In today's cynical world, the very act of remembering
a hero poses many problems. Invoking Billy Mitchell's
name raises questions of relevance, accuracy, and purpose.
Can a man who began his crusade for airpower nearly
eighty years ago, whose finest hour came seventy years
ago, and who died in relative obscurity sixty years
ago, have more than symbolic meaning for us today?
Is the symbol really accurate? Did Mitchell actually
predict the future? And, most fundamental, given the
passage of time and events and considering the technological,
economic, social, and political revolutions that have
transpired since his heyday, can anything Mitchell
did or said be useful for today's United States Air
Force?
The answer to all of these questions is a resounding "yes," for
he molded what would become the US Air Force in a thousand
ways that have been increasingly overlooked and need
to be remembered. Today, USAF is riding the fourth
section of a multistage rocket that Billy Mitchell
launched by the sheer force of his personality and
the breadth of his vision.
At the height of his fame, when he was tilting with
the War Department and the Navy Department with equal
enthusiasm, the term "Mitchellism" was coined
by the press to symbolize the concept that airpower
was now the dominant military factor and that sea and
land forces were becoming subordinate. In the intervening
years, the correctness of his thinking, the accuracy
of his predictions, the risks he took, the sacrifices
he so willingly made of his health and his career,
and, by far the most important, the influence he had
on his successors have conferred a new, higher, and
entirely contemporary meaning on "Mitchellism."
Billy Mitchell's name conjures up different and mostly
stereotyped images. For those with an interest in airpower,
it brings to mind the visionary who sank battleships
and paid the price for defying the War Department.
Unfortunately, for far too many, the name Billy Mitchell
is associated only with a grainy black-and-white movie
showing Gary Cooper fighting a court-martial.
Brig. Gen. William L. Mitchell deserves better than
this. So great was his impact on the Army Air Service
and its successor organizations that the effect is
still being felt. During Mitchell's meteoric military
career, he charted new paths, set new standards, and
influenced key leaders for decades to come. Mitchell
was twenty years ahead of his time when he put forth
his detailed vision of a hazardous future. More important,
he knew that airpower was the answer to overcoming
the danger. His impassioned campaign to tell his story
had a quadruple-barreled impact on the modern Air Force,
past, present, and future.
Mitchell and the Past
Billy Mitchell was born into privileged circumstances
in Nice, France, on December 29, 1879. His father,
John L. Mitchell, became a US senator and would quietly
smooth the way for his impetuous son's early military
career. Commissioned as a second lieutenant at age
eighteen, Billy Mitchell immediately got on the fast
track by demonstrating his leadership and organizational
skills in the Philippines and Alaska. Without a contracting
officer's warrant, he managed to spend $50,000 of US
government money to build a telegraph line across Alaska--on
an authorized budget of $5,000. The overrun must not
have hurt Mitchell; he came back a captain at age twenty-three,
the youngest in the Army.
At thirty-two, Mitchell became the youngest officer
ever appointed to the Army General Staff. While in
Washington, he felt the first attraction to aviation,
seeing in it the future for his country and, not incidentally,
for himself. Paying for his own flying lessons, he
learned to fly in four Sunday sessions at the Curtiss
Flying School, Newport News, Va., in 1915.
There have been disputes over his ability as a flyer-for
example, Maj. Gen. Benjamin D. Foulois always contended
that Mitchell was not a "regular" Army flyer
because he had not been through an Army flying school.
(This was a somewhat ironic point for Foulois to make,
given that he had taught himself to fly by corresponding
with the Wright brothers.) On the other hand, one of
the great pioneer test pilots, the record-setting Lt.
Lester J. Maitland, stated unequivocally that Mitchell "could
fly anything with wings and fly it well."
Mitchell's flying catapulted him to prominence, and
he became deputy chief of the Signal Corps Aviation
Section in 1916, with the rank of major. This was his
ticket to the top. He wangled his way to France as
a military observer in March 1917. When the US declared
war on Imperial Germany the next month, he soon established
himself as the premier US aviation officer in France.
He was promoted to lieutenant colonel in May and to
colonel in August 1917 and received a rating as a Junior
Military Aviator without the normal testing process.
Fluent in French, unlike most of his colleagues, Billy
Mitchell became what today would be called a master
networker-cementing ties, obtaining resources, making
friends, and pledging help that he could only hope
to deliver. Hugh "Boom" Trenchard, commander
of the Royal Flying Corps (later, first Marshal of
the Royal Air Force), became his mentor. He could not
have chosen better.
Mitchell drew many ideas from Trenchard, especially
the fundamental conclusion that airpower was primarily
an instrument for offensive, not defensive, employment.
Mitchell embraced Trenchard's concepts on supremacy
in the air and demonstrated them as chief of the Air
Service, 1st Brigade, and by the time of the Saint-Mihiel
offensive of September 1918 was chief of the Air Service,
1st Army, American Expeditionary Forces.
Mitchell commanded 1,476 aircraft and twenty balloons,
assembled from 101 American, British, French, and Italian
squadrons, in the greatest air offensive of the war.
The battle of Saint-Mihiel was itself a bit of an anticlimax,
as the Germans were in the process of evacuating the
salient, but the air battle went as Mitchell had planned.
