|
GPS offers support for a host of vital military
operations. The system provides position and
elevation information used by engineers building
an aircraft parking ramp in the desert and data
used by search and rescue personnel to name a
few. Perhaps most importantly, GPS has transformed
USAF munitions capabilities by providing the
basis for unmatched all-weather Precision Guided
Munitions, such as 2,000-pound JDAMs.
|
On Feb. 22, 1978, the first Block I Navstar Global
Positioning System satellite was launched from Vandenberg
AFB, Calif. The event received little notice in the
press. At the time, even many Pentagon officials were
not exactly sure what this unheralded new system would
do. They were aware of its capabilitythe provision
of pinpoint location informationbut had little
idea how that could be exploited to increase the effectiveness
of United States forces.
Twenty-five years later, they have figured it out,
and GPS has become one of the most successful and versatile
high-technology projects of all time. Conceived as
a navigational aid for ships, it is now a sort of sextant
to the world, as important in its own way as the discovery,
in the 18th century, of means of measuring longitude
at sea. It has also turned out to be one of the most
important US government investments in space, creating
a $30 billion a year civilian market in GPSrelated
devices.
For the military, GPS has been revolutionary, taking
the search out of search and rescue, guiding
troops through trackless deserts, andperhaps
most importantlyproviding US airpower with the
basis for unmatched all-weather Precision Guided Munitions.
For PGMs, GPS capability is as much of an advance
over laser guidance as laser guidance was over dumb bombs,
noted Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, last year.
When the Global Positioning System was being
developed and first deployed, no one was talking about
using it for bombing, Myers told the Senate Armed
Services Committee. It was seen as a better navigational
tool.
Beyond Navigation
So, essentially, weve linked incremental
improvements in several different technologies to achieve
today our precision-strike capability, with accuracy
that I believe amounts to truly transformational change.
Todays Global Positioning System is a constellation
of satellites that beams navigational data to anyone
in the world with the proper equipment to receive it.
The satellites travel in 12-hour circular orbits at
an altitude of approximately 12,500 miles above Earth,
in six different orbital planes. There are four operational
satellites to a plane, spaced so that a user on the
ground will typically have access to the signal from
a minimum of five different birds at any
one time.
The GPS satellites are, in essence, extremely accurate
clocks in the sky. They broadcast precise time information
toward the ground via coded radio transmissions, which
are picked up by receivers that can range from small
handheld units to the guidance systems of ballistic
missiles.
The receivers calculate how long it has taken them
to receive the radio pulses from different GPS satellitesand
use the barely perceptible differences in time to figure
out a position on the face of the Earth, as well as
velocity at which one is traveling.
The signals are so accurate that time can be determined
within a millionth of a second and speed within a fraction
of a mile per hour. Location can be pinpointed to within
33 feet.
The devices can do this, that is, if the US allows
such accuracy. GPS in fact broadcasts two different
kinds of signalsa Coarse/Acquisition code intended
for civilian use and an encrypted Precision code for
the US military. If necessary, the Pentagon can induce
an error into the C/A signal, decreasing accuracy to
330 feet or so. In practice, the military has been
reluctant to engage in this dilution, partly because
civilian receivers have been a lifeline for individual
soldiers in the past.
On May 1, 2000, President Clinton ordered that this
intentional error, known as selective availability,
be turned off. Turning it back on would require Presidential
authorization.
The Navy Heritage
Mans desire to guide himself safely across the
trackless ocean has long been an engine of scientific
advance. Mariners needs have led to everything
from the development of astronomy to accurate chronometers
and radio navigation. Thus, it is perhaps unsurprising
that the GPS story began with a Navy programa
simple, reliable system named Transit.
The first Transit satellite was launched in 1960.
(A prototype was launched in 1959 but failed to reach
orbit.) Developed by the Johns Hopkins University Applied
Physics Laboratory, the system eventually consisted
of seven low-altitude polar-orbiting satellites. Users
could figure out their position on Earth by measuring
the Doppler shift of the satellites extremely
stable radio transmissions.
