration of a UAV system designed to deliver a variety of payloads to
multiple preprogrammed locations. The company derived the system from its
BQM-34 Firebee drone within eight weeks.
- Members of the 376th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron, Manas, Kyrgyzstan,
delivered $1,800 worth of goods to an orphanage in nearby Bishkek. The goods
included 70 comforters, 10 sets of bedsheets, five floor heaters, four cassette
tape players, clothes, and music and video tapes, as well as various other
supplies for the children. Squadron members raised the funds through direct
donations and fund-raising events, such as tournaments, craft sales, and
other activities.
- USAF named Pacific Air Forces the major command recipient of the 2002 Secretary
of the Air Force Safety Award. The 11th Wing, Bolling AFB, D.C., earned the
award in the direct reporting unit/field operating agency category. The Chief
of Staff Individual Safety Award went to MSgt. Shane B. Finders, 20th Air
Force, F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo.
- Officials at Electronic Systems Center, Hanscom AFB, Mass., announced Feb.
28 that USAF had designated its new multisensor command and control aircraft
the E-10A. ESC manages acquisition and development of the E-10A, intended
to be the central platform in USAF’s new command and control constellation.
(See “Seeking a Triple-Threat Sensor,” November 2002, p. 38.)
USAF awarded BAE Systems a $4.6 million contract to provide advanced identification,
friend or foe equipment for Block 25, 30, and 32 versions of USAF’s
F-16C aircraft. The total program, including options over the next five years,
is worth approximately $100 million.
- The National Inventors Hall of Fame announced a list of 17 inductees for
2003, including Theodore Von Karman, the 1944 chair of the Army Air Forces
Scientific Advisory Board, for his research and work in aerodynamics.
USAF
Outlines $4 Billion in Unfunded Priorities
The Air Force in February identified $4 billion worth
of programs the service would like to fund, if lawmakers make additional
money available during the Fiscal 2004 budget process.
The 66-item Unfunded Priority List “in no sense
is an alternative to the fundamental priorities of our President’s
budget,” wrote Air Force Secretary James G. Roche in the list’s
cover letter. The list was sent to the House Armed Services Committee
at the committee’s request.
The “wish list” highlights already planned
programs that could be accelerated or expanded if additional dollars
become available. The two top items alone total nearly $1 billion
and highlight the service’s growing need for additional money
for depot-purchased equipment maintenance and aircraft spares.
According to the supporting documentation, USAF’s
top unfunded requirements are:
1. DPEM. The service noted that depot-purchased
equipment maintenance funding is the lowest in 10 years, at 79 percent
of requirements. An additional $516 million would bring this program
back to historically effective levels and avoid “depot maintenance
backlogs on our critical weapon systems.”
2. Flying Hour Spares. The Air Force “faces
an extraordinary degree of uncertainty” about the actual operational
profile it will fly in Fiscal 2004, the list explains. The service “took
some risk” with its spares funding for the year, risk that
could be alleviated with $412 million.
3. Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection. USAF
explained that $140.7 million would improve the ability to mitigate
force protection concerns and begin “minimal investment” in
transformational technologies needed for long-term improvements.
4. Basic Expeditionary Airfield Resources. An
additional $149 million could be used to purchase equipment needed
to support beddown of deployed forces in austere locations where
infrastructure is lacking or destroyed or to augment existing sites.
5. Aircrew Life Support. The service
could use $50.6 million for additional panoramic night vision goggles,
ejection seat improvements, better parachutes, and new survival vests
and radios.
The Air Force then listed two options—lease and
accelerated buy—to handle its need to replace aging aerial
refueling aircraft. The lease option would give the service more
new tankers sooner and, according to USAF, for less money.
6A. Lease 100 KC-767A. This option
seeks $132 million to support a lease-to-buy arrangement for 67 KC-767A
tankers by Fiscal 2009 and a full complement of 100 new tankers by
Fiscal 2011.
6B. Accelerate KC-135 Replacement. If
the lease arrangement is not approved, this option seeks $154 million
to accelerate an existing KC-135 replacement program by two years.
