|
The idea that space is a natural extension of the vertical dimensionand
thus an Air Force birthrighthas been a part of USAF folklore
for so long that most airmen accept it uncritically. Nothing, however,
could be further from the truth.
Even a cursory review of Air Force involvement in space shows that
the service has been engaged in a continuous struggle with the other
branches and various political interests for control of military
space.
 |
| At left, a V-2 is launched
from White Sands Missile Range, N.M. At right, an early Atlas
missile lifts off from the USAF Missile Test Center, Patrick
AFB, Fla. Far right, a Titan IV with an inertial upper stage
is launched from Cape Canaveral AFS, Fla. |
Todays Air Force planners would do well to recall the history
of that struggle. It is a cautionary tale, one that shows the folly
of presuming that space should somehow be viewed as a natural Air
Force inheritance, never to be challenged again.
The first post-World War II manifestation of interest in military
space came not from the US Army Air Forces (AAF), as one might have
expected, but from the Navy. A group of US naval officers had been
conducting a satellite feasibility study, and, in early 1946, they
sought to carve out for the Navy a leading role in military satellite
development.
Those early postwar years also saw the green Armythat
is, the nonflying part of the serviceseeking a niche in space.
Through its Operation Paperclip, the Army brought some 130 German
rocket scientists to White Sands, N.M., along with some 100 V-2
rockets and reams of technical data from the German missile and
launch facility at Peenemunde. Before long, Army spokesmen began
characterizing rockets as a natural extension of artillery.
In reaction, AAF leaders moved with dispatch to challenge the space
pretensions of the other services.
LeMays View
For one thing, AAFs deputy chief of staff for research and
development, then-Maj. Gen. Curtis E. LeMay, declined the Navys
request for the AAF to participate in its satellite initiative.
Moreover, LeMay insisted that satellite development should be handed
over to the Army Air Forces, on the grounds that satellites represented
an extension of strategic airpower.
LeMay turned to AAFs newly established Project Rand. He wanted
to tap Rands then-unmatched scientific and engineering talent
for a crash inquiry into the prospects of orbiting an Earth satellite.
Within three weeks, rand had produced its now-famous study of a
world-circling spaceship. That study eventually became
widely recognized as the worlds first comprehensive satellite
feasibility assessment.
Armed with the Rand report, LeMay argued strenuously for AAFs
primacy in satellite research and development and sought control
over any future US military effort to develop a satellite. He claimed
that any such satellite was a matter of strategic aviation,
the AAFs natural responsibility.
Once the Air Force gained independence from the Army in 1947, its
leading generals pressed harder to be assigned control of any future
military satellite and missile development.
Even so, the new armed service was at first hesitant to actually
undertake the development of missiles and satellites for strategic
use. Interest in satellites, rockets, and space launch capabilities
was overshadowed by the services commitment to heavy bombers
and air-breathing, nonballistic missiles.
The Air Force followed the recommendations of its new Scientific
Advisory Board and focused almost exclusively on the development
of intra-atmospheric aircraft and jet propulsion systems that promised
great near-term combat potential.
 |
| LeMay, shown at left as vice
chief of staff, with Air Force Secretary James Douglas and Gens.
Thomas White and Nathan Twining, pushed for AAF then USAF to
lead satellite development as a matter of strategic aviation. |
In 1950, however, the Truman Administration, in a key decision,
gave the Air Force formal responsibility for developing long-range
strategic missiles and short-range theater missiles. Using that
decision, USAF outmaneuvered the Army, which wanted to extend the
range of its Redstone missile beyond 200 miles.
Thereafter, development of land-based strategic missiles would
be an exclusive Air Force preserve.
Air Force satellite and ballistic missile programs faced practical
problems, however. Some continued to harbor doubts about their military
value. An economic downturn brought austerity to the defense program.
Forced to choose between manned aircraft or missiles and satellites,
the Air Force elected to concentrate on improving its aircraft forces.
The slump lasted well into the 1950s.
In the mid-1950s, USAF still lacked an accepted space mission and
found itself beset by powerful Army and Navy efforts to dominate
the medium. The Naval Research Laboratory, having initiated a satellite
effort in 1945, was managing the civilian Vanguard satellite program.
The Army Ballistic Missile Agency in Huntsville, Ala., was insisting
that the Army possessed the greatest wherewithal for pursuing military
space applications. Army officials claimed space was merely the
high ground, the taking of which was a traditional Army mission.
Army, Navy Successes
Three months after the successful launching of Sputnik in October
1957, the Armys Explorer 1 became the first US satellite to
achieve orbit. That and the Navys subsequent success with
Vanguard gave those services operational and bureaucratic advantages
in the space arena.
At Congressional hearings, each service was given an opportunity
to state its case. So were the Department of Defense, National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics, and Atomic Energy Commission. Each sought
to persuade the Eisenhower Administration and Congress of its special
claim to the space mission.
At the end of 1958, USAF decided to launch a full-court press for
control of military space. Gen. Bernard A. Schriever played a pivotal
role by arguing that the Air Forces near monopoly in managing
and operating the nations military space systems demonstrated
that it should acquire even greater responsibilities.
