
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
GPS offers support for a host of vital military operations. The system provides position and elevation information used by engineers building an aircraft parking ramp in the desert and data used by search and rescue personnel to name a few. Perhaps most importantly, GPS has transformed USAF munitions capabilities by providing the basis for unmatched all-weather Precision Guided Munitions, such as 2,000-pound JDAMs. |
On Feb. 22, 1978, the first Block I Navstar Global Positioning System satellite
was launched from Vandenberg AFB, Calif. The event received little notice in
the press. At the time, even many Pentagon officials were not exactly sure what
this unheralded new system would do. They were aware of its capabilitythe
provision of pinpoint location informationbut had little idea how that
could be exploited to increase the effectiveness of United States forces.
Twenty-five years later, they have figured it out, and GPS has become one of
the most successful and versatile high-technology projects of all time. Conceived
as a navigational aid for ships, it is now a sort of sextant to the world, as
important in its own way as the discovery, in the 18th century, of means of
measuring longitude at sea. It has also turned out to be one of the most important
US government investments in space, creating a $30 billion a year civilian market
in GPSrelated devices.
For the military, GPS has been revolutionary, taking the search
out of search and rescue, guiding troops through trackless deserts, andperhaps
most importantlyproviding US airpower with the basis for unmatched all-weather
Precision Guided Munitions.
For PGMs, GPS capability is as much of an advance over laser guidance as laser
guidance was over dumb bombs, noted Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, last year.
When the Global Positioning System was being developed and first deployed,
no one was talking about using it for bombing, Myers told the Senate Armed
Services Committee. It was seen as a better navigational tool.
Beyond Navigation
So, essentially, weve linked incremental improvements in several different technologies to achieve today our precision-strike capability, with accuracy that I believe amounts to truly transformational change.
Todays Global Positioning System is a constellation of satellites that
beams navigational data to anyone in the world with the proper equipment to
receive it.
The satellites travel in 12-hour circular orbits at an altitude of approximately
12,500 miles above Earth, in six different orbital planes. There are four operational
satellites to a plane, spaced so that a user on the ground will typically have
access to the signal from a minimum of five different birds at any
one time.
The GPS satellites are, in essence, extremely accurate clocks in the sky. They
broadcast precise time information toward the ground via coded radio transmissions,
which are picked up by receivers that can range from small handheld units to
the guidance systems of ballistic missiles.
The receivers calculate how long it has taken them to receive the radio pulses
from different GPS satellitesand use the barely perceptible differences
in time to figure out a position on the face of the Earth, as well as velocity
at which one is traveling.
The signals are so accurate that time can be determined within a millionth
of a second and speed within a fraction of a mile per hour. Location can be
pinpointed to within 33 feet.
The devices can do this, that is, if the US allows such accuracy. GPS in fact
broadcasts two different kinds of signalsa Coarse/Acquisition code intended
for civilian use and an encrypted Precision code for the US military. If necessary,
the Pentagon can induce an error into the C/A signal, decreasing accuracy to
330 feet or so. In practice, the military has been reluctant to engage in this
dilution, partly because civilian receivers have been a lifeline for individual
soldiers in the past.
On May 1, 2000, President Clinton ordered that this intentional error, known
as selective availability, be turned off. Turning it back on would require Presidential
authorization.
The Navy Heritage
Mans desire to guide himself safely across the trackless ocean has long
been an engine of scientific advance. Mariners needs have led to everything
from the development of astronomy to accurate chronometers and radio navigation.
Thus, it is perhaps unsurprising that the GPS story began with a Navy programa
simple, reliable system named Transit.
The first Transit satellite was launched in 1960. (A prototype was launched
in 1959 but failed to reach orbit.) Developed by the Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory, the system eventually consisted of seven low-altitude
polar-orbiting satellites. Users could figure out their position on Earth by
measuring the Doppler shift of the satellites extremely stable radio transmissions.
But navigation by Transit required a long observation time, as well ascorrection
for velocity. Coverage was limited, because the US launched only a few satellites.
Position data covered only two dimensions. Overall, it was not useful for such
fast-moving vehicles as aircraft.
So both the Air Force and Navy began working on more sophisticated techniques.
The Navys contribution was an experimental satellite program named Timation.
The Air Forces was a design concept eventually named System 621B, which
drew from pioneering work done by The Aerospace Corporation and its renowned
founding president, Ivan A. Getting.
By 1970, all of the services were working on navigation systems intended to
provide all-weather, around-the-clock, three-dimensional position data. Eventually,
the Defense Department leadership moved to rationalize the research. In April
1973, DOD tapped the Air Force to lead a multiservice programthe Defense
Navigation Satellite System.
DNSS blended the Air Forces proposed signal structure and frequency with
the Navys satellite orbits and atomic clock research. The result, whose
development was approved in December 1973, is the system known today as the
Navstar GPS. The Air Force launched 11 GPS development satellites, designated
Block I, between 1978 and 1985. Midway through this series, designers added
nuclear explosion detectors to aid in verification of treaty compliancea
subsidiary mission of GPS spacecraft that continues to this day. Eventually
all Block I satellites failed as their atomic clocks or attitude-control system
ceased functioning. Most, however, lasted much longer than their design life
of three to five years.
Surviving Budget Cuts
GPS development was not always smooth. In 1979, the systems planned 1981
to 1986 budget was cut by 30 percent. In 1986, the loss of the space shuttle
Challenger resulted in a 24-month delay in the launch of the first Block II
operational satellite (which, like Block Is, were built by Rockwell). That convinced
the GPS Joint Program Office to switch from shuttles to Delta II rockets as
its primary means of access to space.
The 24th Block II was launched in March 1994, completing the GPS constellation.
