|
 |
 |
 |

|
| December 1999 Vol. 82, No. 12 |
|

Last June 25, a pair of Tu-95 Bear bombers raced out
of Russia and seemed to be about to enter the airspace
of Iceland, a NATO nation. Two F-15A fighters from
the Louisiana Air National Guard's 159th Fighter Wing,
which had been deployed to Reykjavik, scrambled and
rose to meet the Bears, warning them off. The Bears
turned onto another course and departed the area. The
intercept marked only another round in the continuing,
eight-decades-long history of American air defense
operations.
In 1916, no less a visionary than Alexander Graham
Bell warned about the possibility of airship raids
on the US. For the next 25 years, experts studied the
problem of air defense and lay the foundation for the
future. During World War II, there was a sizeable effort
to defend the country from aerial attack, and in the
years immediately following World War II, the Soviet
Union presented a threat in the form of Tu-4 bombers.
The US reacted slowly to the Soviet air threat, not
from slothfulness but because of the drastic adverse
effects of rapid demobilization of US Army Air Forces
and greatly shrunken postwar budgets. In time, however,
the newly independent Air Force would meet the Soviet
bomber challenge head-on with a massive response. From
a small beginning, more than a dozen ever more sophisticated
interceptor aircraft were introduced, ranging from
World War II P-61 Black Widows to today's F-15s. Total
numbers rose from a single P-61 to a peak strength
of almost 1,500 interceptors of various kinds.
In addition to the airplanes, there were sophisticated
Surface-to-Air Missiles; immense radar systems built
through the trackless Arctic; a huge, enthusiastic
Ground Observer Corps; picket ships; Texas Towers;
and airborne command-and-control aircraft. All were
integrated into a series of computer-based control
systems.

The Ground Observer Corps was reconstituted in 1950 to become part of
the first line of defense against air attacks in the post-World War
II years. Volunteers like these carried on operations until the corps
was deactivated in 1959.
|
Threats Near and Far
There were many hotly contested political issues.
At the most basic level in the Air Force, there was
concern that funds to create an "impenetrable
air defense" would be obtained by siphoning money
away from Strategic Air Command's mission of nuclear
deterrence. Apart from the intramural disputes, USAF's
battles with the Army over control of SAMs and other
issues were particularly bitter.
The initial requirement was to stop a handful of conventionally
armed piston engine-powered bombers on a one-way mission,
flying a predictable course. The threat swiftly grew
to the prospect of an attack by hundreds of turboprop
and jet bombers armed with thermonuclear weapons and
attacking from different directions. Meeting such a
threat required the creation of a huge system. It consumed
billions of dollars. It required leadership, foresight,
and brilliant science.
Even more important, its day-by-day success hinged
on the dedication of pilots, mechanics, radar operators,
and all of the other anonymous personnel who fought
off the extreme cold weather and endless hours of boredom
to stand guard against an enemy they hoped would never
come.
Air Defense Command duty was almost always difficult.
Many bases were located in the north and weather conditions
were often miserable. In the early days, bases had
few amenities, and alert crews had to stand by their
aircraft in drafty hangars. In the far north, snow
was sometimes so deep that an aircraft taking off could
not be seen until it lifted above the snow walls lining
the runway. After an intercept, landings were made
at the snowbound runway with minimum visibility and
ceiling. ADC pilots were almost always superb at their
work.
Activation of Air Defense Command took place in March
1946 at Mitchel Field, N.Y. It was part of a general
reorganization of the US Army Air Forces. It was commanded
by Lt. Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, former head of USAAF
in China. Stratemeyer drove himself, attempting to
accomplish tasks for which resources would not be forthcoming.
At the time, the leading air defense specialist was
Maj. Gen. Gordon P. Saville, who had formulated his
ideas as an instructor at the Air Corps Tactical School.
He had been heavily involved in the air defense issue
early in World War II. He even wrote AAF's handbook "Air
Defense Doctrine" in 1941.
