At
the height of the Cold War, when the threat from the
Soviet Union's long-range bombers posed a major strategic
threat, Aerospace Defense Command maintained 1,500
interceptor aircraft at more than 100 air defense "alert
sites" around the nation. Fighters stood cocked
and ready, 24 hours a day, to scramble and repel an
attack.
The air defense mission faded, though, and Aerospace
Defense Command was inactivated in 1980.
By Sept. 11, that defensive line had dwindled to seven
Air National Guard alert sites. The minutes before
the terrorists flew the hijacked airliners into the
World Trade Center and Pentagon saw North American
Aerospace Defense Command frantically scramble Air
National Guard interceptors, but to no avail. The closest
alert sites were in Massachusetts and southern Virginia,
far from the action in New York and Washington, D.C.
These ANG aircraft could not reach the hijackers in
time to stop them.
Much has changed since then. Homeland defense and
the role played by the National Guard and Reserve have
become subjects of utmost military gravity and emphasis.
Few doubt that major additional duties are in store
for the nation's on-call troops. DOD officials and
analysts say Sept. 11 marks another milestone in the
revolution that was already shifting much of the burden
of US defense onto the shoulders of citizen airmen
and soldiers.
In many ways, it's a new world for the nation's reserve
components.
"The 11th of September ... has caused every aircrew
member and every person in uniform to think about the
challenges that we never, never thought we'd ever face," said
Maj. Gen. Paul A. Weaver Jr., the recently retired
officer who was ANG director on the day of the attacks. "Americans
do not shoot down airliners with innocent women, children,
and men onboard, and this was new to us. ... We never
thought we would even be there. ... Our thinking was
always looking inward out, looking at the [Soviet]
Bear [bombers] coming down the northeast corridor or
drug runners coming in from the Gulf. Never did we
think that the threat would be from within."
Natural Fit
For many reasons, the Guard and Reserve of all armed
services fit naturally into the homeland defense mission.
Even before Sept. 11, a Reserve Component Employment
2005 study, conducted under the auspices of the Office
of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, and the
Office of Reserve Affairs, made that point explicitly,
suggesting reserve forces as the military units of
first resort in terms of homeland defense.
As state militia, National Guard forces already work
closely with governors in preparing for civil emergencies,
and Guard leaders are firmly rooted in state political
systems. While under state authority, Guard forces
are also not restrained (as are active duty forces)
by the posse comitatus law forbidding the military
from performing domestic law enforcement functions.
Reserve forces are also scattered in communities throughout
the United States, making them readily accessible for
emergency response operations.
Since1998, the National Guard has been standing up
specialized military teams to respond to catastrophic
terrorist attacks. The Pentagon announced in November
that there will be 32 of these units--called Weapons
of Mass Destruction--Civil Support Teams--to respond
to domestic terrorist attacks that involve such weapons.
They will be stationed in 31 states, with California
getting two teams.
Weaver
maintains that, as policy-makers and lawmakers in Washington
think through the implications of tasking the military
for homeland defense, the inherent advantages of the
National Guard and Reserve will become even more evident.
As future discussions on homeland defense unfold,
state governors and the National Guard will take a
leading role, said Weaver. Just from what's been done
since Sept. 11, he stated, from providing airport security
to flying air defense over an expanded area of the
United States, the National Guard will become a very
big part of the future homeland defense force.
Indeed, the heavy reliance on the Guard and Reserve
in response to the Sept. 11 attack suggests a pivotal
role for the nation's reserve forces both in homeland
defense and the overseas war on terrorism. Just three
days after the attacks in New York and Washington,
for instance, President Bush authorized the Pentagon
to mobilize up to 50,000 reserve members from the Air
Force, Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard. It
soon became clear that the military would exceed that
number and need even more.
The partial mobilization order signed by Bush also
authorizes the call-up of as many as one million reservists
for up to two years, if necessary. Such a partial mobilization
offers service leaders greater flexibility to call
up retirees as needed for various missions.
Message Delivered
Guard and Reserve officials say the rapid reservist
call-up in the immediate wake of the September attacks
also sent a strong message of US intent and purpose.
"When [the President calls] the National Guard
up, [he's] calling America up," said Weaver. "We're
key parts of the community, whether we are firemen
or policemen or bankers or lawyers or commercial airline
pilots." And he noted that because the Guard is
there in the communities, when it's called up it sends
a "magic" message to the nation and all of
its citizens, because they associate themselves directly
with Guardsmen.
With nearly 30,000 Air National Guard and Air Force
Reserve Command members called up by late November,
USAF was setting the pace among the armed forces. More
than 16,000 Army National Guard and Army Reserve soldiers
had also been called up.
Given numerous terrorist alerts at home and new requests
for additional security at federal installations pouring
in daily, Pentagon officials confirmed that they had
already exceeded the original call-up of 50,000 reservists.