But navigation by Transit required a long observation
time, as well ascorrection for velocity. Coverage was
limited, because the US launched only a few satellites.
Position data covered only two dimensions. Overall,
it was not useful for such fast-moving vehicles as
aircraft.
So both the Air Force and Navy began working on more
sophisticated techniques. The Navys contribution
was an experimental satellite program named Timation.
The Air Forces was a design concept eventually
named System 621B, which drew from pioneering work
done by The Aerospace Corporation and its renowned
founding president, Ivan A. Getting.
By 1970, all of the services were working on navigation
systems intended to provide all-weather, around-the-clock,
three-dimensional position data. Eventually, the Defense
Department leadership moved to rationalize the research.
In April 1973, DOD tapped the Air Force to lead a multiservice
programthe Defense Navigation Satellite System.
DNSS blended the Air Forces proposed signal
structure and frequency with the Navys satellite
orbits and atomic clock research. The result, whose
development was approved in December 1973, is the system
known today as the Navstar GPS. The Air Force launched
11 GPS development satellites, designated Block I,
between 1978 and 1985. Midway through this series,
designers added nuclear explosion detectors to aid
in verification of treaty compliancea subsidiary
mission of GPS spacecraft that continues to this day.
Eventually all Block I satellites failed as their atomic
clocks or attitude-control system ceased functioning.
Most, however, lasted much longer than their design
life of three to five years.
Surviving Budget Cuts
GPS development was not always smooth. In 1979, the
systems planned 1981 to 1986 budget was cut by
30 percent. In 1986, the loss of the space shuttle
Challenger resulted in a 24-month delay in the launch
of the first Block II operational satellite (which,
like Block Is, were built by Rockwell). That convinced
the GPS Joint Program Office to switch from shuttles
to Delta II rockets as its primary means of access
to space.
The 24th Block II was launched in March 1994, completing
the GPS constellation. The Defense Department, along
with the Department of Transportation (the overseer
of GPS civilian use) formally declared that the system
had reached Initial Operational Capability in a Dec.
8, 1993, announcement.
Today GPS is able to support a wide variety
of operations, including aerial rendezvous and refueling,
all-weather airdrops, instrument landings, minelaying
and minesweeping, antisubmarine warfare, bombing and
shelling, photomapping, range instrumentation, rescue
missions, and satellite navigation, concludes
an Air Force Space Command Space and Missile Systems
Center history of the system. However, there is a big
difference between inherent capability and translation
of that capability into increased military effectiveness.
US armed forces had to learn to use and appreciate
GPS.
When it first came on board, about 1991, I recall
that some of the services didnt want it at the
time and didnt have a use for it, said
retired Gen. Donald J. Kutyna, former Commander in
Chief of US Space Command. Now the world relies
entirely on GPS systems.
Two major factors hampered service assimilation of
the GPS system.
One was its status as a support system, as opposed
to a weapon. It did not have a history of well-defined
operational concepts, noted a Rand study of GPS usage.
Its value is not as obvious as that of a new tank or
aircraft model.
Second was its status as a joint program. While the
Global Positioning System had some eager supporters
in all the services, top generals had to be sold on
the need to part with scarce funds. No one wanted to
shoulder the burden of paying the entire cost of something
that would benefit everyone.
Thus GPS had service support difficulties, according
to Rand. In budget negotiations, it was zeroed out
by the services in 1980, 1981, and 1982, only to be
reinstituted by the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
It appears that OSD support contributed to the
survival of the program, said the Rand report.
It was the Gulf War that really opened the eyes of
the services. GPS navigation proved to be a revolutionary
advance in desert warfare. Ground units found GPS extremely
useful for finding their way through the featureless
Gulf terrain, so much so that the GPS Program Office
had to make emergency buys of small, lightweight GPS
receivers. By the end of the war, GPS equipment was
affixedsometimes with tapeto the instrument
panels of everything from Humvees to F-16s, KC-135s,
and B-52s.