Saville had given much serious thought to the Claire
Chennault-style warning system, which made heavy use
of ground observers connected to central filter stations.
He advocated and promoted growth of radar stations,
Ground Observer Corps, and control centers that would
be useful for the future.
The Georgia-born Saville was a tough customer who,
if he had to, would run roughshod over an opponent
to accomplish his mission. By 1944, however, most people
viewed the probability of an Axis air attack as negligible
and Saville was given other duties. It was not until
1948 that he returned to the air defense problem under
ADC and Stratemeyer.
Saville was assigned as a special projects officer
in June 1948, with the mission of reviving ADC from
the shambles of demobilization. His flamboyant personality
and regulation-defying ways were regarded as the price
the Air Force had to pay for his brilliant intellect.

F-102 Delta Daggers escort a Soviet Tu-95 Bear. The Dagger, which won
the "1954 Interceptor" competition, entered service in 1956.
At peak deployment there were more than 25 F-102 squadrons.
|
Hands-On Experience
He and his commander had a foundation for the effort.
In World War II, USAAF had acquired great experience
with air defense systems. It confronted the Luftwaffe
in three vicious years of fighting over Europe. Japan's
defenses, while less formidable than those of Nazi
Germany, presented many problems. The service also
had acquired much valuable knowledge through the development
of its own radar stations and interceptor units in
the US.
What both Stratemeyer and Saville lacked, however,
were the airplanes, personnel, and funds for ADC's
mission. Assets were almost nonexistent. There were
two night fighter squadrons. One was a purely paper
organization, while the other, initially, had one officer
and two enlisted men.
Postwar budgets for the military were cut beyond the
bone, and the services were constantly shifting and
scrambling to cover shortfalls. On Dec. 1, 1948, USAF
established the new Continental Air Command, with Stratemeyer
in charge, as a coordinating agency for ADC and Tactical
Air Command and the training of the Air National Guard
and Air Force Reserve. Simultaneously, Saville became
head of an ADC which was now a subordinate organization.
He continued to plug away at the problem, however.
As the Soviet threat became generally recognized, so
did a requirement for adequate early warning. In the
earliest effort to provide it, USAF came up with a
system in 1947 known as "Radar Fence Plan," which
called for 411 radar stations and 18 control centers
and was projected to cost $600 million. The cost of
the plan clearly exceeded the Air Force ability to
pay, and Saville was asked to develop a less expensive
version.
Saville's answer was something that became known as
the "Permanent System." It was to consist
of 85 radar stations and 11 control centers, in the
United States and Alaska. The cost was estimated to
be about $116 million, spread over the period 1949-50.
It became fully operational in April 1953.
However, the Air Force was loath to ignore the immediate
threat, and it built a temporary system, sarcastically
but aptly called "Lashup." It comprised 43
sites by 1950. The system used World War II AN/CPS-5
search radar systems that were deficient in range and
in low-altitude detection capability. In addition,
36 ANG fighter units were called to active duty for
the mission.

By the early 1960s, detecting incoming Soviet ICBMs had become more important
than intercepting an attack by Soviet bombers. NORAD expanded in the
1960s primarily in response to this new threat.
|
Back to Radar
Lashup had the great value of introducing the US again
to the concept of a radar air defense system. It was
soon augmented by three more-effective systems whose
inputs would be fed to one of the bigger gambles of
the period--the Semiautomatic Ground Environment system,
designed to control fighters and fight the air defense
battle. SAGE had begun as a concept in the Air Defense
Systems Engineering Committee, headed by eminent Massachusetts
Institute of Technology scientist George E. Valley.
Valley foresaw that computers would develop to the
point that they could be used to control an air defense
system. He was right, and he was backed by ADC commanders
throughout the years.
In the early 1950s, the Soviet military threat began
to expand rapidly. The United States responded primarily
by building up the striking power of the Air Force's
Strategic Air Command, which grew steadily in offensive
power with the acquisition of jet bombers and tankers
and, later, Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles. Deterrence
occupied the top rung of the strategic ladder.