This “potentially delivers 16 aircraft” by Fiscal 2009
and the complete fleet of 100 tankers by Fiscal 2014.
7. Distributed Ground Station Block 20.
The legacy intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance architecture
needs to be replaced, and $123.3 million would help “provide
decision quality information within time lines to impact the ‘kill
chain’ ” and transform the ground station infrastructure.
8. Rivet Joint Signals Intelligence Modernization.
Existing systems are reaching maximum capacity, and $5.5 million
would correct a signals intelligence collection gap by providing
for a host of new components and equipment upgrades.
9. Common Configuration Block 35. Currently,
three of USAF’s 14 Compass Call aircraft lack funding for the
Block 35 upgrade. The $15 million delta “exacerbates already
critical availability shortfalls” for the low-density, high-demand
aircraft.
10. Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar
System Production Shutdown. When the original 13-aircraft
Joint STARS program was increased in piecemeal fashion to 17 aircraft,
$20 million in production shutdown funding was not set aside. The
Air Force must pay this bill.
In his letter, Roche noted the Air Force has been careful to limit the
unfunded list to items that “can be executed in a timely manner
and that will not disrupt the program” laid out in the President’s
budget request.
— Adam J. Hebert
|
Despite
Complaints, USAF Declared Saudi–based CAOC
“
Fully Capable”
The Air Force continued to improve its combined air
operations center at Prince Sultan AB, Saudi Arabia, despite claims
that the center was unready to mount a major theater war.
A USAF Tiger Team issued a critical report last summer,
but its conclusions first surfaced in February in a Washington Times
article.
In response to questions from Air Force Magazine, USAF
said, “The PSAB CAOC is fully capable of effectively coordinating
and directing combat operations” and “is far more capable
than the operations centers used in Operations Desert Storm [1991]
and Allied Force [1999].”
The Tiger Team’s report stated that the CAOC “is
not currently poised to smoothly transition to an MTW.” It
identified 75 actions the service should take to enhance the center.
The service acknowledged in mid–March that so
far it had implemented 27 of the 75 changes the team recommended.
Gen. John P. Jumper, USAF Chief of Staff, dispatched
the team to Prince Sultan in May 2002 to “examine the manpower,
processes, and equipment required” to support air operations
for US Central Command. The team spent two weeks at 9th Air Force
headquarters at Shaw AFB, S.C., and PSAB and forwarded its findings
to Jumper on July 8.
A USAF spokeswoman said the team has met “on
multiple occasions since that time to update the status and close
action items generated” by the report.
Among the items noted by the team was “confusion
about roles, responsibilities, and chain of command.” It said
the CAOC operators were not sure who they should take direction from
or who they should consult to get things done. The different dynamics
of various operations (Northern Watch and Southern Watch in Iraq
and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan) “led to a somewhat
ad hoc organization optimized for none and not well suited to an
MTW–sized conflict,” the Tiger Team reported.
It also noted that intelligence reports were too widely
distributed within the CAOC, hindering coordination “and unity
of effort during execution.”
It pointed out that there was a sharp upturn in the
learning curve when many of the CAOC’s personnel rotated back
to other jobs all at once, forcing the center to constantly relearn
lessons. There was also mention of a cap on the number of people
who could be detailed to the CAOC—a limit imposed by host nation
Saudi Arabia—which hindered proper staffing.
The Air Force said it has implemented many of the easier
to fix items, such as changing schedules for CAOC personnel so that
outgoing people had time to “exchange information” with
their replacements.
Among “the most significant” changes USAF
said it first put into effect was a compilation “by name” of
all personnel who would staff the CAOC “to prosecute an air
campaign in Southwest Asia.” The listing includes personnel
from the rotational air and space expeditionary forces, the headquarters
of Central Command Air Forces and 9th Air Force, Air National Guard
augmentees, and joint and coalition liaison teams, “along with
interagency analysts to round out the warfighting team.”
