The Landlord Speaks
"Irresponsible Internationalism"
American lives should not be risked-and lost-in places like
Somalia, Haiti, and Rwanda with marginal or no American interests
at stake. Such actions make it more difficult to convince American
mothers and fathers to send their sons and daughters to battle
when vital interests are at stake. The American people will not
tolerate American casualties for irresponsible internationalism.
Sen. Robert Dole (R-Kan.), Senate Majority Leader and candidate
for the 1996 Republican presidential nomination, writing in the
spring 1995 issue of the journal Foreign Policy.
Iran's Threat to the Gulf
This [Iranian force deployment] involves almost 8,000 military
personnel moved to those islands. It involves antiship missiles,
air defense missiles, chemical weapons. It can only be regarded
as a potential threat to shipping in the [Persian Gulf] area.
Secretary of Defense William J. Perry, in a March 22, 1995,
press conference in Bahrain concerning the recent buildup of
Iranian military forces and equipment on several Persian Gulf
islands.
Global "Presence" From Afar
[T]he Air Force has reconceptualized "presence."
. . . Our concept of presence includes all peacetime applications
of military capability that promote US influence, regardless
of service. Correspondingly, the way we exert presence is changing.
. . . Our space and airborne collection platforms help provide
global situational awareness. Sometimes this information by itself
can promote US influence. In other cases, information linked
to forces that can react swiftly with the right mix of joint
capabilities anywhere on the globe reduces the need for traditional
physical presence. Our bomber force, for instance, can deliver
incredible firepower anywhere on Earth in less than twenty hours.
. . . Of course, permanent presence is still imperative in many
areas, . . . but the United States doesn't need and cannot afford
to be everywhere at once.
Air Force Secretary Sheila E. Widnall and USAF Chief of
Staff Gen. Ronald R. Fogleman, in a March 2, 1995, statement
to the Senate Armed Services Committee. Emphasis in original.
Here's the Future
During World War II, the Eighth Air Force attacked something
like fifty target sets in all of 1943. In [Operation] Desert
Storm, the coalition struck 150 individual targets in the first
twenty-four hours. Not too far into the next century, we may
be able to engage 1,500 targets within the first hour, if not
the first minutes, of a conflict. Gone are the days of calculating
aircraft-per-target kinds of ratios. Now we think in terms of
targets-per-aircraft.
Gen. Ronald R. Fogleman, US Air Force Chief of Staff, in
a February 24, 1995, address to the Air Force Association's Air
Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Florida.
Quick, Somebody Call Oprah
The honeymoon [between post-Soviet Russia and the United
States] has come to an end. The sobering period has not ended
in divorce but rather in a growing ability to resolve jointly
[the] problems we face. Something we won't allow to happen is
unfaithfulness.
Russian Foreign Minister Andrei Kozyrev, in a March 23,
1995, news conference at the conclusion of two days of talks
in Geneva with Secretary of State Warren Christopher.
Now That's a Cutback
Over the past decade, the total obligational authority dedicated
to strategic nuclear forces has decreased by some seventy-five
percent, so that it now constitutes less than 3.5 percent of
the total defense budget. Since 1985, the number of people in
our strategic nuclear forces has declined approximately fifty
percent; the number of strategic bases has dropped sixty percent;
and the number of strategic nuclear weapons platforms-bombers,
ballistic missile submarines, and intercontinental ballistic
missile silos-has been reduced about forty-four percent. Many
strategic force programs have been terminated, curtailed, or
outright canceled, resulting . . . in a cost-avoidance savings
of approximately $100 billion.
Adm. Henry G. Chiles, Jr., commander in chief of US Strategic
Command, in February 23, 1995, testimony to the Senate Armed
Services Committee.
South of the Border
Real, immediate challenges to NATO Allies have been mounting
to the south [of Europe]. Flash points have emerged in the Mediterranean,
in southwest Asia, in the Balkans, and in North Africa. The potential
spread of instability across the Mediterranean would not only
threaten friendly regimes of North Africa and the prospects for
peace in the Middle East, it would also threaten Europe with
new social and security problems. Not, in the first instance,
"military" in the traditional sense, but nonetheless
immensely challenging because they would involve terrorism and
the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Attention to
these issues has to be high on the agenda of NATO.
Walter B. Slocombe, under secretary of defense for Policy,
in a March 2, 1995, address to the Center for Strategic and International
Studies in Washington, D.C.
And Congress Will Be a Big Help
That whole building [the Pentagon] needs to be reinvented.
Look at the procurement system. It takes you twenty-five years
to bring a C-17 from development to on-line [status]. I mean,
the whole procurement system is a disaster, and we are going
to have changes in that Pentagon.
Rep. John R. Kasich (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Budget
Committee, in March 19, 1995, remarks on NBC's "Meet the
Press."
Copyright by Air Force Association.
All rights reserved
|