Yet the requirement for air defense was by then widely
recognized. ADC was reinstated as a full major command
in January 1951, with Lt. Gen. Ennis C. Whitehead as
commander and ADC headquarters established at Ent AFB,
Colo. More importantly, the air defense mission now
began to receive major appropriations. It was used
mainly to buy an adequate interceptor force, and ADC
operated a succession of ever more sophisticated radar
systems supplemented by advanced SAMs.
The Royal Canadian Air Force proved to be a boon partner
with the United States, both in the responsibilities
it assumed in the construction of the warning systems
and in the provision of effective air defense squadrons.
In some respects, the air defense mission was to RCAF
what the nuclear deterrent mission was to USAF--its
No. 1 reason for being.
In the early 1950s, the two North American air forces
launched construction of the Pinetree Line and completed
it in June 1954. Consisting of 33 stations, it extended
on both sides of the international border and provided
warning and ground-control-intercept activities. The
United States paid for 22 of the stations and provided
personnel for 18.
Canada then constructed the Mid-Canada Line, building
it entirely with its own resources. Built along the
55th parallel, the early warning system was also called
the McGill Line, after the scientists at McGill University
who planned and designed it. Not so much a radar warning
line as an unmanned microwave fence, the line signaled
when something-anything-flew over it. The Mid-Canada
Line became operational in 1957 and cost approximately
$220 million.
Above the Arctic Circle
It was then that military officials began to entertain
the prospect of building a warning line in the far
north, inside the Arctic Circle. High cost projections
disturbed Air Force leaders, who believed the money
could be better spent on bomb shelters and base dispersal
efforts. However, USAF conducted experiments in conjunction
with the Lincoln Laboratory of MIT and became convinced
that a Distant Early Warning Line was feasible.
Once again working in cooperation with Canada's air
force, USAF in December 1954 placed a contract for
the construction of the DEW Line.
The DEW Line, built along an irregular path extending
from Cape Lisburne, Alaska, to the west coast of Greenland,
with auxiliary stations situated even further east,
was a mammoth undertaking. It was the largest construction
project ever attempted in the Arctic, and it required
the movement of hundreds of shiploads of material and
thousands of sorties by American transport airplanes.
The workforce toiled day and night, seven days a week,
to make the July 31, 1957, date when responsibility
was to be transferred to USAF. Twenty-five lives were
lost in the process.
The "White Alice" communications system
was built to link airborne warning and control aircraft
with the DEW Line radar. Ultimately, 49 sites were
built, extending along the Aleutian archipelago out
to Shemya, Alaska. There were few places where boredom
was more pervasive.
The success of the DEW Line smoothed the way for the
creation of the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System,
which was completed in 1963 after five years of intensive
effort. The BMEWS sites included Thule AB in Greenland,
Clear AS in Alaska, and RAF Fylingdales Moor in England.
In addition, the number of radar stations had increased
dramatically during the decade of the 1950s, with 300
small automatic radar sites adding coverage.
The Pinetree, Mid-Canada, and DEW Lines all were integrated
into the SAGE system. The SAGE project had gotten a
major boost from the ADC commander, the brilliant Gen.
Benjamin W. Chidlaw. Chidlaw had done remarkable work
during World War II, supervising some of the most advanced
projects at Wright Field in Ohio before becoming a
combat commander in Europe. When he took command of
ADC in August 1951, he concluded that it had the capability
to destroy only about 10 percent of an incoming bomber
force, and he was determined to improve the situation
with technology. Chidlaw's answer was SAGE, which he
promoted relentlessly.
After years of development effort, the SAGE system
became operational on June 26, 1958, when the New York
sector came on line. Air Force enthusiasm for SAGE
led to the planning of an intricate network of eight
air defense regions within the continental United States
and 32 SAGE direction centers. It was linked to 54
fighter-interceptor squadrons backed up by 66 Nike-Ajax
SAM battalions.