Most of the Guardsmen and many Reservists have reported
for duty on the home front.
Already, uniformed Guardsmen and Reservists have become
a highly visible presence on America's post-Sept. 11
landscape. NORAD, for instance, has rapidly increased
the number of "strip alert" bases within
the US, expanding the network from seven to 26 sites.
The Air National Guard has provided virtually all of
the F-15 and F-16 fighters flying Combat Air Patrol
over major US urban areas as part of Operation Noble
Eagle.
More than 6,000 National Guardsmen have also deployed
to some 420 airports around the nation to provide extra
security and calm the fears of the traveling public.
Bush Administration officials announced Sept. 27 that
the federal government would cover the estimated six-month
cost of $150 million for posting the National Guard
troops at airport security checkpoints. More recently,
federal officials broadened the duties of Guard troops
deployed at airports to include patrolling airport
perimeters and parking areas.
For their part, Reserve forces have replaced many
active duty troops at Stateside bases, performing in
security roles, as firemen, air traffic controllers,
logisticians, and in other jobs. They have also augmented
the Dover AFB, Del., mortuary crews. AFRC port mortuary
specialists were among the first volunteers after the
September attacks.
AFRC
tanker aircrews and maintainers are also supporting
the Operation Noble Eagle CAPs with air refueling.
Other Reservists have been participating in Operation
Enduring Freedom, some as early volunteers who helped
establish the initial mobility air bridge to move personnel
and equipment overseas.
Defending Infrastructure
National Guard forces have also taken the lead in
securing other critical infrastructure. For example,
National Guardsmen in Massachusetts took command of
providing perimeter security at the Pilgrim nuclear
power plant in Plymouth. Guardsmen in Washington, D.C.,
have recently augmented the overworked Capitol Hill
police force, to help protect the United States Capitol
and House and Senate office buildings.
In Washington state's Puget Sound, some of the nearly
3,000 Coast Guard Reservists called to active duty
routinely patrol the area's harbors and waterways,
guarding against the terrorist threat. In California,
Gov. Gray Davis dispatched Guardsmen to patrol four
of the state's big suspension bridges--structures that
he thought were in peril of terrorist attack.
National Guard and Reserve forces assigned to homeland
defense missions will work directly at times with active
units, according to Gen. William F. Kernan, commander
in chief of US Joint Forces Command. That command has
responsibility for most US-based military forces. It
was recently given defense of the nation's territory
and coasts as an additional mission.
Officials at the federal level and the governors of
the states are looking very closely at critical infrastructure
with an eye to identifying what security enhancements
might be needed, said Kernan.
Rumsfeld recently designated Joint Forces Command
as the command responsible for supplying military assistance
to homeland defense missions. Kernan has established
a 90-man Homeland Defense Directorate to coordinate
operations.
Kernan said that national critical infrastructure
includes transportation hubs--airports, seaports, rail
terminals, etc.--that are located in states. For those
transportation nodes that are critical to the nation
and beyond the power of a governor to protect, "we
would make an assessment as to how best to protect
them" whether with additional National Guard troops
or with other assets.
In that sense, he said, after the 11 million first
responders in the nation's police and fire departments
and rescue services, the next line of defense is the
National Guard. "Those are the people who routinely
work with the state [and who] have developed emergency
preparedness plans that they are ready to execute."
ANG officials emphasize that their forces, while they
have taken the lead in many Noble Eagle homeland defense
missions, are also integrally involved in Enduring
Freedom in Afghanistan and Central Asia. In the total
Air Force, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve
Command forces account for 64 percent of the tactical
airlift, 55 percent of aerial refueling and strategic
tankers, 38 percent of tactical air support, and 27
percent of strategic airlift and refueling.
Many members of AFRC's 919th Special Operations Wing
based at Duke Field, Fla., were also activated in the
early days of the call-up. The 919th includes the 711th
Special Operations Squadron, which flies the MC-130E
Combat Talon for clandestine insertion of special operations
forces. The unit also includes the 5th Special Operations
Squadron, which flies the MC-130P Combat Shadow, for
special operations aerial refueling.
No Differentiation
"Everything the Air Force is doing, we are doing," Weaver
said. "Literally, the Air Force can't go to war
without the Air National Guard and the Air Force Reserve."

Whether
talking airlift, tanker support, ground support, or
combat operations, he emphasized, all of them are being
performed by active duty units, Air Guardsmen, and
Air Reservists. That's in keeping with the Total Force
philosophy, which doesn't differentiate missions as
being for the active duty, Guard, or Reserve. "It
is truly a Total Force mission."
Especially as the US military has evolved into a more
expeditionary force over the past decade, that close
integration with the active force has taken a toll
in terms of operations tempo for the Guard and Reserve.