USAF also took immediate steps to improve operator
orientation and theater training to help operators more clearly understand
roles and responsibilities. Personnel assigned to the CAOC also must
now complete the Joint Air Command and Control Course.
At the time of the team’s report, the Prince
Sultan CAOC was barely a year old. USAF said the report “highlighted
many organizational, process, and system improvements to sustain,
stabilize, and to institutionalize the CAOC and all air operations
centers.”
— John A. Tirpak
|
CMSAF
Thomas Barnes, 1930–2003
Retired Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Thomas
N. Barnes died March 17 in Sherman, Tex., from cancer. He was 72.
Barnes was the fourth person to be named to USAF’s
top enlisted post and the first black to hold such a position in
any of the military services. He served in that post from 1973 to
1977, when he retired.
Born in Chester, Pa., in 1930, Barnes entered the
Air Force in 1949, training at the Chanute AFB, Ill., aircraft engine
and hydraulics specialist school. He served as a hydraulics specialist
at McChord AFB, Wash., then was sent to Japan in 1952. Shortly after
arriving in Japan, he completed on-the-job training as a flight engineer
and served in both specialties because of a manning shortage.
Through 1965, Barnes served as a crew chief, flight
engineer, and senior controller on various aircraft, including the
B-25, B-52, C-45, and C-47.
In October 1966, he entered F-4 field training, and,
in December, he went to Southeast Asia, serving with the 8th Tactical
Fighter Wing until December 1967. He next served at the pilot training
base at Laughlin AFB, Tex., and, in 1971, Air Training Command selected
him as the command’s senior enlisted advisor.
After his retirement, he remained active in Air Force
matters and was often sought as a speaker at military functions.
Barnes once responded to a question in an interview: “I’d
like to be remembered as a role model for people who believe they
can’t get there.” He added that it was an honor to be
chosen as the Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force “on the
basis of my qualifications, as opposed to my race or my gender.”
|
End
Strength Issue Flares in Congress
In Congressional testimony on the Fiscal 2004 defense
budget, each of the service Chiefs described the increasing stress
that the high operations tempo is having on their personnel, especially
those in a few critical skills.
Yet, lawmakers pointed out that the Pentagon had failed
to include any significant end strength increases in the budget request.
Asked to explain the disparity, Air Force Chief of
Staff Gen. John P. Jumper said, “It’s not just a matter
of adding end strength.”
Jumper continued, “It’s a matter of making
efficiencies out of what you’ve got.” He said the Air
Force had identified more than 12,000 billets that do not require
a military member to fill them. These individuals will be reassigned
and, in some cases, retrained to critical career fields in need of
additional personnel. Those fields include force protection, combat
search and rescue, and special operations forces.
Jumper maintained that if the efficiencies the Air
Force is working “don’t do the job, I will be the first
to go back to the Secretary of Defense and ask for the relief that
we need.”
|
Lawmakers
Fear Reserve Forces Are Overused
A Congressional delegation’s recent visit to
US European Command facilities has added new focus to concerns that
the use of Guard and Reserve forces has reached a critical level.
In a Feb. 12 trip report, three Republicans and one
Democrat told Duncan Hunter (R–Calif.), House Armed Services
Committee chairman, that reserve forces are being overused. They
said the situation could lead to problems for both active duty and
reserve units in the future.
“ The Total Force policy is being implemented
in ways never anticipated,” according to the report, signed
by delegation leader Rep. John M. McHugh (R–N.Y.) and Reps.
Robin Hayes (R–N.C.), Mike McIntyre (D–N.C.), and Jeff
Miller (R–Fla.). They cited anecdotal evidence that the high
operating tempo may drive some reservists out of the military.
Reservists serving in EUCOM told the lawmakers during
their 10-day trip that “leaving the reserves is an increasingly
attractive option” and that some employers are beginning to
see reserve status as a liability in employees.
More than 188,000 reservists are on active duty (as
of March 12) to support the war on terrorism. Some have been serving
for longer than a year.
