|

Despite damage, a B-17 stays in formation and drops its bombs. British
leaders were skeptical of AAF plans to conduct daytime strategic
bombing of Germany.
|
Sixty years ago, in January 1943, the US Army Air
Forces leadership squared off against Britain's air
ministry and Prime Minister Winston Churchill on the
key issue of strategic bombing. The decision that was
reached at a 10-day conference in Casablanca, French
Morocco, marked a critical turning point in World War
II.
Allied heads of state and the Combined Chiefs of Staff
at the Casablanca Conference, the second of the Anglo-American
wartime meetings, faced this question: Should the AAF
continue its daylight strategic bombing campaign or
join the Royal Air Force in night bombing operations
against Nazi Germany?
The Allies had to decide where to attack after completing
the North African campaign. By late 1942, there already
were signs that the Allies were beginning to take the
offensive against the Axis powers.
In the Southwest Pacific, Maj. Gen. George C. Kenney's
Fifth Air Force had gained air superiority over Japan,
and by 1943, Buna, Papua (a critical point in the battle
for New Guinea), fell to the Allies. Previously, in
May and June 1942, Japan had suffered heavy losses
in the battle of the Coral Sea and Midway island. On
Guadalcanal, the tide had turned in favor of the US
Marines.
On the other Axis front, the Allies had invaded North
Africa in early November 1942 under the code name Operation
Torch and soon showed good progress. In late November,
after the Allies defeated the Nazis in Tunisia, President
Franklin D. Roosevelt recommended to Churchill that
Britain, Russia, and the US convene a military conference.
Roosevelt seemed certain that Soviet Premier Joseph
Stalin would want to attend. Churchill willingly accepted
since, as he said, "At present we have no plan
for 1943 which is on the scale or up to the level of
events."
As it turned out, Stalin declined the invitation,
saying he was too busy repelling the Germans at Stalingrad.
However, the meeting stood, because Churchill wanted
to gain American approval for a Mediterranean strategy
that called for an attack on Italy in 1943. Churchill
believed that hitting the underbelly of Hitler's Fortress
Europa would force Germany to scatter its forces, making
a final Allied blow against the European continent
less costly.
Churchill also believed that Roosevelt, having been "in
for a penny" with Operation Torch, would send
US forces "in for a pound" to continue operations
in the Mediterranean.
Roosevelt, in fact, was inclined to accept the Mediterranean
strategy, but US military leaders were not. They had
been opposed to the North African thrust, considering
it more a political move than a sound military step.
Instead of pushing on into Italy, said Gen. George
C. Marshall, US Army Chief of Staff, the Allies should
invade across the English Channel as soon as possible.
"The Mediterranean is a blind alley to which
American forces had only been committed because of
the President's insistence that they should fight the
Germans somewhere," Marshall argued.

Maj. Gen. Carl "Tooey" Spaatz (left), Twelfth Air Force commander,
confers with Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder. Spaatz, like Arnold,
Andrews, and Eaker, met with Churchill privately, pressing the case
for daytime bombing.
|
Day vs. Night Bombing
Meanwhile another Allied argument intensified in the
run-up to the Casablanca Conference. RAF Air Chief
Marshal Charles A. "Peter" Portal wanted
the AAF to join the RAF in night bombing, since during
daytime, the B-17 bomber would be vulnerable to Luftwaffe
fighters.
Because the RAF's Bomber Command had suffered heavy
losses during daylight raids, Portal thought nighttime
bombing was the right approach. Air Chief Marshal Arthur
T. "Bomber" Harris, commander of RAF Bomber
Command, concurred and said that area bombing or city-busting
could wreck the German economy and war machine, making
an Allied invasion unnecessary.
However, one RAF official who had met with AAF leaders
during 1941 discussions in Washington, D.C., knew they
wanted to conduct daytime bombing over Germany. Air
Vice Marshal John C. Slessor, assistant chief, Air
Staff (Plans), sent a note to the British secretary
of state for air, Archibald S.M. Sinclair, explaining
that the US was deeply committed to daylight precision
bombing.
Slessor pointed out that Lt. Gen. Henry H. "Hap" Arnold,
AAF Commanding General, Maj. Gen. Carl A. "Tooey" Spaatz,
Twelfth Air Force commander, and Maj. Gen. Ira C. Eaker,
Eighth Air Force commander, were convinced that, once
they had bombers in sufficient numbers, they could
do the job in the daytime. He wrote: "Americans
are much like other people--they prefer to learn from
their own experience. If their policy of day bombing
proves to their own satisfaction to be unsuccessful
or prohibitively expensive, they will abandon it and
turn to night action. ... But they will not do this
until they are convinced of the necessity. And they
will only learn from their own experience. In spite
of some admitted defects--including lack of experience--their
leadership is of a high order, and the quality of their
aircrew personnel is magnificent. If, in the event,
they have to abandon day bombing policy, that will
prove that it is indeed impossible. I do not believe
it will prove to be so."