Shifting Emphasis
In the early 1960s, however, SAGE was overtaken by
events, as USAF shifted its emphasis away from intercepting
bombers and toward the detection of ICBMs. It also
had initial operating difficulties, with operators
tending to prefer well-known manual techniques of controlling
interceptors rather than relying on automated information.
SAGE was never tested in battle, but it gave the US
Air Force a crash course in computer technology that
would stand it in good stead in the future.
The need to extend the radar warning lines and to
fill gaps in coverage, particularly for low-flying
aircraft, led to the use of other means of detection.
In 1953, USAF began using the EC-121 Warning Star
as an early warning aircraft. The military EC-121s
flew out of Otis AFB, Mass., on the East Coast and
McClellan AFB, Calif., in the west. Eventually, USAF
operated 11 squadrons. The early EC-121s had relatively
primitive electronic systems and were not very reliable.
Over time, however, the equipment improved and the
EC-121s could be linked directly to the SAGE network.
The success of the EC-121s could be attributed to the
aircrews who flew the long missions and to the patience
of the ground crews who kept the maintenance-prone
airplanes airborne. The success of the EC-121s led
to the later generation of the E-3 Airborne Warning
and Control System aircraft.
The Air Force took some unconventional steps, too.
It even harked back to the early 1940s by reconstituting
a Ground Observer Corps. During World War II, more
than 1.5 million US civilians had trained in the GOC.
They were almost too enthusiastic, though, and tended
to deluge Ground Control Intercept sites with well-meaning
but unhelpful phone calls. The program was discontinued
in 1944. In February 1950, Whitehead called for a Ground
Observer Corps of 160,000 members to help plug the
gaps in low-altitude coverage. The GOC was not deactivated
until 1959.

The BOMARC--shown here at Cape Canaveral AFB, Fla.--was USAF's ground-fired
weapon for area defense and was operational from 1959 to the 1970s.
Deployed at 10 sites, BOMARCs were integrated into the SAGE system.
|
The radical extent to which USAF would go for radar
warning time was best evidenced by the sea-based platforms
called Texas Towers. These resembled oil-drilling rigs
and were placed on shoals about 100 miles off the northeast
coast of the United States. The Air Force proposed
five towers, but only three were built. The first,
Texas Tower Two (TT-2), began operation 110 miles east
of Cape Cod in December 1955.
A staff of 54 was installed on each tower, which would
roll and groan from being pitched in the sea swells
and from vibration of equipment. It was difficult duty,
and it turned tragic on Jan. 15, 1961, when all 28
members of a caretaker crew died when a winter gale
caused the collapse of TT-4. The last of the towers,
TT-3, was decommissioned in 1963.
The question of who was to control US air defense
became a source of considerable tension between the
Air Force and the Army. The Army wished to retain control
of its anti-aircraft artillery and felt that their
claim was enhanced by development of the Hawk and Nike
series of Surface-to-Air Missiles. The Air Force developed
its own SAM, the BOMARC (for Boeing-Michigan Aeronautical
Research Center), and wished to control all aspects
of air defense, including ground-fired weapons.
It was a difficult issue, going to the very heart
of roles and missions. Defense authorities ultimately
decided that the Army would deploy the Nike for point
defense and the Air Force would deploy BOMARC for area
defense.
BOMARC was an ambitious project. Seven years of testing
passed before the missile became operational in 1959.
Some 500 nuclear-tipped BOMARCs were deployed at 10
sites (two in Canada), and the missile was integrated
into the SAGE system. Performance was remarkable for
the time, with a speed of about Mach 2.5, a ceiling
of 80,000 feet, and a range of 200 miles. BOMARC's
onboard radar guided it to its target. The proximity-fused
nuclear warhead was intended for use against Soviet
formations. The missile stayed in service until the
early 1970s.
Birth of NORAD
The Army didn't like the Air Force's organizational
ideas, either. In 1954, Chidlaw produced a plan for
a US Air Defense Command, a joint command featuring
close coordination and cooperation of Army, Navy, and
USAF units concerned with air defense. He also suggested
that Canada be invited to participate. The Army was
outraged and expressed its deep disapproval.