The lawmakers said they were impressed by the professionalism
and dedication of the EUCOM forces and heard “no explicit statements” that
the reservists would be unable to do what is asked of them.
They noted that “missions being performed by
reservists today are above a rate that is sustainable simply through
the reserve component volunteers.”
McHugh told the publication Congress Daily that EUCOM
commanders could not do their jobs without Guard and Reserve support. “We
need more men and women in uniform,” he said.
— AJH
|
USAF
Leaders Blast Anonymous Critics of War Strategy
Top Air Force officials condemned unnamed critics who
complained, in a Washington Times front page article, about a draft
Iraq air war plan.
The Feb. 13 article asserted that some senior military
officials, who said they were briefed informally on the target lists,
were concerned the Iraq war plan was too timid. They said it “would
largely spare infrastructure targets, such as bridges, and most,
if not all, telephone communications” from air attack, to limit
devastation for Iraqi citizens.
This restraint would leave ground forces facing tougher
defenses than necessary, they claimed. One official was quoted as
saying there were too many “political restrictions” being
placed on the air war plan.
USAF leaders quickly took aim at the critics.
“ People who make that comment are either ones
who were in on the planning and didn’t have the courage to
speak up at the time or those who are content not to know about the
plan in detail but take potshots from the shadows,” said Gen.
John P. Jumper, Chief of Staff, Feb. 13 at the Air Force Association’s
symposium in Orlando, Fla.
“ I have great concern about the professionalism
of officers who would comment in this way,” Jumper added. Officials
who would complain to the press are a “small minority of the
officers in our Air Force.”
Air Force Secretary James G. Roche echoed that sentiment
in remarks in Orlando Feb. 14. He said, “There is no such thing
as an informal war plan briefing ... and no such thing as an anonymous
Air Force officer.” If officials lack the courage to express
concerns through the chain of command, “they are not living
up to the standards of our Air Force.”
In a letter Jumper fired off to the newspaper, he noted
that the criticisms were “based on the musings of a single
anonymous source about classified contingency planning.” Jumper
added that in his 37 years of military service, he had never seen “an
environment of such joint cooperation and interservice communication.”
He continued: “The very best minds of each service
are working to maximize the combined effects of all our forces in
pursuit of victory. On that point—and unlike the shadow critic
who violates his or her oath even while presuming to represent other
airmen—I am willing to put my name and reputation on record.”
— AJH
|
USAF:
Jamming GPS Signals Won’t Work
Global Positioning System signals, which guide newer
US munitions to their targets, can be jammed, but not easily, and
not for long.
Efforts are under way both to make the signal broadcast
by GPS satellites more jam-resistant and to
reduce interference with GPS–guided munitions when they reach
the target area, according to Lt. Col. John Carter, USAF chief of
space requirements.
Carter said the service has been working “from
the day we built GPS” on ways to frustrate would-be jammers.
“ We’re very confident we can do that,” he
said.
An enemy hoping to use a GPS jamming signal to fool
weapons like the Joint Direct Attack Munition shouldn’t count
on success, Carter said.
For one thing, JDAMs also have inertial navigation
systems that helpthem guide their way to a target, so jamming the
GPS signal being received by JDAM is no gurantee the weapon will
go off course. Other weapons use laser or optical guidance, with
GPS signals as simply a backup.
Moreover, anyone transmitting a GPS–jamming signal “can
be found, and anyone who can be found can be targeted,” Carter
pointed out. He advised “bad guys” not to be the one
picked to jam a GPS signal. Reportedly, Iraq has obtained a number
of Russian–made transmitters that can spoof GPS signals.
The current generation of GPS IIR satellites already
have a measure of jam resistance, by which they can broadcast with
greater power if their signal is being jammed, according to Air Force
Undersecretary Peter B. Teets. He called this tactic “flexible
power.”
Teets added that “real improvement” will
come with GPS III, about 10 years from now. It will be “much
more jam-resistant on the satellite side, on the control-element
side, and on the user-equipment side.” The Air Force, he said, “is
doing the necessary smart things to enable GPS to serve us well.”