Even before Sept. 11, many experts were concerned that
reserve forces were being pushed to the limit by a
continuous stream of peacekeeping and smaller-scale
contingency operations in places such as Iraq, Somalia,
Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo.
In recent years, for instance, reserve forces have
contributed 13 million duty days annually to ongoing
operations, a 13-fold increase over the 1980s level
of roughly one million duty days each year.
The Air Force took a major step in adapting to those
demands in late 1999 when it began organizing itself
into 10 Aerospace Expeditionary Forces, following signs
of serious personnel strains as a result of closely
spaced deployments. Reserve forces now account for
roughly 10 percent of personnel involved in each 15-month
AEF cycle, serving alongside active duty counterparts
in virtually all ongoing Air Force operations.
A few years back, said Weaver, the optempo of the
active duty Air Force was so high that people were "leaving
in droves," and there were major problems with
retention and recruiting. That forced the Air Force
to turn to the Air Guard and Reserve for help, and
in turn that became "a forcing mechanism" for
the Air Force to properly outfit the reserves with
modern equipment.
The result, said Weaver, is that the Air Guard now
runs about 25,000 Air Guardsmen through each 15-month-long
AEF cycle, which means that, in any 30-month period,
roughly half of the 108,000 men and women in the Air
National Guard are involved in real-world operations.
That's a much greater percentage than the Guard initially
anticipated, but "it has been a pleasure and a
joy to watch all of this happening."
By integrating themselves so closely into ongoing
operations, the Guard and Reserve have been largely
transformed. In the four decades of the Cold War, for
instance, reserve forces encountered few call-ups.
Since then, reserve forces have participated in Desert
Storm in 1991, Deliberate Force in 1995, Allied Force
in 1999, the decade-long no-fly zone enforcement operations
over Iraq, and Operations Enduring Freedom and Noble
Eagle.
Saturation Point?
Though they are proud to be involved in front-line
operations, many leaders of the Guard and Reserve have
become increasingly wary of reaching the saturation
point in terms of contributing to ongoing operations,
with the subsequent separations for reservists from
their families and civilian jobs. Efforts to shoulder
a large portion of the homeland defense burden will
add to those concerns.
A number of recent news reports, for instance, have
documented the hardships involved in the reserve call-up
for Noble Eagle and Enduring Freedom. Because so many
of the initial National Guard units activated were
military police, for instance, a number of local police
departments complained that their ranks were being
depleted at a time when their forces were stretched
thin in responding to terrorist alerts.
The financial hardships of reservists called to active
duty have also figured heavily in recent accounts.
Many reservists take large drops in pay when activated.
Current
law requires only an unpaid leave of absence for those
called to active duty, though Guardsmen and Reservists
must be reinstated with the same status, seniority,
and retirement benefits upon their return. According
to a recent survey, only seven percent of 200 companies
surveyed had an existing policy of paying employees
the difference between their regular and military pay.
To fully gauge the impact of increased deployments
on employers, the Office of Reserve Affairs sent out
its first-ever survey in 1999. The study revealed that
most employers supported the reserve service of their
employees, but many complained that reserve call-ups
were too long and unpredictable. Employers also complained
that reservists signed on to successive deployments
voluntarily and their jobs were nonetheless protected
by federal law.
Guard and Reserve officials say that adding flexibility
to operations is the key to maximizing the contribution
of reserve forces. For instance, instead of assigning
one reservist to a job, as might be done with an active
duty service member, officials have found it better
to have two or more reservists doing that job in rotation,
keeping time away from home limited for any one individual.
Air Guard and Air Force Reserve Command units have
also started sharing forward deployed aircraft in some
cases to help enable the reservists to deploy for shorter
intervals.
ANG fighters are among the oldest in the Air Force
fleet, averaging 20 years of service. Weaver, however,
expresses a relatively upbeat view of wear and tear
on Guard equipment. He told reporters on Nov. 5 that
ANG aircraft flying round-the-clock CAP missions are
in good shape and will be able to conduct such operations
indefinitely. "We've modernized the aircraft extensively
in the last four years," he said. "Maintenance
is one of our core competencies. We are flying a lot
more than anticipated, but our aircraft are in great
shape."
This robust rate of equipment modernization, coupled
with good retention and recruiting in recent years,
has left the Air Guard prepared to absorb the extra
workload of Enduring Freedom and Noble Eagle, according
to Weaver. In the aftermath of Sept. 11, many reservists
have reported to duty determined to lend a hand.
"Looking at where we are today, we are busier
in the Air National Guard than we've ever been in our
history, [yet] our retention has never been better," said
Weaver. In fact, he added, "the units that are
busiest normally have the highest retention rates as
well."
James Kitfield is the defense correspondent for National
Journal in Washington, D.C. His most recent article for
Air Force Magazine,
"The
Dangerous World of 2015," appeared in March
2001.