Challenge to the Navy
In the convulsive downsizing that followed World War
I, Mitchell, who had achieved the grade of temporary
brigadier general (a grade he would retain for all
but ten months until April 1925), was one of the few
officers not reduced in rank, much to the distress
of longtime rival Foulois, who reverted to being a
major. Yet the War Department regarded Mitchell as
a loose cannon and placed him under the supervision
of a nonflyer, Maj. Gen. Charles T. Menoher, the new
Director of the Air Service.
It was at this point that Billy Mitchell set out on
the path that would lead him to his greatest heights--and
ultimately to his court-martial. Knowing he would never
prevail over the stolid, conservative Army leaders
of the time, Mitchell went public. He soon became a
national figure as a witness at Congressional hearings.
He expanded his audience with speeches and articles
on his new ideas about airpower. Already in hot water
with the Army, he next collided with the deep-water
Navy by saying that airplanes could sink battleships.
The Navy's leadership ignored, ridiculed, or attacked
Mitchell, depending on the issue, but he finally backed
them into a corner with an open challenge while testifying
before the House subcommittee on aviation. Mitchell
announced that "1,000 bombardment airplanes can
be built and operated for about the price of one battleship." He
declared that his airplanes could sink a battleship,
and he invited the economy-minded Congress to see for
itself. In his Congressional testimony, as in everything
Mitchell did, lay the subliminal message that there
should be an independent Air Force, equal with the
Army and the Navy.
The Navy grudgingly agreed to a demonstration, providing
as the targets some captured Imperial German Navy ships,
including a submarine, a destroyer, a cruiser, and
the toughest ship of all, the many-compartmented battleship
Ostfriesland-thought by many to be unsinkable. The
Navy also provided strict rules of engagement, designed
to minimize Mitchell's chance of success.
Mitchell created the First Provisional Air Brigade
at Langley Field, Va., equipping it with some 150 bombers
and pursuit airplanes and almost 1,000 personnel--a
considerable portion of the Air Service. The heavy
bombs he knew he needed were not available. With typical
foresight and tenacity, Mitchell induced the ordnance
division to produce 2,000-pound bombs, based on a sketch
he and two ordnance men drew during an afternoon's
conversation.
The tests off the Virginia Capes in the fall of 1921
were carefully regulated, with many observers stationed
nearby to make sure that the rules were followed. The
Navy set up some procedures to hamper Mitchell's efforts,
including limiting the size and number of bombs that
could be dropped on any single sortie.
At the crucial moment, when it appeared the Ostfriesland
might indeed be too tough a nut to crack, Mitchell
violated the rules by sending in his twin-engine Martin
bombers to drop six of the big bombs instead of the
three they were allowed. A hit and several near misses
split the seams of the tough old German battleship,
and she went down, to the horror of the assembled Navy
brass. To add insult to injury, the seventh ship of
Mitchell's formation, a Handley Page, dropped its 2,000
pounder into the foam and bubbles rising from the sunken
ship.
Mitchell was vindicated, but it was the Navy itself
that would benefit most from the tests, as they turned
immediately to embrace the concept of aircraft carriers,
which would dominate the naval war in the Pacific only
twenty years later. Oddly enough, Mitchell's greatest
contributions to the Air Service and its successor
organizations, contributions that echo today, were
made in a far less spectacular fashion.
Impact on R&D
Despite the postwar collapse of the Air Service budget,
Mitchell saw to it that the maximum possible funds
were given to McCook Field, Ohio, the ancestor not
only of Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, but also Edwards
AFB, Calif., Arnold Engineering Development Center,
Arnold AFB, Tenn., and every other base where research
and development work is done. Mitchell served as both
whip and inspiration to the engineers he assigned to
bring forth faster fighters and bigger bombers.
Mitchell knew that flying had to be sold to the public
before it could be sold to Congress and that record-setting
would advance aviation technology, even as it gained
public attention. He was wholeheartedly behind the
great headline-making flights of the era, from the
1923 nonstop transcontinental flight in the Fokker
T-2-Mitchell did not hesitate to buy from foreign sources
when it suited his needs--to the 175-day trip around
the world of the Douglas World Cruisers in 1924. On
October 18, 1922, in his first flight in the beautiful
little Curtiss R-6 biplane, Mitchell himself set a
world absolute speed record of 222.97 mph.
Appearances to the contrary, Mitchell could not be
everywhere and do everything even as he was leading
the fight for an independent Air Force. He deliberately
created a climate in the Air Service that was passed
on to its successor services, one in which technology
was recognized as the ore from which a war-winning
air force could be refined. Most important, he inspired
devotion in the airmen who would follow in his footsteps
and keep research and development at the top of the
priority list. His best choice, and a very loyal friend,
was a young officer named Henry H. Arnold.
Mitchell's own career had run its course by the mid-1920s.