— JAT
|
Little
Belgium, Doing Its Level Best
The Belgian minister of defense rushed to support his
nation after the Wall Street Journal highlighted Belgium as a case
study in European military inefficiencies.
“ We refuse to squander our public funds for
the sole purpose of national glory, since we prefer to spend them
on social affairs, health care, and pensions for our fellow citizens,” Andre
Flahaut, Belgium’s defense chief, wrote in a Feb. 26 rebuttal.
The Feb. 13 Wall Street Journal article (“How
Europe’s Armies Let Their Guard Down”) noted that many
of NATO’s forces “are poorly equipped, in part because
so much money is spent on pay and benefits.” It went on to
say, “Belgium, for example, employs hundreds of military barbers,
musicians, and other personnel who aren’t likely to be called
into battle.
Yet Belgium doesn’t have the money to replace
aging helicopters or conduct regular combat training exercises.”
In his response, Flahaut said, “The primary mission
of our armed forces is to maintain the peace and to help the civilian
population (Belgian or foreign).”
Belgium does this “without being belligerent
or being convinced of having been elected by a higher authority to
keep watch over the world order,” he added.
Flahaut also objected to the Wall Street Journal’s
numbers. The newspaper said Belgium spends “some 67 percent
of its annual defense budget” on personnel and “only
about 5.4 percent” on equipment.
Flahaut said Belgium spends 62 percent on personnel
and 11 percent on equipment.
— AJH
|
USAF
Leaders Vow To Make Changes at Academy
The Air Force has been under fire from lawmakers, news
media, and parents of cadets since multiple allegations of rape,
cover-up, and retaliation against victims surfaced earlier this year
concerning the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo.
According to Sen. Wayne Allard (R–Colo.), as
of March 5, 25 female cadets—15 former and 10 current—had
complained to his office that they had been raped or sexually assaulted
at the academy. Some said they were ignored, punished, or shunned
for reporting the incidents, and some did not make reports for fear
of being ostracized or kicked out.
Allard was joined by Sen. John Warner (R–Va.),
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and several other
lawmakers in asking for investigations of the situation at the academy.
A working group, appointed by Air Force Secretary James
G. Roche and headed by USAF general counsel Mary L. Walker, began
gathering information at the academy Feb. 19. Walker’s group
is one of three elements in the investigation, Roche told members
of the House Armed Services Committee on Feb. 27. The second is a
review of each case by the DOD inspector general. The third is oversight
by the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness.
Roche also told the lawmakers that Air Force leaders
had first become “aware that something was grossly wrong when
we received an e-mail back in mid–December.” Before that,
he said, a Congressman had sent them a letter on a single case. The
e-mail signaled something “broader,” said Roche.
The Secretary then said that he and USAF Chief of Staff
Gen. John P. Jumper have a simple logic: “We must not commission
any criminal. We must not allow any cadet to take violence on another
cadet. ... We are also committed to ridding the academy of any cadet
who would knowingly harbor some cadet who has done this. ... We want
to rid the academy of any cadets who would shun any victim. ... We
will not tolerate this.”
Both Roche and Jumper have since visited the academy
and talked with cadets and staff. Amid some calls for removal of
the current academy leadership, both senior service leaders said
the problem did not start with the current leadership. Instead, they
pointed to budget and manpower restrictions that led the service
to make cutbacks in counseling training for staff officers. Roche
called the problems “a corporate responsibility.”
The service plans to implement major policy changes
before the arrival of the new class of cadets in June.
Roche and Jumper jointly sent letters March 13 to the
parents of incoming cadets, saying, “We’ve made it clear
to the cadets that all perpetrators, those who fail to act to prevent
assaults, those who knowingly protect perpetrators after the fact,
and those who would shun or harass anyone with the courage to come
forward and report these criminals, will be brought to justice.”
