The article in the April 13, 1974, New Republic was
exceptionally negative. The mission of this latest
USAF aircraft, it suggested, was phony, a mere pretext
to keep tax dollars flowing to defense contractors.
The system cost too much. Tests cast doubt on whether
it would actually work. It was an obvious pouch of
flab in a bloated defense budget.
The mocking title said it all: "AWACS: The Plane
That Would Not Die."
At least the title was accurate. The E-3 Airborne
Warning and Control System certainly would not die-and
for good reasons. Far from turning out to be an expensive
boondoggle, the 707 with the huge rotating radar dome
("a mushroom with elephantiasis," sneered
TNR) has become a bedrock of US military power.
Twenty-five years ago, on March 24, 1977, Boeing delivered
the first basic production version of the E-3 Sentry
to Air Force officials at Tinker AFB, Okla. The ensuing
quarter century has shown the AWACS to be indispensable,
often the first system to go into action when a threat
arises and the last to leave once operations cease.
The AWACS has turned out to be even more important
than envisioned by its Air Force proponents. It was
the first of a new class of systems that would give
US forces a revolutionary edge in military capability.
AWACS transcended its Cold War origin to help dominate
the air wars over Iraq, Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan,
plus numerous other armed actions.
"I don't think any of us knew, as the world changed
and missions evolved, that it would have such a continuing
important role in multiple contingencies," said
Col. Brian M. Waechter, AWACS system program director
at Air Force Materiel Command's Electronic Systems
Center, Hanscom AFB, Mass.
The All-Seeing Eye
The E-3 has become the "eyes" and battle
manager for virtually all Air Force combat operations.
Its actual value can be measured in flying hours. The
venerable B-52 bomber and KC-135 tanker are both nearly
twice the age of the AWACS, in calendar years. Yet
today's B-52 and KC-135 airframes have logged fewer
flight hours, on average, than AWACS airframes.
"This platform has been heavily used since its
inception," said Waechter.
The impetus to build a system such as AWACS came from
the manner in which air forces learned to deal with
electronic waves of radar in the years following World
War II. Radar had been a revolutionary weapon in the
struggle against Nazi Germany. Its ability to spot
everything from an approaching bomber to the conning
tower of a U-boat gave the Allies an edge in some of
the most crucial battles of the war.
Yet one feature of radar is vulnerable to exploitation
by opponents. Its beams travel only in straight lines.
Thus aircraft that hug the ground can take advantage
of the curvature of the Earth and penetrate close to
ground transmitters before popping up to attack.
Fast forward to the 1960s. The miniaturization of
electronics had reached a point at which Air Force
officials came to believe that a single airframe could
now transport a powerful search radar plus computers
able to handle the difficult task of differentiating
moving aircraft and ground clutter. The aircraft would
also contain communication equipment sophisticated
enough to give commanders a real-time view of the battlespace.

An artist's early concept drawing shows the saucer-shaped rotodome
mounted on a forward-swept tail instead of on the fuselage, behind
the wings.
On Dec. 22, 1965, Air Force Systems Command set up
an Airborne Warning and Control System Program Office,
and the AWACS effort officially was born.
From the start, the Pentagon treated development of
the system as a high-priority effort. For example,
AWACS had its own streamlined procurement rules, and
its management came under the direct supervision of
the Secretary of Defense.
The first question to settle was what airframe to
select. There was a battle between the McDonnell Douglas
DC-8, Lockheed EC-121, and Boeing 707. In July 1970,
after a tough flyoff, Boeing won the prize.
The first test airframe flew in February 1972. After
some 500 hours of radar test flights, Boeing selected
the Westinghouse radar system over competing equipment
manufactured by Hughes.
On Jan. 26, 1973, USAF announced it had given approval
to Boeing to proceed with full-scale development of
AWACS aircraft.
In these early years the main mission of AWACS, as
defined in official military requirement documents,
was to provide aid in the air defense of North America.
It was to be a sort of early warning radar in the sky,
alerting North American Aerospace Defense Command to
the approach of Soviet bombers if and when they ever
flew over northern latitudes toward US and Canadian
territory.
Nixon's Second Look
By the early 1970s, however, the fast-flying Soviet
intercontinental ballistic missile equipped with multiple
nuclear warheads had surpassed Russia's manned bomber
as the most dangerous strategic threat. Defense against
a bomber strike was still important, but the Nixon
Administration in 1973 decided to take another look
at the AWACS program and assess its continued relevance.
This second look at AWACS produced yet another mission
for the system. Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger
decided that AWACS needed to be enhanced so it could
serve not only as a strategic early warning aircraft
but also as an airborne command-and-control center
for tactical air operations, particularly in Western
Europe.
This was not a particularly difficult technical change,
recalled retired Gen. Lawrence A. Skantze, who was
deputy for the E-3A program at Hanscom in the key 197377
period. It meant changing the way in which some data
were monitored and adding a few internal consoles.
It increased the cost somewhat.
From a political point of view, however, the addition
of a new mission generated many problems.

