As USAF's top uniformed
health care officer, Lt. Gen. Charles H. Roadman II,
the Air Force surgeon general, has lots to worry about.
The job-related item that concerns him the most, he
explained, is not directly related to Tricare medical
program payments, contracts, or procedures. It is polarization-the
gulf of mistrust that now has opened between his office
and dissatisfied Tricare patients.
It's a split that was symbolized for him by a recent
letter from a retired colonel, who held that "having
a bad system that's improving doesn't make it a good
system."
That's not an assumption with which Roadman agrees.
He sees Tricare, for all its implementation problems,
as a sound military health care system that will be
the shape of military medicine for years to come.
"All of my working life, I have worn a uniform," said
the general in an interview in his office at Bolling
AFB, D.C. "The military and its retirees are the
people I feel responsible for. And so, as we see rancor
and angst, that just bothers me down to my core."
The surgeon general points out that the entire nation
is moving toward managed care to head off health costs
that could otherwise hit $2.1 trillion by 2007. If
anything, Tricare is a model for, and reflection of,
the health care networks that now cover more and more
American civilians.
Switching military medicine to managed care has turned
out to be a huge and complex undertaking. The task
has not been easy, Roadman acknowledged, but he urges
everyone to put the problems in context. Kaiser Permanente
has been honing managed care in the civilian world
for 50 years, he noted. Tricare has been transforming
the military for five.
"Good" and "Valid" Concept
"The fact of the matter is we began with a good
concept," said Roadman. "The concept is still
valid. We have lots of things that we've got to do."
A number of things have already been done. Roadman
said that some of the Tricare issues raised by the
Air Force Association and other groups have now been
rectified.
One such issue concerns portability. In the past,
some Tricare beneficiaries have complained of difficulties
switching from one region to another. The system was
not seamless: Moving from a region administered by
one contractor to one run by another required starting
paperwork all over again.
Contract changes mean that is no longer the case,
said Roadman.
"In fact [Tricare enrollment] is now portable," he
said. "You no longer have to disenroll and re-enroll."
The related problem of split enrollment has also been
solved, according to the Air Force's top uniformed
doctor. Having immediate family in another Tricare
region--for example, a child attending college away
from home--is supposed to no longer result in the need
for them to re-enroll.
Similarly, AFA's position against multiple co-payments
by Tricare enrollees has been adopted by DoD.
"We listen to the associations, as we listen
to the patients," said Roadman. "Unfortunately,
we can't turn it on a dime, because there are large
contractual federal acquisition regulations [involved]."
The issue of CHAMPUS Maximum Allowable Charges (CMACs)
illustrates how complex and interwoven perceived Tricare
problems can become.
Some critics complain that CMACs, the reimbursement
rates to health care providers for providing specific
medical procedures or units of care, have been too
low. The federal government's huge Medicare program
pays more, say critics, and low CMAC rates are a big
reason why private doctors do not accept Tricare patients
or drop out of the system.
In fact, out of about 6,000 different procedure codes,
only about 70 were different from Medicare, said Roadman.
Some of those codes were in pediatrics, an area of
medicine that Medicare does not have. And there was
a regional difference in CMAC rates because from county
to county there are different reimbursement rates even
under Medicare.
All CMAC rates are now equal to or greater than their
Medicare equivalents, said Roadman.
In some areas of the country, managed care contractors
have negotiated fees with providers that are lower
than the Medicare rate. These negotiated fees vary
based on the market and willingness of health groups
to discount their fees.
"The fact of the matter is, all these things
are tools of managed care to begin to control the cost," said
Roadman.
Tricare has been effective at controlling costs, particularly
in areas where it has large numbers of enrollees in
the HMO-like Tricare Prime option, said Roadman. He
points to a recent Center for Naval Analyses study
which came to just such a conclusion.
It Saves You Money
"Tricare Prime has not only decreased the cost
for the government, but it has decreased the cost for
people--out-of-pocket cost. It has improved the access
and increased the quality," said Roadman, citing
CNA's conclusions.
Critics have charged that Tricare has immense turnover
in providers in its systems due to CMAC rates and late
payments. Roadman said that, judging from the statistics,
that is not strictly the case.
The average turnover in a civilian health care network
is about 5 percent a year, he said. In the 12 Tricare
regions, turnover runs from 3.5 to 6 percent.
When providers pull out of Tricare, it makes headlines
and gives beneficiaries the feeling that their health
care options are evaporating. The fact that such developments
cause inconvenience to patients distresses him, said
Roadman.
"Do we have turnover?" he said. "More
than I want. Have we had turnover that I am distraught
about? Absolutely not."
All this does not mean that real problems do not remain.
Claims processing has been quite a challenge for the
Tricare system, said Roadman. Problems with claims
are one of the top complaints of system beneficiaries.
In addition, the cost of Tricare claims crunching remains
high-about fives times as much, per claim, as that
of Medicare.
The difference between Tricare and Medicare is that
Tricare claims processing has military specifications,
to use a weapons procurement analogy.
"What you're trading off is complexity for decreased
fraud," said Roadman.
The Tricare claims form is too complicated and will
be simplified over the next year. But it is unlikely
to become as simple as Medicare because it needs to
retain some fraud protection.
The standard for Tricare claims processing is 75 percent
clearance within 21 days. The system is doing well
against this measure, said Roadman. TriWest Healthcare
Alliance, for instance, has over 90 percent clearance
within 21 days.
Given the number of claims involved, however, the
10 or 20 percent of claims that do not make the standard
represent hundreds of upset patients and thousands
of extra phone calls, said Roadman.