The service has set up a phone line for cadet victims
of sexual assault to report their assault directly to the Air Force
inspector general. Current and former cadets may call 703-588-1541
from 8 a.m.–4 p.m. (EST), Monday–Friday.
|
Proposals
on Joint Chiefs Hit Wall of Opposition
The Defense Department has canned draft proposals that
would have cut the terms of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and eliminated
Joint Staff autonomy. When lawmakers queried top Pentagon officials
about it in February, all asserted they had not seen the proposed
plan.
According to Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), a draft
of proposed legislation that circulated the Pentagon last fall called
for reducing the terms of the Joint Chiefs from four years to two,
with the option of a two-year renewal. That proposal was requested
in a memo signed by David Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel
and readiness.
The other proposal cited by Levin would have required
the Joint Staff to report to the Defense Secretary instead of to
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Approval for selections
to the Joint Staff would also have been shifted to the Secretary.
And the draft legislation, said Levin, “would strike the statutory
requirement that the Joint Staff be, quote, ‘independently
organized and operated.’ ”
When Levin asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
and JCS Chairman Gen. Richard B. Myers about the proposals at a Senate
Armed Services Committee hearing Feb. 13, both said they had not
yet seen the draft proposals. However, Rumsfeld noted that he and
Myers had “talked about” the way OSD and the JCS operate
and that they saw some duplications.
“ There might be a way to merge some of those
pieces in a way that did not in any way inhibit the Chairman’s
responsibility under law” to provide independent military advice
to the national command authority, Rumsfeld said.
At a Feb. 25 committee hearing, Levin asked each of
the service chiefs about the proposals. Each said they had not seen
the draft proposals but defended their four-year terms.
“ For a service chief, a longer-term perspective
is helpful,” said Army Chief of Staff Gen. Erik K. Shinseki.
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark agreed, saying, “There’s
a great learning curve in these assignments.
USAF Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper said that although
the Chiefs had not been briefed on the proposals, they did recently
discuss the issue with Rumsfeld. Jumper emphasized, “I would
think the Secretary would want his service chiefs in position long
enough to be able to make a difference and to establish rapport with
one another to be able to deal with the joint issues that we deal
with every day.”
A Feb. 27 InsideDefense.com article reported that the
proposals on the Joint Chiefs had been dropped.
—AJH
|
Will
USAF Get 150 FB-22 Bombers?
Air Force Secretary James G. Roche told lawmakers he
would like to have at least 150 FB-22s (a proposed bomber version
of the F/A-22) in addition to 381 F/A-22s.
At a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Feb.
27, committee chairman Rep. Duncan Hunter (R–Calif.) exclaimed
that the “extremely small present day bomber force of 21 B-2s,
76 B-52s, and 63 B-1s ... is a tragedy.” He then asked Roche, “If
you had your druthers and you had the money, what size bomber force
would you like to have today?”
The Air Force leader’s initial response was to
discuss types and numbers of targets. Hunter interrupted, saying, “I’m
not going to let you make the answer complex. ... You’ve got
a lot of deep strike requirements that may percolate real quickly.
How many bombers would you like to have?”
Roche said: “My definition of bombers, strike
systems: I would like to have the 21 B-2s we currently have. I would
like to have 60 of the B-1s with the [Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff
Missile] extended range on board.
I would like to have the chance to build the FB-22,
which has dramatic range, almost as much as the B-2 and that also
can defend itself, that has advances in stealth. I would like to
have 381 minimum F/A-22s, minimum of 150 FB-22s, and then I would
like to go to the next generation.”
|
DOD,
Army Officials Joust Over Iraq Numbers
The price of unseating the current Iraqi regime, setting
up a new government, occupying the country, and rebuilding its infrastructure
could cost as little as $10 billion and as much as $100 billion,
Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz told Congress on Feb.
26.
“ We have no idea what we will need until we
get there,” Wolfowitz told the House Budget Committee. He said
a major cost factor would be how many troops would be needed for
postwar occupation and how long they would stay.