Ultimately, thanks in large part to Schrievers determined
effort, the Air Force emerged from the post-Sputnik interservice
struggle over space with the lions share of the mission. Soon,
Congress increased the Air Forces space funding by a factor
of 120, from $2.2 million to $249.7 million.
With the advent of the Kennedy Administration in 1961, the Air Force
reached another important milestone.
Presidential science advisor Jerome B. Wiesner issued a new report
that assailed the Pentagons fractionated military space
program and called for a single manager of DODs diverse
systems and activities. Wiesner maintained that the Air Force was
the logical choice to do so, given that it was already providing
90 percent of the space-related resources and support for the other
services and defense agencies.
Two months later, President Kennedy approved a Pentagon directive
giving the Air Force responsibility for the bulk of the space effort.
USAF became the lead space service and, as such, the de facto executive
agent for military space.
In that directive, Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara formally
designated the Air Force as the military service for space R&D,
mandating that any exceptions to that rule had to be authorized
by him personally. That directive largely foreclosed service wrangling
over space in the Kennedy years.
In the meantime, the highly classified Corona satellite reconnaissance
program was finally hitting pay dirt after failing 14 straight times.
On Aug. 18, 1960, a Corona satellite snapped the worlds first
image of Soviet territory from space. On Aug. 19, USAF Capt. Harold
E. Mitchell, flying a modified C-119J, used two trailing wire hooks
to snag a descending Corona capsule over the Pacific.
Some pressed to have the Corona program, the U-2 spyplane program,
and the Satellite and Missile Observation System (SAMOS) handed
over to a civilian defense agency. Instead, the Air Forces
Office of Missile and Satellite Systems was redesignated the National
Reconnaissance Office and was headed by the undersecretary of the
Air Force.
 |
| Gen. Thomas White (left), USAF
Chief of Staff (1957-61), said in 1958 that space was a continuation
of the vertical dimension, meaning it was Air Force territory.
Above, he talks with Lt. Gen. Thomas Power. |
Thanks to that move, the Air Force was able to retain at least
nominal ownership of Corona, although its assignment to the civilian
Air Force secretariat and the subordination of its tasking to the
Director of Central Intelligence effectively cut the uniformed Air
Force out of Coronas day-to-day affairs.
Operational Space
For the first decade or so of military space, those who created
space systems were devoted principally to the mission of nuclear
deterrence. That was to change dramatically. It became clear by
the mid-1970s that fielded military space assets offered great potential
to the conventional warfighting community.
The first glimmer of an effort to bring space into the mainstream
came in the mid-1960s, when then-Col. Robert T. Marsh suggested
that a space directorate be established within the Air Staff. Marsh
also saw a need for a separate space directorate within Air Force
Systems Command (AFSC). He briefed these suggestions in 1965 to
the Air Forces Chief of Staff, Gen. John P. McConnell, who
quickly approved them.
For the most part, however, the Air Forces assorted space
activities remained more a focus of R&D and acquisition activity
than a day-to-day concern of Air Force operators. USAF showed little
interest in space operations as a core institutional goal.
Then, in 1977, Gen. David C. Jones, Air Force Chief of Staff, issued
a major space policy letter portraying development of space weapons
and concepts as a key USAF responsibility. Later in Jones
tenure as Chief, the Air Staff prepared a study of future space
objectives. It repeated a 1958 statement by then-Chief of Staff
Gen. Thomas D. White that space was but a continuation of the vertical
dimension.
That study further maintained that the Air Force deserved to manage
all US military space activities because it possessed both a rich
history of working in space and a near monopoly on space technology
expertise.
Even before Jones move, some had taken key steps toward creation
of a separate Air Force Space Command. Its proponents clearly understood
air and space to be separate and distinct operating mediums and
recognized that the Air Forces space and space-related operational
functions warranted an organizational home of their own.
Example: Gen. W.L. Bill Creech, commander of Tactical
Air Command, freely acknowledged that the Air Forces embryonic
F-15-launched antisatellite (ASAT) demonstrator weapon entailed
a space-specific mission application that did not properly belong
in TAC, even though the ASAT was to be carried by a TAC-operated
fighter. Creech was happy to see TAC relieved of that duty.
Rap on Systems Command
Indeed, Creech and Marsh (by then, the four-star commander of AFSC)
were working to convince fellow commanders that the time had come
to have a dedicated operational command for space to take over from
Systems Command. Eventually, all commanders came on board. This
included the head of Strategic Air Command, despite SACs initial
concern that a new space command would infringe on its prerogatives
regarding space warning systems.
