On Sept. 10, 2001, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
noted in a speech that the US military was still using
a planning process designed to deal with a Soviet-style
challenge--a predictable, slowly evolving military
threat that emerges over a period of years and changes
incrementally.
The system, therefore, was ineffective for dealing
with the rapidly changing threats that had come to
characterize the post-Cold War world, said the Pentagon
chief, adding, "Our foes are more subtle and implacable
today."
The iron cage of bureaucracy prevented DOD from adapting
to evolving threats "with the speed and agility
that today's world demands," he said in his speech.
Streamlining Pentagon operations thus was "a matter
of national security." The world had become a
place where threats "arise from multiple sources,
most of which are difficult to anticipate and many
of which are impossible even to know today," he
added.
The next day was Sept. 11.
In a shocking attack, 19 al Qaeda terrorists hijacked
four US civil airliners loaded with fuel for cross-country
flights and slammed them into the World Trade Center
towers, the Pentagon, and after a passenger revolt,
an empty patch of Pennsylvania countryside, killing
3,000 all told.
On that day, the US was forced to confront the sort
of invisible and unpredictable threat Rumsfeld had
warned about and deal with an entirely new kind of
enemy and battle.
The Air Force is playing a leading role in the response
to this new security challenge, providing the aircraft
and personnel for Combat Air Patrols to secure US skies
against further airline hijackings while also supplying
bombers and airlift that were central to the war on
terrorism in Afghanistan halfway around the globe.
USAF bombers dropped most of the weapons on Taliban
and al Qaeda targets in Afghanistan during Operation
Enduring Freedom.
An oft-repeated phrase in the days after Sept. 11
was that "nothing will ever be the same." This
is not entirely true, of course, but the Air Force
has seen major, long-term changes to the way it goes
about its business.

Massachusetts
ANG F-15s were the first to scramble when the
FAA on Sept. 11 notified NORAD that something
was wrong. Here, an F-15 flies CAP over New
York City for Operation Noble Eagle. (USAF
photo by Lt. Col. William Ramsay)
Two-Front War
For starters, the service is now at war on two fronts--against
terrorism worldwide (Enduring Freedom) and to ensure
air sovereignty in the United States (Operation Noble
Eagle). Both of these missions are expected to continue
indefinitely.
After the collapse of the Soviet threat, the Air Force
perhaps understandably had grown complacent about securing
United States airspace. The United States at the height
of the Cold War was ringed by air bases with fighters
on strip alert, meaning jets were ready to scramble
on a moment's notice to intercept incoming Soviet bombers.
As the Soviet bomber threat faded into the background,
the number of bases on alert was repeatedly scaled
back, until only seven remained in September 2001.
It was an F-15 unit from the Massachusetts Air National
Guard that scrambled to New York when word came from
the Federal Aviation Administration that something
was wrong. Similarly, it was a Guard unit based at
Langley AFB, Va., that raced to Washington, D.C.
Lacking lead time, neither group of fighters was able
to reach the hijacked airliners before they struck
their targets.
Now, the Air Force has once again increased the number
of bases on alert. Although nonstop Combat Air Patrols
have ceased, CAPs are still flown on a random basis
over New York City, Washington, D.C., and other prominent
areas.
The concept of air sovereignty is viewed differently
now. Shortly after the attacks, Maj. Gen. Paul A. Weaver
Jr., the now retired director of the Air National Guard,
said scaling back alert bases in the 1990s had been
noncontroversial. The threat was seen to have dried
up, and keeping fighters and crews ready to scramble
is expensive. Similarly, North American Aerospace Defense
Command officials said the policy was for NORAD to
monitor external threats approaching the nation while
FAA watched internal activity.
On Sept. 11, this disconnect between military and
civil radar coverage worked to the advantage of the
terrorist hijackers. Because US airliners were considered
friendly by origin, NORAD depended upon FAA notification
that something was wrong that morning.
Now, cooperation between the two sides has increased
dramatically, the government is taking an interagency
approach to radar improvements, and DOD is leading
a task force charged with determining the best way
to create a common air picture for both civil and military
needs.
No More Troops
Although Congress has made additional money available
to pay for homeland security initiatives and the material
costs of the war on terrorism, Rumsfeld has indicated
no additional personnel will be forthcoming. Consequently,
the dual strains of war in Afghanistan and the homeland
air defense mission have affected many units as mission
requirements increased.
The Air National Guard unit responsible for securing
air sovereignty over the northeast US flew nonstop
Combat Air Patrols for months without significant external
help. The New Jersey ANG's 177th Fighter Wing drew
heavily on mobilized Guardsmen to meet its needs.
Over time, mission taskings began to wear heavily
on certain USAF career fields such as pilots, maintainers,
and command post operators. Officials at the 177th
FW said most Guardsmen have taken a wait-and-see attitude
toward their lives because it is unclear when the part-timers
will be demobilized and sent back to their civilian
careers.
The New Jersey F-16 pilots acutely felt the demands
of the new security environment. These pilots had to
not only defend US airspace but also suffered a long-term
training backlog. The homeland defense mission pre-empted
months of flying normally devoted to training for conventional
combat missions. According to New Jersey ANG officials,
the wing is still expected to prepare for a possible
deployment to Saudi Arabia when its normal turn comes
up in the Aerospace Expeditionary Force cycle next
year.
The New Jersey Guard's 24/7 CAPs ended last spring,
but Atlantic City Airport has now been designated a
strip alert base--meaning a minimum of two (and sometimes
six) pilots and fighters are kept ready to scramble.
Further, the base has been instructed to continue
normal operations, meaning its crews are attempting
to catch up on training missed after Sept. 11 to prepare
for their possible AEF deployment.
Planners know the competing demands can be a problem.
Maj. Gen. Timothy A. Peppe, USAF's special assistant
for AEFs, said "things have gotten to a point" in
certain instances "where training back home has
been hindered" by other wartime obligations.