The lookdown radar inside the signature rotodome provides a 360-degree
view. The dome itself rotates, is 30 feet wide and six feet thick,
and sits on two struts that support the radar 14 feet above the
fuselage.
"It created a lot of turmoil," said Skantze. "Some
of the program's opponents in Congress declared that
we really didn't have a mission."
The AWACS program encountered strong opposition in
the powerful House Armed Services Committee. A number
of lawmakers on the panel saw the E-3 as a duplicative
competitor to the Navy's E-2 Hawkeye, a carrier-based
airborne early warning aircraft. One vocal critic was
Rep. Patricia A. Schroeder, the liberal Democrat from
Colorado. In the Senate, the main adversary was Sen.
Thomas F. Eagleton, the liberal Missouri Democrat.
One technical argument made by critics in the program's
early years was that the AWACS radar could be easily
jammed. That would have made it ineffective in Western
Europe, they argued, because the Soviets had powerful
jamming equipment on their densely militarized side
of the Iron Curtain.
Eventually Congress voted to establish a special review
committee to investigate this claim and other AWACS
questions. Legislative language also required the Secretary
of Defense to certify that the system would work before
it could proceed in development.
In the end this arrangement worked to the program's
advantage. The review committee concluded that the
radar would in fact work, and on that basis Congress
in early 1975 released the initial batch of long-lead
money for the first six airplanes.
Skantze observed: "The committee was very helpful
in saying that it did not see [jamming] as a showstopper."
In March 1977, the first AWACS was formally delivered
to Tactical Air Command's 552nd Airborne Warning and
Control Wing at Tinker.
Production of USAF's aircraft continued until June
1984, when the last of 34 Air Force E-3s rolled off
Boeing's line. (A September 1995 crash in Alaska left
USAF with only 32 operational aircraft today. One is
assigned to Boeing for tests.)
Even at the program's inception, other nations had
a keen interest in buying AWACS's capability. The NATO
Alliance, France, Saudi Arabia, and United Kingdom
all now fly 707based AWACS aircraft, bringing
the total worldwide fleet to 66. In addition, Japan
purchased four 767based AWACS models.
Back in 1977, Skantze and others estimated that AWACS
would remain in service for some 20 or 30 years. Since
then, that figure has doubled, with current plans calling
for the aircraft to remain in service until perhaps
2035. AWACS's continuing value is due to both its operational
capabilities and its power as a symbol.
When the US deploys AWACS to a troubled region, it
shows that the Air Force means business. At the same
time, the system itself is not provocative, as it has
no inherent offensive capability.
"The thing we didn't perceive at first but which
became apparent as time passed was the ability of the
system to surveil airspace in great depth but not pose
a threatening aspect," said Skantze.
The basic E-3 aircraft is a militarized version of
Boeing's 707-320B. The most obvious modification is
the large rotodome put on the back of the airplane.
The dome is 30 feet in diameter, six feet thick, and
sits on two struts that support the radar 14 feet above
the fuselage.
Inside the dome are identification, friend or foe
and data-link fighter-control antennas and the antenna
of the powerful AWACS radar system. The radar has a
range of more than 250 miles for low-flying targets.
It can see medium- to high-altitude fliers at even
greater distance.
Data are collected, processed, and displayed on onboard
consoles for 13 to 19 mission specialists in real time.
AWACS can forward the location and track of friendly
and adversary systems to users ranging from the individual
pilot in a fighter cockpit to the White House Situation
Room--at the same time.
It can fly a mission profile for eight hours without
refueling. In-flight refueling, plus the use of an
onboard crew rest area, can extend missions greatly.

The E-3s were nameless during testing. Come delivery, that
"I Dub Thee Sentry"
As time for delivery
of the first E-3 AWACS approached in 1977,
the question was what to name it. Gen. Robert
J. Dixon, commander of Tactical Air Command,
wanted to call it Sentry.
Securing the
name, however, was the job of the developer,
Air Force Systems Command. It was up to AFSC
to run the bureaucratic and legal traps for
approval. A host of other things, including
an insurance company, were already named
Sentry. The lawyers said the E-3 would have
to be called something else.
Dixon, sometimes
known as "The Alligator" for good
reason, was not pleased. The AWACS remained
unnamed.
On delivery day
at Tinker AFB, Okla., the first airplane
taxied up to the reviewing stand. The band
played and the crowd cheered. The Alligator
stepped to the microphone and announced, "I
dub thee Sentry."
And that was
that.