Controversial testimony before Congressional committees,
combined with intemperate speeches and articles calling
for an independent Air Force, made him persona non
grata with both the Navy and War Departments. Demoted
to colonel and exiled to a minor post in San Antonio,
Tex., he continued to lash out. When the Navy dirigible
Shenandoah was torn apart in a severe squall over Byesville,
Ohio, Mitchell released a 6,000-word statement to the
press. The September 5, 1925, statement attacked the
War Department and the Navy Department for incompetence
and for seeking publicity at the cost of tolerating
dangerous flights. He also predicted his own court-martial.
The Morrow Board
In a preemptive move designed to moderate anything
Mitchell might say at his court-martial, President
Calvin Coolidge set up a board under Dwight W. Morrow "for
the purpose of making a study of the best means of
developing and applying aircraft in national defense." Mitchell's
testimony before the board was measured and brilliant,
laying out with clarity the specter of the Pacific
war that would come only sixteen years later. He predicted
the rise of Japanese strength and later foretold its
Sunday-morning attack on Pearl Harbor and the Philippines.
He made the argument, accurate until 1944, that aircraft
carriers could not operate against landbased aviation.
He saw war as global and imminent, and he knew that
airpower was the only way to master the situation.
And it was President Coolidge himself who ordered
Mitchell's court-martial under charges of insubordination
under the 96th Article of War ("conduct of a nature
to bring discredit on the military service").
The trial lasted seven weeks, most of which was devoted
to a discussion of Mitchell's concept of airpower.
The verdict of guilty was a foregone conclusion, and
Mitchell was sentenced to be suspended from rank, command,
and duty, with a forfeiture of all pay and allowances
for five years. President Coolidge, in an uncharacteristic
fit of generosity, later reduced this to forfeiture
of half his pay and allowances.
Billy Mitchell refused the offer and resigned on February
1, 1926. All through the court-martial proceedings,
Mitchell had the staunch support of "Hap" Arnold
and such officers as Carl Spaatz, Herbert Dargue, Robert
Olds, William Gillmore, Horace Hickam, and others.
Each put his career on the line for Mitchell even though
they knew he would be convicted. After the trial, Arnold
was exiled to become commanding officer of the 16th
Observation Squadron, Fort Riley, Kan. The assignment
was intended to be the end of his career.
Mitchell continued to campaign in speeches and articles. "Hap" Arnold,
for his part, soldiered on, his leadership qualities
inevitably propelling him to the top, regardless of
residual resentment about his unflagging support for
Mitchell.
More important than Arnold's loyalty, however, was
his comprehension of Mitchell's fascination with technology.
Early in his tour as Army Air Corps Chief, Arnold began
soliciting the ideas and the company of the top scientists
in the country.
Eventually, he enlisted the assistance of such stellar
names as Theodore von Kármán, Hugh L.
Dryden, Frank Wattendorf, Hsue-shen Tsien, Vladimir
K. Zworykin, and many others for the Scientific Advisory
Group, later transformed into the Scientific Advisory
Board. These men and others created first "Where
We Stand" and then "Toward New Horizons," studies
that addressed state-of-the-art technology and put
forth a blueprint for the development of the postwar
Air Force.
It is important to note that neither Mitchell nor
Arnold had the scientific competence to write such
reports; they had, instead, the far more vital ability
to see that the reports were needed, recognize who
could produce them, and sympathetically enlist their
support. The officers Arnold picked to work with the
scientists were equally well chosen, among them such
men as James H. Doolittle, Donald L. Putt, and Laurence
C. Craigie. They knew the importance of science and
of scientists.
Again in the spirit of Billy Mitchell, Arnold picked
promising young officers who understood the requirements
of technology and saw that they were given a track
to top positions. Doing so cost him friends. Comrades
who had served with him, and who were now passed over,
resented his choices. But Arnold knew he was not running
a popularity contest; he was building an independent
Air Force.
The constructive culture created by Mitchell and Arnold
made it possible for R&D positions to be established
for such men as Bernard A. Schriever and his successors.
From that foundation grew the intricate structure of
developments leading first to a fleet of ICBMs and
then to the exploitation of space technology. The subsequent
development of satellites that harvest intelligence
on an unprecedented scale can be attributed directly
to the encouraging climate given research and development
by Mitchell, Arnold, and their spiritual successors.
The Future Air Force
Mitchell and Arnold successfully established the service
that, as the Army Air Forces, would be vital in winning
World War II. It is less well understood that they
achieved this through an unprecedented appreciation
for technology and a willingness to gamble on the brains
of men they respected.
Neither Mitchell nor Arnold would have claimed to
have been scientists, and both would have admitted
readily that they did not understand the engineering
underlying the equipment the scientists promised to
deliver. However, both understood that the greatest
scientists in the world cannot contribute to national
defense unless they are invited to do so and are then
given an environment in which they can comfortably
function.
When von Kármán told Arnold that he
was not certain he could conform to the customs of
the Pentagon, Arnold quickly told him not to worry--he
would see that the Pentagon conformed to von Kármán.
That was Mitchellism at its finest!
Walter J. Boyne, formerly director of the National
Air and Space Museum in Washington, D. C., is a retired
Air Force colonel and author. He has written more
than 400 articles and several books, the most recent
of which was Silver Wings. His last article for Air
Force Magazine, "Weird, Wonderful Warplanes," appeared
in the June 1975 issue.