Air Force Systems Command came to be viewed as doing things of
an operational nature in space that it had no business doing. Such
activity, according to commanders, made no more sense than having
Systems Commands Aeronautical Systems Division running Air
Force fighter wings or Electronic Systems Division developing concepts
of operations for the E-3 Airborne Warning and Control System.
 |
| Gen. Bernard Schriever in 1958
said that USAF, as the largest stakeholder in space systems
and operations, should get even greater responsibilities. His
efforts energized lawmakers to grant USAF additional space funding.
|
The establishment of Air Force Space Command in 1982 and the unified
US Space Command in 1985 was directly traceable to that logic. As
Air Force Space Commands first commander, Gen. James V. Hartinger,
remarked several years later, We were looking at space with
a different perspective. Space is a place, like the land, the sea,
or the air. Its a theater of operations, and it was just a
matter of time until we treated it as such.
On Nov. 19, 1983, Air Force Space Command assumed stewardship of
the Space Plan, the first Air Force-endorsed concept since the early
1960s. This plan for the first time defined the four now-familiar
military space mission areas of space support, force enhancement,
space control, and force application. Its genesis was in the continued
organizational tension between Systems Command and Space Command
on the key question of who had principal responsibility for space.
This issue was forced into the open in 1987 when the Secretary
of the Air Force, Edward C. Aldridge Jr., released a white paper
on space policy and leadership. It noted that the defense establishment
believed that USAF only grudgingly supported space activities.
The paper further charged that USAF had failed to exhibit
a sense of institutional purpose or responsibility toward space
and relegated space to a distant fourth priority behind bomber,
fighter, and mobility activities.
Other services, sensing weakness, were quick to roll in on the
Air Force. Outside challenges to USAFs stewardship of space
resurfaced. In a clear bid to exploit USAF vulnerability, the Army
and Navy produced independent space master plans.
The Air Force countered by laying out explicit goals, starting
with the declaration of a new policy reasserting USAFs claim
to be lead service for space, while conceding that this
did not imply an exclusive Air Force role.
That task was taken up in the single most important USAF space
document to datethe report of the so-called Blue Ribbon Panel
on Space Roles and Missions, commissioned in 1988 by the Chief of
Staff, Gen. Larry D. Welch.
Welch wanted the panel to address the full spectrum of military
space concerns. The panel was aware that the service for 30 years
had been at the forefront of military space activity and provided
three-fourths of the Pentagons space budget. Still, the panel
zeroed in hard on the Air Forces alleged ambivalence toward
the space mission. It concluded that the Air Force leaderships
declared commitment to the space mission was in no way universally
shared by rank and file members.
In its final report, the Blue Ribbon Panel called for the Air Force
to have the principal but not exclusive role as the DOD agent for
military space. It also advocated a deliberate USAF pursuit of capabilities
for performing warfighting functions in and from space. It recommended
that Air Force Space Command continue to be the central advocate,
operator, and manager for military space support (launch and operation
of satellites) and that US Space Command return to Air Force Space
Command peacetime control of Air Force space assets.
In February 1989, the Air Staff issued an implementation plan,
stating that the Air Force is and will be responsible for
the global employment of military power above the Earths surface.
It directed Air Force Space Command to develop a space roadmap to
update the Space Plan by integrating all Air Force space activities
and tying the latter to warfighter needs, national strategy, and
the four specified mission areas of space support, force enhancement,
space control, and force application.
Equal to Airpower
The plan further anticipated that space power would
eventually become as important as airpower in future warfare and
declared that the Air Force must accordingly orient its thinking
and activities toward preparing for the evolution of space
power from combat support to the full spectrum of military capabilities.
In October 1990, Systems Command finally turned over its launch
centers, ranges, bases, and Delta II and Atlas E launch missions,
with provision for the remaining Atlas II, Titan II, and Titan IV
missions to be handed over in due course.
 |
| Gen. David Jones (left), Chief
of Staff (1974-78), here with Gen. George Brown, JCS Chairman,
issued a major space policy letter in 1977 that set development
of space weapons and concepts as a central Air Force mission.
|
The struggle wasnt over, however. In January 2001, the Congressionally
mandated Space Commission recommended some major organizational
realignments of the military space program. In May 2001, Secretary
of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld designated the Air Force to be the
DOD executive agent for space.
However, the commissions work raised the issue ofand
perhaps laid the groundwork forcreation of a separate Space
Corps within the Air Force and possibly an independent space
service in the not-too-distant future.
At the moment, the commission reported, the disadvantages
... outweigh the advantages.
Still, the panel members said they could foresee the day when the
commander of Air Force Space Command becomes head of Space Corps
and would join the deliberations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
when space-related issues are on the agenda. They also saw
the prospect of a Space Department if future conditions support
that step more quickly than appears likely from the commissions
vantage point today.
Benjamin S. Lambeth is a senior staff member at Rand. He is the author of The Transformation of American Air Power (2000) and NATO’s Air War for Kosovo (2001). This article was extracted from his just-published Rand report “Mastering the Ultimate High Ground” (Rand, 2003), written as a contribution to a larger Rand Project Air Force effort, entitled “Thinking Strategically About Space,” for the US Air Force. Lambeth’s most recent article for Air Force Magazine, “Footing the Bill for Military Space,” appeared in the August 2003 issue.
Copyright Air Force Association. All rights reserved.
|