Churchill was not convinced. The Americans, he stated,
would suffer heavy losses during the day, and it was
necessary to convince them to join the RAF force at
night. Sinclair, however, warned Churchill that the
Americans were committed to daylight bombing. Should
the British continue to question this campaign, it
would jeopardize the entire bombing offensive against
Germany and potentially encourage an American swing
to the Pacific.
The Eaker Ploy
The debate continued into late December 1942, when
Portal finally joined Sinclair and Slessor in the view
that pushing the AAF on this issue could cause deep
resentment and have a lasting negative effect on the
air war. However, Arnold wanted to take no chances
with the fundamental concept of US strategic airpower.
He asked Lt. Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, commander in
chief, Allied Air Forces North Africa, to send Eaker
to Casablanca for fear that Churchill still might convince
Roosevelt to shift Eighth Air Force to nighttime bombing.
On Jan. 15, 1943, Eaker arrived in Casablanca. The
British had come to the conference armed with position
papers and a comprehensive agenda. Churchill brought
his top military leaders--Field Marshal Alan F. Brooke,
Portal, Maj. Gen. Hastings Ismay, Admiral of the Fleet
Dudley Pound, Admiral Louis Mountbatten, and Slessor--backed
by a large staff.
"We Americans were unprepared," recalled
Col. Jacob E. Smart, who accompanied Arnold. "The
President had failed to inform the Chiefs of the armed
services of the nature of the meetings. The Chiefs
came without agreed position papers. The unprepared
Americans could only react to well-prepared positions--all
prepared from the British point of view. We felt that
we had been duped."
Arnold had prepped Eaker. "The President is under
pressure from the Prime Minister to abandon day bombing
and put all our bomber force in England into night
operations along with--and preferably under the control
of--the RAF," Arnold told Eaker.
Eaker was furious. "That is absurd," he
replied to Arnold. "It represents complete disaster.
It will permit the Luftwaffe to escape. The cross-channel
operation will then fail. Our planes are not equipped
for night bombing; our crews are not trained for it.
... If our leaders are that stupid, count me out. I
don't want any part of such nonsense."
Arnold emphasized that Churchill needed to be persuaded
and said he would arrange for Eaker to meet with the
Prime Minister, who in fact thought highly of the Eighth
Air Force commander.
Arnold had also made other plans. He arranged for
Spaatz and Lt. Gen. Frank M. Andrews , commander, US
Forces in the Middle East (who had flown in from Cairo,
Egypt), to talk with the Prime Minister prior to the
Churchill-Eaker meeting. Arnold, himself, already had
pressed the case for continued daylight bombing with
Churchill.
On Jan. 18, for 30 minutes, Eaker met with Churchill--dressed
in his air commodore's uniform--at the Prime Minister's
villa. Churchill stressed that, despite months of building
up, the Americans had yet to drop a single bomb on
Germany. He was skeptical of the daylight bombing concept. "I
had regretted," he wrote in his memoirs, "that
so much effort had been put into the daylight bombing
and still thought that a concentration upon night bombing
by the Americans would have resulted in far larger
delivery of bombs on Germany."
Eaker predicted that by the end of January his bombers
would be hitting targets in the Third Reich. The Eighth
Air Force commander then proceeded to make the case
for day bombing and gave the Prime Minister a one-page
exposition of his rationale. Eaker emphasized that
the Eighth had been held back by lack of long-range
fighter escort, the commitment to Operation Torch,
and by poor weather. He also pointed out that the Eighth's
loss rate in daytime was lower than the RAF's at night.
Day bombing, Eaker noted, would complement the night
effort. The RAF, flying at night, would be guided by
fires set by day--an around-the-clock offensive. "The
devils will get no rest," he said. Since AAF crews
had been trained to bomb in daytime, Eaker explained,
if they operated at night, their losses would increase.
It would take months for the AAF to prepare for effective
night operations.
Eaker wrote in the position paper: "We have built
up slowly and painfully and learned our job in a new
theater against a tough enemy. Then we were torn down
and shipped away to Africa. Now we have just built
back up again. Be patient, give us our chance, and
your reward will be ample--a successful day bombing
offensive to combine and conspire with the admirable
night bombing of the RAF to wreck German industry,
transportation, and morale--soften the Hun for land
invasion and the kill."

A B-17 crew is forced to bail out over enemy territory. Fortress crews
trained for daylight bombing of Germany, but such missions made them
more vulnerable to attack by enemy fighters.
|
Skill and Tenacity Win
According to Churchill, Eaker pleaded his case "with
skill and tenacity." If not sold by it, Churchill
was certainly impressed. "Young man," he
said, "you have not convinced me you are right,
but you have persuaded me that you should have further
opportunity to prove your contention. How fortuitous
it would be if we could, as you say, 'bomb the devils
around the clock.' When I see your President at lunch
today, I shall tell him that I withdraw my suggestion
that US bombers join the RAF in night bombing and that
I now recommend that our joint effort, day and night
bombing, be continued for a time."
The Eaker-Churchill meeting proved to be one of the
critical turning points of the war in Europe. Arnold
recalled, "We had won a major victory, for we
would bomb in accordance with American principles,
using methods for which our planes were designed."
