|
In the gallery of controversial Western military airmen, a few names
truly stand out. At the top of this list is Bomber Harris.
Sir Arthur Travers Harris, Marshal of the Royal Air Force, was
the head of RAF Bomber Command in the period 1942 through 1945.
During that time, the RAF dropped almost a million tons of bombs.
Half fell on German cities.
Harris is forever linked with images of the destruction of German
cultural landmarks. His outspoken advocacy of razing German cities
and winning the war with bomber offensives made him a polarizing
public figure even during that all-out, no-holds-barred fight to
the finish.
Those World War II exploits have echoed far beyond 1945. When admirers
erected a statue of Harris in London in 1992, mobs of protesters
took to the streets in both Britain and Germany.
 |
| RAF Air Marshal Harris and
Royal Navy officials go over plans to use RAF bombers to drop
mines. Bomber Harris is at the top of the list of controversial
World War II airmen. (Photo by Leonard McCombe/Picture Post/Getty
Images) |
The fact that Harris was a stern wartime commander only added to
his reputation.
Harris was incapable of deploying guile, diplomacy, or charm
as weapons in his armory, and his approach was always direct to
the point of rudeness, said Sebastian Cox, who edited Harris
long-classified postwar Despatch for publication in 1995.
No one doubts that Harris was hard to take, but one cannot give
a fair assessment without putting his actions in the proper context.
His night-fighting fleets overcame poor equipment and training and
pioneered such essentials of modern warfare as electronic countermeasures
(ECM).
On the other hand, Harris also opposed the diversion of airpower
to support the Normandy invasion, downplayed the need to bomb the
German V-2 missile sites, and supported wide-area bombing of German
cities with high explosives and incendiaries right through to the
end of the war.
In a New Light
Harris record is worth a reconsideration, however. For one
thing, he faced major challenges building up the kind of Bomber
Command that could produce such impressive operational resultsincluding
surprisingly effective support for land force operations in the
last year of the war. Perhaps no airman had ever been given a more
difficult job: to create from scarce resources a bomber force that
would be the one sure means of taking the war directly to Nazi Germany.
That was Harris task from 1942 to 1945.
Harris was born in Cheltenham in 1892. His father was a civil servant
in India. His mother was the daughter of an Army physician in Madras.
Harris lived five years with his parents in India and then was sent
to school in England. At age 18, he left school to make his career
in Rhodesia. When Harris arrived in 1910, the British colony was
rapidly expanding. Harris spent four years working on farms until,
in 1914, general war broke out in Europe.
Harris shipped out for the World War with a Rhodesian regiment,
but, through an uncle, found his way into the Royal Flying Corps.
Two weeks in the cockpit won him a pilots license and an officers
appointment. Ten more hours of flying time at Upavon, over a two-month
period, earned him full qualification in January 1916 and an assignment
to the air base at Northolt to learn night flying against German
Zeppelins.
 |
| Harris visits with airmen at
one of his units in 1943. He overcame major challenges to build
Bomber Command into a force that could take the war to Nazi
Germany. (Photo by Central Press/Getty Images) |
The young Harris thrived in the dangerous night-flying environment.
By September 1916, he was in command of a fighter squadron headed
for France. However, 1916 was a difficult time for British aviators
facing superior German Fokker monoplanes and pilots. By October
1916, Harris was on his way back home with a broken arm, an injury
suffered during a crash landing.
He returned to the front in the summer of 1917 in time for the
muddy stalemates at Passchendaele and Ypres. Harris became an ace
that summer. Dogfighting over the trench lines left him with the
impression that if another war did occur, there must surely
be a better way to fight it, according to recent Harris biographer
Henry Probert.
Assignments in India, Iraq, Egypt, and on the Air Ministry staff
followed. In the late 1930s, Harris made several trips to America
in a liaison capacity and met Henry H. Hap Arnold, Ira
C. Eaker, and other senior air leaders. He took charge of RAF 5
Group in September 1939, at the outset of World War II, and spent
the wars first year improving the operational status of his
bomber squadrons.
Harris set up formal training units, harped on maintenance, and
chided RAF Fighter Command for its tendency to inadvertently shoot
at friendly bombers.