The Defense Department, along with the Department of Transportation (the overseer
of GPS civilian use) formally declared that the system had reached Initial Operational
Capability in a Dec. 8, 1993, announcement.
Today GPS is able to support a wide variety of operations, including
aerial rendezvous and refueling, all-weather airdrops, instrument landings,
minelaying and minesweeping, antisubmarine warfare, bombing and shelling, photomapping,
range instrumentation, rescue missions, and satellite navigation, concludes
an Air Force Space Command Space and Missile Systems Center history of the system.
However, there is a big difference between inherent capability and translation
of that capability into increased military effectiveness. US armed forces had
to learn to use and appreciate GPS.
When it first came on board, about 1991, I recall that some of the services
didnt want it at the time and didnt have a use for it, said
retired Gen. Donald J. Kutyna, former Commander in Chief of US Space Command.
Now the world relies entirely on GPS systems.
Two major factors hampered service assimilation of the GPS system.
One was its status as a support system, as opposed to a weapon. It did not
have a history of well-defined operational concepts, noted a Rand study of GPS
usage. Its value is not as obvious as that of a new tank or aircraft model.
Second was its status as a joint program. While the Global Positioning System
had some eager supporters in all the services, top generals had to be sold on
the need to part with scarce funds. No one wanted to shoulder the burden of
paying the entire cost of something that would benefit everyone.
Thus GPS had service support difficulties, according to Rand. In budget negotiations,
it was zeroed out by the services in 1980, 1981, and 1982, only to be reinstituted
by the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
It appears that OSD support contributed to the survival of the program,
said the Rand report.
It was the Gulf War that really opened the eyes of the services. GPS navigation
proved to be a revolutionary advance in desert warfare. Ground units found GPS
extremely useful for finding their way through the featureless Gulf terrain,
so much so that the GPS Program Office had to make emergency buys of small,
lightweight GPS receivers. By the end of the war, GPS equipment was affixedsometimes
with tapeto the instrument panels of everything from Humvees to F-16s,
KC-135s, and B-52s.
For the first time, operational US commanders were using GPS and other space
systems in their daily decision-making. That led to a new appreciation of space
as a factor integral to USAF operations, according to Air Force Space Command
officials.
Almost Indispensable
A few years later, the air war over Kosovo showed many that GPS was much more
than an electronic direction finder. In the Gulf, generally clear weather and
open spaces had been an optimal environment for laser-guided weapons. In the
cloudy, rainy Balkans, lasers were often blocked, and GPSguided munitions
came into their own.
It got to the point where they [GPSguided weapons] were almost
indispensable, said Gen. Lester L. Lyles, now commander of Air Force Materiel
Command, not long after the war. Everything that a warfighter, or CINC,
or war planner is trying to do relative to attacking targets has become more
and more dependent on precision-guided weapons. We saw the beginning of this
during Desert Storm and saw it in spades over Kosovo.
Civilian use of GPS developed in a pattern similar to that of military use.
Application after application was added as more and more people understood what
it could do.
The first US government dictum about GPS civilian use came in response to an
enormitythe 1983 downing of Korean Air Lines Flight 007 by Soviet fighters
after it inadvertently strayed into Soviet airspace. In response, President
Reagan announced that the new Global Positioning System upon its completion
would be made available for international civilian users. In 1987 the Department
of Transportation set up its office for responding to civil GPS users and working
with the Defense Department on GPS policy.
The first GPS civilian market, however, was not airlines but surveyors. Their
need for accuracy made GPS invaluable, and surveyors demand for receivers
led to R&D and production efficiencies that lowered prices and opened up
further markets.
Today, handheld GPS equipment guides hikers through the wilderness. Panel-mounted
receivers guide luxury cars down streets unfamiliar to their owners. Geologists
use GPS data to measure minute movements in the Earths crust, with an
eye to better understanding of the location of earthquake zones. Even farmers
use GPS to help them grade their land to precise slopes and apply fertilizers
and seed in patterns designed to maximize yields.
Of course, ships and airliners use GPS, too, to the point where President Clinton
felt it necessary to reaffirm the US commitment to provide the signals to the
international community, free of direct-user fees, in a letter to the International
Civil Aviation Organization in 1995.
In the war on terrorism, GPS has been woven into operational concepts in ever
more complex ways. Secure in the systems accuracy, airmen have dropped
ordnance on enemy units within 75 feet of friendly positions. GPS positioning
data from Predator Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, integrated with real-time video,
have been data linked directly to strike aircraft, enabling them to hit targets
of opportunity within minutes.
Even Greater Accuracy
Over the years, there have been advances in the systems capability. Since
1997 the system has been upgraded with Block IIR satellites, which officials
say opened a new era in GPS performance.
Even after five years in orbit, the Block IIR models are maintaining a signal-in-space
accuracy of better than 3.3 feet, according to US officials.
Current plans call for upgraded Block IIF satellites to be placed in orbit
beginning in 2005. Per Presidential order, Block IIF will add a third civil
frequency for all users. The GPS joint program office ordered its first batch
of long-lead parts for Block IIF last March; maker Boeing has a contract for
six satellites, with a US option for six more.
Funds for a next-generation GPS III are in current budgets. Scheduled to be
launched around 2012, GPS III would feature further improvements in signal power
sufficient, perhaps, to dampen the concern among some service users that GPS
use for guided munitions could be thwarted by an adversary jamming the signal.
The military has made noises about civilian entities chipping in to share GPS
cost. After all, 90 percent of users are outside the armed forces.
But whoever pays for it, GPS is likely to become only more important to US
commanders in the years ahead.
In spite of the fact that we are using the word precision now, I think we are going to become even more precise as we get more and more refined capabilities, said Lyles. GPS has been very helpful, but we are going to try to find ways to make that precision even tighter to accomplish the job.