American Airlines
Flight 77 hit the Pentagon at 9:38 a.m on Sept.
11. This photo shows the impact site where,
at 10:10 a.m., part of the five-sided building
collapsed. (USMC photo by Cpl. Jason Ingersoll)
Col. Mike Cosby, 177th FW commander, said the New
Jersey Guard was given the northeast air defense mission
for good reason. For starters, the base has a history
with the air defense mission--Atlantic City Airport
was an alert base until 1998, when the Guard unit was
redesignated a general-purpose unit with an air-to-ground
mission. Atlantic City is also centrally located to
likely terrorist targets.
"There are four major metropolitan areas that
this base services," Cosby said, noting that Washington,
D.C., Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York City are
all a short flight from the New Jersey base, as is
Wilmington, Del., which gets occasional CAP protection
because of the city's oil port.
The Squeeze
The 177th FW is leaning on many formerly part-time
Guardsmen to meet its staffing needs. Because of that,
Cosby said, the base is seeking additional manpower--"100,
125 additional folks full time." These individuals--primarily
aircraft maintainers--would be used to support the
extra tempo of maintaining random CAPs, sitting on
alert, and maintaining enough training sorties. Cosby
said the Noble Eagle mission in six months burned up
an entire year's worth of planned flying hours. Not
included in that total were all of the base's "regular" flying
missions.
The strip alert aircraft require maintenance and support
teams independent from those needed for regular-duty
F-16s, said MSgt. Marty Schellhas, a 177th FW crew
chief. Operating around the clock to support both strip
alerts and regular training operations, maintenance
teams now have fewer people per team but more work.
Maintenance has managed to keep its teams properly
staffed with the correct experience levels, Schellhas
said, but "it's been tough. ... We could always
use more help."
The Noble Eagle mission also began to wear on the
pilots. CAP flights are not like combat training, and
pilots are trying to make up for lost time.
"It's hard to stay focused--by your fifth or
sixth hour, you become pretty weary" on a CAP,
said Lt. Col. Randall King, 177th FW assistant operations
director.
The fire has also been turned up overseas. Although
many in government were keenly aware of the threat
Osama bin Laden posed to US interests--owing to his
suspected involvement in the bombing of the Navy destroyer Cole--a
global war on terrorism was hardly expected a year
ago.