In November 1940, he became deputy chief of the air staff, but
he soon was off to Washington again, this time as head of the RAF
delegation buying aircraft and arranging pilot training. He arrived
in June 1941 and 10 days later found himself conferring with President
Franklin D. Roosevelt at the White House after Nazi Germany, on
June 22, invaded the Soviet Union.
In Washington, Harris befriended not only national leaders such
as Roosevelt and Gen. George C. Marshall but also airmen such as
Adm. John H. Towers, who offered a training facility in Florida
for British pilots, and Jacqueline Cochrane, who volunteered her
services as a ferry pilot.
Where We Start
Harris and his wife were in Washington when a shocked America received
word of imperial Japans sneak attack on Pearl Harbor. Harris
resisted the pleas of Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson to cancel
some RAF contracts and divert the materiel to US armed forces. When
Assistant Secretary for Air Robert A. Lovett pointed out that the
US Pacific Fleet was in dire straits, Harris had a calm reply: So
what? A few days later, after hearing more grim news, he would
simply say to Lovett, This is where we start.
In February 1942, Harris returned to England as head of RAF Bomber
Command. It was not a formidable force. Far from it. During
the early months of the war, Harris wrote in Despatch, Bomber
Command activities were limited to spasmodic attacks on enemy shipping
on certain naval installations, and no strategic bombing of German
targets took place.
 |
| Photo at top shows how successive
RAF and US bomber strikes wrecked the vital Nazi rail center
in Cologne. |
An August 1941 report to Prime Minister Winston Churchills
War Cabinet used starker terms to criticize Bomber Commands
performance to that point. Only one in every three bomber sorties
produced attacks coming within five miles of the target, and many
bombers were simply dropping their strings in the open countryside.
Bomber Command in 1942 had on its books only 51 squadrons of about
20 bombers each. Moreover, 27 percent of the fleet was nonoperational
due to re-equipping. (By spring 1945, Harris would have 108 squadrons
with a nonoperational rate of less than one percent.)
Most of Bomber Commands aircraft were ill-suited for carrying
heavy ordnance loads on deep raids. Harris counted 378 serviceable
aircraft with crews, of which 69 were heavy bombers. Not a single
Lancasterthe four-engine mainstay of the later war yearswas
yet on operational status.
Bomber Command competed for resources with Fighter Command, always
far ahead in procurement priorities, and Coastal Command, which
had bomber squadrons dedicated to English Channel activity and to
the guarding of sea-lanes. Even so, Bomber Command was obligated
to carrying out the sea mining mission. Harris backed it, but the
mission ate into the forces he could assemble to attack Germany.
It took a while for his new command to make its mark.
Harris own postwar report put Bomber Commands 1942
accuracy against German cities (Berlin excluded) at an average of
just 33 percent. Only fair-weather raids countedand accuracy
was defined as bomb release within three miles of the aim point.
Bomber Command, despite shortcomings, was essential to Britains
war. In early 1942, the only thing grimmer than the feeble status
of RAF Bomber Command was Britains strategic position. It
was still waging a war of national survival. The triumphs in North
Africa were months away, and the Normandy invasion was more than
two years in the future. Britain had no means of taking the war
to Germany itself except for long-range bombing. With the Russians
losing ground in the east, mounting stronger bomber offensives was
also the only thing Britain could do to aid its new Soviet ally.
The strategic, political, and moral climate called for action.
Born in the Blitz
With its prosecution of the Blitz against England, Germany already
had set the precedent for all-out war. London was ablaze for 76
nights in a row in the fall of 1940. Churchill called for an
absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers
from this country upon the Nazi homeland. In 1941, Britain
approved Air Staff policy that the RAF would seek to make German
towns physically uninhabitable and to keep people conscious
of constant personal danger.
To Harris, Bomber Command was the only means at the disposal
of the Allies for striking at Germany itself and, as such, stood
out as the central point in the Allied offensive strategy.
First, however, he had to conduct what he later called a
complete revolution in the employment no less than in the composition
of the bomber force.
 |
| Above, Bomber Command aircrews
stream across an RAF airfield after a successful raid on Berlin.
|
His most powerful ally in the quest to build up Bomber Command
was none other than Churchill. By this time, the Prime Minister
was warning the Air Staff not to place unbounded confidence
in any one means of attack, but Churchill believed bombing Germany
was the most potent method of impairing the enemys morale
we can use at the present time.