Claims Submissions at Fault
Often, said the surgeon general, Tricare officials
discover that a delay in claims processing is related
to the quality of the claim submitted. If a form is
incomplete or contains a wrong ID number or other problem,
it can take a long time to settle.
"Now, as the claims process is simplified, what's
going to happen is, by policy, we're no longer going
to accept non-clean claims," said Roadman. "What
that means is there will be a reject rate that will
probably go up, but those that are in fact clean will
be paid much quicker."
Such a change will occur as more and more providers
accept electronic billing, as opposed to paper forms
mailed in.
That will be the 21st century way to handle claims
processing, according to the surgeon general. However,
moving in that direction is not entirely under Tricare's
control. It will be part and parcel of national health
care reforms.
In the end, said Roadman, he would never say he is
aiming low when it comes to claims processing, but
he's realistic. "I don't think we will ever get
down to the Medicare cost [per claim] and as simple
a form as Medicare."
Another of the main complaints of Tricare beneficiaries:
poor access to health care. DoD does need to improve
access, say military health officials. However, they
claim that the record in this area is better than many
Tricare participants may realize.
With the number of Military Treatment Facilities down
about 35 percent since the late 1980s, there are fewer
beds and waiting rooms for patients to squeeze into,
pointed out Roadman.
However, a recent General Accounting Office audit
found that Tricare met its standard for urgent care
within 24 hours about 85 percent of the time. The standard
for routine care within seven days was met about 95
percent of the time, according to the GAO.
"Does that mean we're where we need to be?" Roadman
asked rhetorically. "Nope, it doesn't. Clearly,
I want to meet the standard every time."
Military Treatment Facilities do not meet access standards
as well as private facilities that are part of Tricare,
according to Roadman. This is because Tricare Prime
patients compete with space-available retiree care
and other priorities in MTFs. Military facilities also
need to improve their efficiency, he said, by increasing
support staff so that doctors can focus on providing
medical care.
The goal is to have a ratio of 3.5 support staff for
each Primary Care Manager. That will break down into
one nurse, two administrators, and four medical technicians
for every two PCMs.
Right now the ratio is more like one support staffer
for each doctor.
"That's a real problem for us-the amount of administration
that's being done by a lot of our providers," said
Roadman. "It decreases their efficiency. It decreases
the access."
Still, while Tricare has room for improvement in the
area of access, it is comparable to the civilian health
system record, in the view of Roadman.
As Good as It Gets
"If you think you get better access than that
in the civil sector, you need to get on the phone again
and check the color of the grass on the outside," said
Roadman.
Similarly, preauthorization is a problem for Tricare,
but not unduly so, according to the surgeon general.
Preauthorization requirements can be contractual.
In Tricare Region 1, for instance, once a patient receives
a specialist referral from a PCM, there is a standard
three-day cycle before the referral is authorized.
According to Tricare officials, such waits exist not
to delay action, per se, but to ensure the medical
necessity of the referral and to make sure the PCM
is included in the decision.
The purpose of such routines "is to build a bottleneck
so that you can get control of continuity of care,
cost of health care, and to ensure that the doctor
that takes care of you knows what's going on with you," said
Roadman.
Flight Medicine for All
The role of the PCM is a crucial one. As a flight
surgeon, Roadman found nothing more frustrating than
to have patients complain that they were not getting
better and then find out that they were being seen
by eight different providers, each without knowledge
of the other, who were all prescribing different treatments.
The Tricare goal is for each PCM to be responsible
for no more than 1,500 patients.
Continuity of care will enable prevention-oriented
treatments to really pay off. "What I'm describing
is flight medicine--flight medicine for everybody is
the model I would use," said Roadman.
The surgeon general worries quite a bit about the
situation of personnel at geographically separated
units--recruiters, ROTC instructors, and others who
are assigned to areas where there are no MTFs and no
Tricare Prime system. Such personnel inevitably incur
increased health care costs.
One of the things the Air Force is trying to do to
help is to establish a central office to manage their
claims. That will not be up and running, for those
on active duty, until this October. It will be another
year beyond that before it can handle claims from the
families of active duty members.
"It's not nearly at the rate it should happen," said
Roadman. "It's a recognized problem [and] we ought
to be able to solve it quicker."
Funding is an area where military health officials
have continued worries. Right now, the budget looks
good through 2001. A Defense Department and Air Force
infusion of $194 million helped put USAF's health programs
back up above the "executable" line for its
programs.
But increased workload means increased costs. And
workload is unpredictable. The reserve call-up for
the Kosovo crisis shows how fast things can change.
"We are mobilizing people to take care of our
warfighters in Europe," said Roadman.
Some of the growing pains that Tricare has experienced
should be seen against the context of the national
struggle over health care policy, according to the
Air Force surgeon general.
Through the Flak Trap?
The United States does not have universal access to
health care. Tricare is struggling to hold down costs
while providing high-quality care to its enrollees
and figuring out how to care for military retirees--who,
by the way, were promised free medicine for life. This
is a microcosm of what's going on in the civilian world,
said Roadman, though "it's against a much larger
backdrop."
The Air Force surgeon general said he does not want
to be drawn into a debate about critics' perceptions
of the Tricare system. Such arguments are "steam
that doesn't get to the turbine," in his phrase. "I
would want us to be seen as working people's problems
to solve what it is they need," said Roadman. "That's
the bottom line."
He said that managed care has been vilified virtually
everywhere, from newspaper articles to popular movies.
There is still resistance to the concept from payers,
patients, and providers, according to Roadman. However,
he claimed, it's the only game in town. It is where
the Air Force is headed.
He said, "I think we're about 90 percent through
the flak trap. The idea of turning around and flying
through the 90 percent of the flak trap going back
is not appealing. It is time to throttle forward and
fly through the rest of the 10 percent."