The $100 billion figure he cited was a notional, in-house
Pentagon guess that assumed the very worst case scenarios, Wolfowitz
noted. But he specifically cited a figure of $95 billion as being
too high. He also said all such estimates ignored Iraq’s oil
revenues of up to $20 billion a year and discounted the contributions
that could be made by other countries.
Wolfowitz made his remarks as estimates of Iraqi reconstruction
as high as $300 billion swirled around Washington. (A senior Pentagon
official, briefing reporters on the Fiscal 2004 defense budget, said
DOD is notionally using a figure of about $20 billion a month for
combat and $10 billion a month for postwar occupation.)
While he insisted it is too early to guess how much
a regime change in Iraq would cost, Wolfowitz did contradict the
estimate of Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric K. Shinseki on how many
troops would be required for the postwar occupation.
During a Senate Armed Services Committee several days
earlier, when lawmakers pressed Shinseki to provide an estimate,
he said it would take “on the order of several hundred thousand
soldiers” to do the job. His answer carried some credibility
since he had been a commander of peacekeeping troops in the Balkans.
Wolfowitz, however, called Shinseki’s number “wildly
off the mark” and “highly suspect.” He argued that
a force for Iraq could be smaller and not stay as long. There is
no history of ethnic warfare in Iraq as there was in the Balkans,
Wolfowitz contended, despite the fact that the Iraqi government has
violently repressed both Kurds in the north and Shiite Muslims in
the south. Wolfowitz said Iraqi civilians will welcome American troops, “provided
they leave as soon as possible.”
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, at a press conference
the next day, said that the answer to the question posed to Shinseki
by the committee “is not knowable.”
“ We have no idea how long the war will last,” Rumsfeld
said. “We don’t know to what extent there may or may
not be weapons of mass destruction used. We don’t ... have
any idea whether or not there would be ethnic strife. We don’t
know exactly how long it would take to find weapons of mass destruction
and destroy them. ... There are so many variables that it is not
knowable.”
He went on to say, though, that he, too, thought Shinseki’s
number was “off the mark” and “simply not the case.”
It’s “not logical to me that it would take
as many forces ... following the conflict, as it would to win the
war,” Rumsfeld asserted. He also said several countries have
volunteered forces for “stabilization activities,” which
would reduce the number of US troops needed.
—JAT
|
DOD
Intel Chief Says He Will Stay in His Lane
Stephen A. Cambone, the Pentagon’s newly minted
Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, assured lawmakers he
will not be a rival to the Director of Central Intelligence.
Sen. Carl Levin (D–Mich.), ranking member on
the Senate Armed Services Committee, supported creation of the position,
but he noted that critics claim the job is evidence of Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld’s “contest” with DCI George
H. Tenet “for dominance over American intelligence operations.”
At the nomination hearing on Feb. 27, Levin asked Cambone
to answer those critics who have said it is Rumsfeld’s bid
to create “another Director of Central Intelligence, for all
practical purposes.”
Cambone insisted that the new undersecretary post—which
oversees the National Security Agency, National Imagery and Mapping
Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and others—is not intended
as a “substitute” for the DCI. Instead, he said, it will
give the DCI a single point of contact at the Pentagon.
The office will focus on getting “customer” questions
answered and needs addressed in the collection and analysis process,
said Cambone.
He noted that a key customer question, one that Rumsfeld
has raised, concerns how the Pentagon agencies and other intelligence
agencies arrived at their conclusions and what their sources of information
were.
These are the kinds of questions the Secretary of
Defense tends to ask about “finished intelligence,” said
Cambone, and the answers are necessary to help Pentagon leadership
act on the information they receive.
Cambone emphasized, though, that his office “is
not being structured to do analysis.”
His job, he said, is to provide single-point leadership
to disparate intelligence organizations within the Defense Department.
The impetus behind creation of the office is to streamline DOD’s
approach to intelligence matters, such that his office will be able
to respond to any DCI “needs that can be satisfied by the Department
of Defense ... with alacrity.”
He added, “There have been occasions in the past—which
I am sorry to say—when that has not always been the case.”
—JAT
|
Copyright Air Force Association. Allrights reserved.