A fully armed
F-16C from the 177th Fighter Wing of the New
Jersey ANG returns from a patrol. The unit's
24/7 operations ended in the spring, but it
still has to maintain strip alerts with pilots,
maintainers, and aircraft on call. (USAF photo
by MSgt. Don Taggart)
What the Loggies Did
Likewise, military strategists knew Afghanistan's
ruling Taliban faction harbored and supported al Qaeda
terrorists, but a war in that country wasn't in the
plans. When the time came to take the fight to the
terrorists, the Air Force basically had to improvise.
The service was suddenly responsible for moving tons
of equipment to Central Asia.
"We made it up for Afghanistan as we went along," said
Lt. Gen. Michael E. Zettler, USAF's deputy chief of
staff for installations and logistics.
There was ample "opportunity for failure" in
preparing for the operations, he said, because everything
was needed at that time in South Asia. Afghanistan,
landlocked and distant from the US network of bases
concentrated in Europe, brought bomber capabilities
to the forefront.
Early in the conflict, some fighter missions were
flown from bases in the Persian Gulf region, but the
distances involved made bomber operations much more
efficient. As was the case over Kosovo in 1999, B-2s
flew from Missouri, while the lack of air defenses
in Afghanistan made it attractive to use B-1B and B-52
bombers to attack from Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.
Navy fighters operating from big-deck carriers in
the Indian Ocean generated most of the Enduring Freedom
sorties, but Air Force bombers dropped most of the
ordnance and did the most damage. According to Air
Force officials, heavy bombers flew about 10 percent
of the early combat missions over Afghanistan, but
hit more than 70 percent of the aim points. The bombers
delivered more than 80 percent of US ordnance dropped
in the first days of the conflict.
The logistical challenges involved in fighting a war
in Afghanistan have certainly caught the attention
of senior defense planners. The regional warfighting
commanders and Air Force Secretary James G. Roche are
studying options for new contingency bases in the Asia-Pacific
region so that DOD doesn't have to start from scratch
the next time a battle must be fought in an isolated
location.
More bases are also needed because of the vast distances
to cover in the region. Otherwise, shorter-range aircraft
might not be used to their full potential.
The Air Force's role in Enduring Freedom gradually
receded into the background, but the service remains
deeply committed to the war. As of July, USAF had 9,900
airmen deployed to the Afghanistan region in support
of Enduring Freedom.
The Air Force had not anticipated sustained operations
as large as Enduring Freedom and Noble Eagle when it
created its system of rotating Aerospace Expeditionary
Forces. Rather than abandon the system, however, the
service has chosen to bolster its AEFs to support the
new steady state of operations, according to Peppe,
the AEF planner.

USAF bombers,
such as this B-1B, flew only about 10 percent
of the sorties but dropped most of the ordnance
in the early days of the war in Afghanistan.
(USAF photo by SSgt. Shane Cuomo)
The most obvious change was the need to get more people
into the AEF system so that more airmen would be available
for deployment on the scheduled 90-day rotations. Peppe
said that, as of July, some 175,000 airmen were postured
for AEF deployments through Unit Type Codes, which
link personnel to their mission. The goal, he said,
is to have well over 200,000 people postured for AEF
deployments.
"I don't think that's going to be a problem," Peppe
said, given how 18,000 airmen had been added to the
UTCs in the past month, and the goal is to have the
entire Air Force headquarters staff available for AEF
deployment if necessary. "Will they all go? No," Peppe
said--but they should be available to fill needs.
Fixing the Holes
Also helping to fill holes in the AEF system will
be the troops and equipment from two stand-alone Air
Expeditionary Wings. The AEWs, based at Mountain Home
AFB, Idaho, and Seymour Johnson AFB, N.C., were designed
to back up the 10 permanent AEFs with additional assets
as needed. However, the assets of these AEWs have not
been used very much, Peppe said, while the AEFs are
being run ragged. Thus, the Air Force in June began
to integrate AEW forces into the AEFs.

USAF active duty
and reserve members delivered millions of pounds
of cargo to central Asia for Enduring Freedom.
Here, a Wyoming ANG C-130H is unloaded in Afghanistan.
(USAF photo by TSgt. Marvin Preston)
High operational tempo generated by recent operations
is placing an exceptional burden on high-demand career
fields, and officials are now working to alleviate
this strain. For example, Peppe said that some personnel
were being deployed much longer than the standard 90-day
cycle. "Some are staying for 135 days and a small
percent will need to remain for up to 179 days," he
said.
Peppe added in July that the preference is not to
deploy anyone for more than 120 days. "That will
be the stated goal," he said.
Reaching that goal, however, will require long-term
solutions such as increased accessions into the stressed
career fields, which include security forces, air traffic
control, and crews for low-density, high-demand assets
such as Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft.
Peppe believes the AEF concept will survive the enormous
pressures generated by the post-attack US response.
He said USAF will stick with the 10-AEF force, though
it did consider going up or down. The bottom line,
he concluded, is that the Air Force is expeditionary,
and in wartime the demands go up.
And so far, they haven't come down.

Adam J. Hebert is senior correspondent for InsideDefense.com,
an Internet defense information site, and managing
editor for Defense Information and Electronics Report,
a Washington, D.C.-based defense newsletter. His most
recent article for Air Force Magazine, "The
Responsive Force," appeared in the July 2002
issue.