For the first time, operational US commanders were
using GPS and other space systems in their daily decision-making.
That led to a new appreciation of space as a factor
integral to USAF operations, according to Air Force
Space Command officials.
Almost Indispensable
A few years later, the air war over Kosovo showed
many that GPS was much more than an electronic direction
finder. In the Gulf, generally clear weather and open
spaces had been an optimal environment for laser-guided
weapons. In the cloudy, rainy Balkans, lasers were
often blocked, and GPSguided munitions came into
their own.
It got to the point where they [GPSguided
weapons] were almost indispensable, said Gen.
Lester L. Lyles, now commander of Air Force Materiel
Command, not long after the war. Everything that
a warfighter, or CINC, or war planner is trying to
do relative to attacking targets has become more and
more dependent on precision-guided weapons. We saw
the beginning of this during Desert Storm and saw it
in spades over Kosovo.
Civilian use of GPS developed in a pattern similar
to that of military use. Application after application
was added as more and more people understood what it
could do.
The first US government dictum about GPS civilian
use came in response to an enormitythe 1983 downing
of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 by Soviet fighters after
it inadvertently strayed into Soviet airspace. In response,
President Reagan announced that the new Global Positioning
System upon its completion would be made available
for international civilian users. In 1987 the Department
of Transportation set up its office for responding
to civil GPS users and working with the Defense Department
on GPS policy.
The first GPS civilian market, however, was not airlines
but surveyors. Their need for accuracy made GPS invaluable,
and surveyors demand for receivers led to R&D
and production efficiencies that lowered prices and
opened up further markets.
Today, handheld GPS equipment guides hikers through
the wilderness. Panel-mounted receivers guide luxury
cars down streets unfamiliar to their owners. Geologists
use GPS data to measure minute movements in the Earths
crust, with an eye to better understanding of the location
of earthquake zones. Even farmers use GPS to help them
grade their land to precise slopes and apply fertilizers
and seed in patterns designed to maximize yields.
Of course, ships and airliners use GPS, too, to the
point where President Clinton felt it necessary to
reaffirm the US commitment to provide the signals to
the international community, free of direct-user fees,
in a letter to the International Civil Aviation Organization
in 1995.
In the war on terrorism, GPS has been woven into operational
concepts in ever more complex ways. Secure in the systems
accuracy, airmen have dropped ordnance on enemy units
within 75 feet of friendly positions. GPS positioning
data from Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, integrated
with real-time video, have been data linked directly
to strike aircraft, enabling them to hit targets of
opportunity within minutes.
Even Greater Accuracy
Over the years, there have been advances in the systems
capability. Since 1997 the system has been upgraded
with Block IIR satellites, which officials say opened
a new era in GPS performance.
Even after five years in orbit, the Block IIR models
are maintaining a signal-in-space accuracy of better
than 3.3 feet, according to US officials.
Current plans call for upgraded Block IIF satellites
to be placed in orbit beginning in 2005. Per Presidential
order, Block IIF will add a third civil frequency for
all users. The GPS joint program office ordered its
first batch of long-lead parts for Block IIF last March;
maker Boeing has a contract for six satellites, with
a US option for six more.
Funds for a next-generation GPS III are in current
budgets. Scheduled to be launched around 2012, GPS
III would feature further improvements in signal power
sufficient, perhaps, to dampen the concern among some
service users that GPS use for guided munitions could
be thwarted by an adversary jamming the signal.
The military has made noises about civilian entities
chipping in to share GPS cost. After all, 90 percent
of users are outside the armed forces.
But whoever pays for it, GPS is likely to become only
more important to US commanders in the years ahead.
In spite of the fact that we are using the word precision now,
I think we are going to become even more precise as
we get more and more refined capabilities, said
Lyles. GPS has been very helpful, but we are
going to try to find ways to make that precision even
tighter to accomplish the job.
Copyright Air Force Association. All rightsreserved.
|