Churchill said, later, "I decided to back Eaker
and his theme, and I turned round completely and withdrew
all my opposition to the daylight bombing by the Fortresses."
The Prime Minister seemed willing to let the matter
drop, said Arnold. "It was quite evident to me
he had been harassed by some of his own people about
our daylight bombing program and had to put up a fight
on the subject," he added. "Whether they
were fearful we would use our airplanes ineffectively
in the daylight missions; whether they were afraid
we would waste airplanes; or whether they feared we
would do something they could not and had not been
able to do, I do not know."
By the day of the Eaker-Churchill meeting, the Combined
Chiefs of Staff still had failed to agree on an overall
strategic concept for pressing the war. This failure
to set priorities for 1943 threatened to scuttle the
conference. As Slessor recalled, "Tempers were
getting a little frayed." At this critical point,
Slessor presented a compromise policy to Portal that
amounted to a breakthrough.
Actually, the Combined Chiefs were not that far apart,
but Slessor got to the heart of the problem. "The
real trouble was that Americans obviously felt that
we were concentrating all our interest and attention
on defeating Germany and didn't care a damn about Japan,
while our Chiefs of Staff suspected that the Americans
intended to build up a tremendous campaign in the Pacific
to the serious prejudice of our ability to defeat Germany," he
said.
Slessor based his compromise proposal on Eaker's concept
of an intensive strategic bombing campaign. The RAF
would bomb at night, and the AAF would pound away during
the day. He also suggested postponing a decision on
the invasion of Europe.
With few alterations, the CCOS accepted this proposal.
On Jan. 21, 1943, the Combined Chiefs formally promulgated
the Casablanca Directive, setting out a combined bomber
offensive. Addressed to Eighth Air Force and RAF Bomber
Command, the directive outlined the major objective
of the bomber offensive as "the progressive destruction
of the German military industrial and economic system,
and the undermining of the morale of the German people
to a point where their armed resistance is fatally
weakened."

Eighth Air Force commander Ira Eaker (here as lieutenant general) was
key to overcoming British opposition to the AAF strategic air campaign.
Churchill said Eaker convinced him "with skill and tenacity."
|
Eighth's Orders
Of seven points the Combined Chiefs emphasized in
the directive, they aimed one specifically at Eaker's
Eighth Air Force: "You should take every opportunity
to attack Germany by day, to destroy objectives that
are unsuitable for night attack, to sustain continuous
pressure on German morale, to impose heavy losses on
the German fighter force, and to contain German fighter
strength away from the Russian and Mediterranean theaters
of war." The Chiefs also directed the Eighth to
provide the Allied armies, when they re-entered the
continent, "all possible support in the manner
most effective."
The Casablanca Directive described primary targets
as submarine construction yards and bases, the aircraft
industry, transportation, oil, and other industries.
The immediate top priority was the Nazi submarine fleet,
which was taking an enormous toll on Allied shipping
and imperiled the entire Allied offensive in the west.
Subsequently, in June 1943, the Combined Chiefs approved
the so-called "Point-blank Directive." That
directive pinpointed fighter aircraft production as
a major target and designated a complex that, if badly
damaged, would help make the planned Allied invasion
a success.
The Combined Chiefs deliberately had crafted the Casablanca
Directive to allow both the AAF and RAF sufficient
flexibility to pursue their own bombing doctrines and,
at the same time, set the stage for a cross-channel
strike.
However, the final overall 1943 strategy amounted
to a victory for the British Mediterranean strategy.
The Allies would invade Sicily next, followed by the
effort to knock Italy out of the war. Preparations
in England would continue for the cross-channel strike,
but the invasion was on hold--a blow to the American
strategy championed by Marshall.
Although the conference "was more or less a rat
race, out of it I think there is a definite understanding
between the British and ourselves as to the conduct
of the war in future," said Arnold. For starters,
Arnold emphasized to Eaker the absolute importance
of starting to attack targets in Germany. By the end
of January, Eaker had sent the first Eighth Air Force
bombing mission over Germany.
After Casablanca, Arnold wrote to Spaatz: "You
and Ira were both a great help to me at Casablanca.
I don't know what I would have done without you."
The question of whether the Army Air Forces would
continue daylight bombing was settled, allowing the
strategic air campaign to go ahead and intensify.
The Casablanca Directive was "one of the finest
air documents of the entire war," emphasized Maj.
Gen. Haywood S. Hansell Jr., one of the AAF's outstanding
war planners. In retrospect, Hansell concluded, if
the AAF been forced into night bombing, the entire
course of the war might have been different. It would
certainly have been almost impossible to defeat the
Luftwaffe, and the success of the Normandy invasion
would have been jeopardized.
The decision at Casablanca marked the beginning of
the end for Nazi Germany.
Herman S. Wolk is senior historian in the Air Force
History Support Office. He is the author of the Struggle
for Air Force Independence, 1943-1947 (1997), and a
coauthor of Winged Shield, Winged Sword: A History
of the United States Air Force (1997). His most
recent article for Air Force Magazine,
"American
Chieftains," appeared in the September 2002
issue.
Copyright Air Force Association. All rightsreserved.
|