The Army's reaction notwithstanding, the Joint Chiefs
of Staff embraced Chidlaw's idea, using it as the basis
for the formation, in 1954, of Continental Air Defense
Command. Chidlaw himself became the first commander
of the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based CONAD, which was
the progenitor of North American Air (now Aerospace)
Defense Command, established in 1957.
NORAD expanded greatly in the 1960s but principally
because of the emerging Soviet ICBM threat. Robert
S. McNamara, Secretary of Defense in the Kennedy and
Johnson Administrations, concluded that the ICBM problem
was so overwhelming that it rendered relatively inconsequential
the threat of Soviet bomber attack. The American air
defense system had risen from postwar wreckage to become
the most sophisticated ever, but, with the rise of
the ICBM, emphasis on air defense against bombers went
into a sharp decline.
ADC's mission was reduced over time. In 1980, ADC
was once again inactivated, and its assets were divided
between the Air Force's Tactical Air Command and Strategic
Air Command. Today, ADC's proud heritage is maintained
by NORAD, Air Combat Command, the Air National Guard,
and the Air Force Reserve, as was made clear on a recent
day in the skies around Iceland.
The Lineage of the Air Defense
Fighter
When the Cold War
began, bomber technology was ascendant and
would continue to be so for more than a decade.
That P-61 did not have the capabilities to
engage the Soviet Tu-4 bomber. Its successor,
the F-82 Twin Mustang, was even more disappointing.
It took a long time to get into production
and did not perform well in inclement weather.
The early jet fighters, such as the P-80 and P-84, lacked all-weather
capability and were deemed useless for air defense purposes. Much hope
was placed on two jet-powered interceptors, the XP-87 Blackhawk and the
XP-89 Scorpion. (Designations changed to XF-87 and XF-89.) They, in their
turn, proved to be inadequate. The XF-87 was cancelled and the Scorpion
had to undergo extensive redesign.
While the Scorpions were maturing, the F-94 Starfire was pressed into
service as an "interim" interceptor. North American in 1949
pushed an interceptor version of the Sabre, the F-86D. Despite the demands
its complexity made upon a single pilot, the F-86D was backed by senior
Air Force officials. Some 2,504 would be built and it would in time be
the most numerous interceptor in the Air Defense Command fleet, with
more than 1,000 in service by the end of 1955.
The F-86D was not ideal, however, for its afterburner consumed a great
deal of fuel in getting it to altitude, and the pilot was overburdened
by cockpit tasks.
At the same time that a decision was made to use the F-86D, a design
competition for a "1954 Interceptor" was held by the Air Force.
Criteria for the 1954 Interceptor included long range, supersonic speed,
and high-altitude capability. It was to be integrated with the ground-based
radar system and be guided automatically to the target. The interceptor's
own radar and fire-control system would make the interception, fire the
weapons, and then guide the aircraft automatically back to the home field.
The winner of the competition--the F-102 Delta Dagger--did not enter
service until 1956, and then only to serve as a stopgap until the arrival
of the F-106 Delta Dart. "The Six" became operational in 1959,
and, when the bugs were worked out, met all of the expectations of the
1954 Interceptor competition. However, the 200 black boxes of the MA-1
system were a maintenance challenge.
To augment the interceptor force, ADC brought the F-104 Starfighter into
service in 1956 and the F-101B Voodoo in 1959. The F-104 was too small
to house all the necessary equipment for a first line interceptor. It
was retired to the Air National Guard by 1960. The F-101s proved to be
excellent interceptors, almost equal to the F-106s, and remained in service
until the 1980s. |
Walter J. Boyne, former director of the National Air
and Space Museum in Washington, is a retired Air Force
colonel and author. He has written more than 400 articles
about aviation topics and 29 books, the most recent of
which is Beyond the Horizons: The Lockheed Story. His
most recent article for Air Force Magazine, "Route
Pack 6," appeared in the November 1999 issue.
Copyright Air Force Association. All rightsreserved.
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|