The Navy Contribution
"The Navy contribution to ... the air campaign
in Kosovo, although low profile, was nonetheless very
significant. The Tomahawk shooters, in and of themselves,
destroyed nearly 50 percent [of the] fixed target list
in key categories such as the Serb army and police
headquarters. ... We were able to keep nine Tomahawk
shooters in-theater. Those nine sustained the air campaign
in the first couple of weeks when the laser-guided
bomb droppers could not find targets because of bad
weather. And if it hadn't been for those nine, we would
have stalled."
"The [carrier] Theodore Roosevelt ...
arrived 14 days after the start [of hostilities]. Nonetheless,
with only 8 percent of the total dedicated aircraft
[deployed by NATO], [it was] credited with 30 percent
of the validated kills against fielded forces in Kosovo."
What Might Have Been
"I don't know what [would have been the] specific
impact [of] having had that air wing off the coast
[of Yugoslavia] the first 14 days, when General Clark
[Army Gen. Wesley K. Clark, NATO Supreme Allied Commander
Europe] was looking so hard for a means of stopping
and slowing the slaughter in Kosovo, but I frankly
believe that it would have been significant. ... A
carrier and a carrier air wing, from the outset, would
have made a significant difference, I believe."
"Tension" Over Competing Needs
"There was a tension between two competing requirements,
especially in the first month of the war. That was
to meet the demands of the strategic air campaign to
go after targets that count in Serbia proper and then,
at the same time, [commit] sufficient air assets to
apply pressure to the Serb forces and to the [Serb
police] forces that were then, with full impunity,
continuing to burn and pillage villages."
"Had it been possible to get Theodore Roosevelt
on scene on Day 1, my expectation is that air wing
would have been applied directly into Kosovo, would
have met the [commander in chief's] Day 1 requirement
from the very outset, [and applied] considerable pressure
to deny movement ... to those forces that were conducting
the ethnic cleansing. So, yes, sir, I think it would
have made a difference."
Putting the Serbs at Risk?
"It took two weeks to get [Theodore Roosevelt]
there. ... [It] began dropping bombs on the very first
day [it was] there. In those two weeks, as you all
well remember, we were unable in any way to slow the
... atrocities and the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.
General Clark wanted badly to get airpower in there
to stop, to at least put at risk, these forces. There
was no guarantee it would have stopped it, but what
was going on was being done with relative impunity.
If that carrier had been there in those first two weeks,
it would have made a difference."
Air Tasking Order Limitations
"The ATO process, with large numbers of aircraft,
is a procedural, sequential, rigid process. It is not
able to react inside 24 hours, and it's simply an asset
management tool. We had almost 900 aircraft, including
tankers and support aircraft, ... and you have to make
sure all of these airplanes don't run into each other.
... That all leads to a fairly unresponsive capability.
"Air Force doctrine is very clear in how it goes
after an air campaign, and the ATO is really intended
to service a preplanned campaign. It does that very
well. When the adversary doesn't behave the way the
air campaign had anticipated, though, a wheel can come
off.
"We never neutralized the IADS [Integrated Air
Defense System]. We weren't any safer on Day 78 than
we were on Day 1. The [Air Force] doctrine calls for
neutralizing the IADS before taking on the targets
that count. Well, if we had followed that doctrine
to the letter, we would have pounded nothing but IADS
for 78 days. So Mike Short [Lt. Gen. Michael C. Short,
USAF, Joint Forces Air Component Commander] did, of
course, the sensible thing, as you would expect him
to do, and he deviated from strict doctrine."
Same-Day Service
"The [Theodore Roosevelt] air wing had 74 aircraft.
When something had to be struck the same day--the target
was directed in the morning and it had to be struck
some time that day--two systems could do it: the carrier
air wing and the Tomahawk. Nothing else could, and
that's just a fact, and General Clark would validate
that."
The Podgorica Airfield
"The Podgorica airfield is a good example. Podgorica
was threatening the introduction of [the US Army's]
Task Force Hawk into Albania because it was only about
30 miles across the border. It was a Serb air base,
and the Serbs had moved a significant number of air-to-ground
aircraft ... into that airfield.
"When we detected that move, General Clark that
morning said, 'I have to have that airfield taken out
now. We cannot afford a strike, even an ineffective
strike, against Task Force Hawk just across the border.'
He turned to General Short and said, 'Can you do it?'
and General Short said, 'The Navy can do it.' This
was on a video teleconference. He [Clark] turned to
me and said, 'Dan, can you do it?' and I said, 'Yeah,
we can do it.'...
"We put 48 airplanes in the air that afternoon
and took out the entire airfield, including the underground
tunnel complex that had 26 airplanes in it, and we
emulsified every one of them, and [our crews] were
home for dinner aboard that carrier."
Quicker to React
"This is what the Navy does. ... [Navy] air wings
are trained to, within a matter of hours, plan a significant
strike. ... This in not, in any way, finding fault
with the Air Force. The Air Force was working three
days down the road, figuring how they are going to
take out all of the bridges, and that's what they do.
Air campaigns are the Air Force's business. If you
want to take something out quickly, that's what the
Navy is particularly good at, in terms of airpower."
Hitting Moving Targets
"We had nine Tomahawk platforms rotating through
the Adriatic. And we had preplanned just about everything
that didn't move, and then we started preplanning things
that did move. For example, the SA-3 sites. ... They
knew we didn't fly during the day for the first several
weeks. So they had daytime sanctuary, and, at night,
they moved them around so we couldn't get a good fix
on 'em.
"So we tracked where they had been. There are
only so many places that you can put an SA-3. We targeted
all of that ground, basically. Then, we'd get an Elint
[electronic intelligence] hit, get an overhead image,
we'd drive a U-2 over the top of it, snap it to see,
yeah, it's there. ... The Tomahawk would leave the
tube of a submarine or the vertical launcher on one
of our surface combatants. Forty-five minutes later,
we took that out. We had 85 percent kill rate on relocatable
targets, with Tomahawks."
Left Free to Roam
"Throughout Kosovo, we were watching basically
three different prongs of [Serbian] attack against
villages. ... We knew where they were going; just follow
the burning villages. ... Had we had the airpower there
to do it--we didn't at the time, because we were concentrating
principally on IADS--we could have gone after the roads.
[That's] what we ended up doing, basically, two weeks
later. We took them off the roads. After the first
couple of days, they could no longer use the roads.
Then they would go into hiding during the day and try
to move at night. By denying them mobility, all by
itself, we would have slowed down the ethnic cleansing."
Cross Purposes
"General Clark wanted to do both [hitting tactical
and strategic targets], and General Short said, 'I
don't have enough to do both. Be patient, here. Let
me get this out of the way (this being principally
the IADS), ... and then I'll go after these fielded
forces that you want me to hit, General.'
"When that carrier [Theodore Roosevelt]
was one day out of Norfolk, I called the battle group
commander and told him, 'Be prepared to go after fielded
forces, and be prepared to fly during the day.' ...
[The commander] didn't like either one of those comments,
but they rolled in. Of all the sorties they flew, not
even 5 percent were outside of Kosovo. From the day
they got there, they were going after fielded forces
in Kosovo. ... Hitting the fielded forces would have
helped."