Churchill was fond of inviting commanders to late-night dinners
throughout the war. Harris used the social opportunities to build
Churchills trust, but he shrewdly condensed important war
business and lobbying for bomber procurement into memoranda known
as minutes so that Churchill could review and act on
them.
At Bomber Commands High Wycombe headquarters, Harris proved
quite the host to numerous visitors up to and including the
King. He kept his American contacts closeso close that Eaker,
commander of Eighth Air Force, was a houseguest of the Harrises
for several months.
Harris was at heart an operational commander. He was briefed every
morning on results and crew losses from the previous nights
raids, and his main daily task was overall command of the bomber
formations. Weather in England varied so much that targets often
were not confirmed until late morning for a launch later that night.
Harris routine was to select targets and then leave remaining
operational details to deputies, who would brief him on final plans
for the raids.
Harris was a field commander in every sense of the wordresponsible
for execution decisions as well as all administrative tasks. For
most of the war, he reported directly to the US-British Combined
Chiefs of Staff, a status reserved for the likes of Eisenhower,
MacArthur, and Nimitz.
No to Precision
He had the power to determine Bomber Commands tactics and
strategy. Painful early experiences with precision attacks convinced
him that such raids were not feasible. One example was the Augsburg
raid of April 17, 1942, in which Harris sent 12 Lancaster bombers
to attack a U-boat engine factory in Germany. Penetrating precision
in World War II was possible, but it required daylight and extremely
low-level ingress. Of the 12 Lancasters sent against the target,
only five returned.
Clearly, Bomber Command could not regularly sustain nearly 60 percent
attrition in every raid.
For most of 1942, Harris deliberately scaled back operations over
Europe to concentrate on giving his crews better training. Moreover,
1942 and 1943 also brought a windfall of sophisticated technology.
New radar navigation aids provided beam navigation and, later, electronic
mapping of target areas. Among these systems, the biggest star was
an item called H2S, which yielded excellent reproduction of
coastlines and inland waterways and far better resolution of towns
and built-up areas, thus facilitating accurate identification,
wrote Group Capt. Dudley Saward, Harris chief radar officer
at Bomber Command.
 |
| The Americans Eaker (left)
and Spaatz (center) exchange pleasantries with Harris in Britain.
Harris forged close ties with American airmen, who often shared
his views on airpower tactics and strategy. (© Hulton-Deutsch
Collection/CORBIS) |
These British scientific outpourings gave Bomber Command a higher
degree of reliability in target acquisition.
Still, Harris favored night bombing, because German air defenses
were thick and strong. He believed in massed raids for the same
reason. In his view, raids of at least 300 bombers would improve
survivability by saturating radar-controlled anti-aircraft guns
and German night fighters, which were equipped with cockpit radar
sets. Serial raids of 700 to 800 bombers were preferred.
To Harris, city bombing was a tactical necessity with strategic
payoff. He believed it kept alive the spark of hope, and therefore
of resistance, among the workers of occupied Europe. Moreover,
according to Despatch, city bombing impeded German war production
and operational maneuver. For example, Harris concluded that attacks
on the Reich cities compelled Germany to draw back versatile anti-aircraft
guns and fighters from the front and helped the Allies achieve air
superiority.
Bomber Commands main offensive ran from March
1943 through March 1944. The Oboe navigation aid, with
its 300-mile range, made possible the Battle of the Ruhr. US Army
Air Forces picked up the day bombing missions in strength.
H2S debuted in the summer of 1943, and Bomber Commands sortie
rates shot up. Still, Harris considered the H2S to be incapable
of really precise marking, meaning that, in his view, area
bombing was still the only option.
At the end of July 1943, the RAF deployed Windowthe first
chaff ECMduring a series of heavy raids on Hamburg.
Overall, Harris was pleased. For the first time, the command
found itself in a position, under suitable conditions, to inflict
severe material damage on almost any industrial center in Germany.
Errors of Judgment
When Harris had finally molded Bomber Command into an efficient
organization for massed night bomber raids, he wanted to use his
crews for nothing else. This led in 1943 and 1944 to errors of judgment
that are hard to explain away.
One problem was his antipathy toward targeting German industry
outside of the city industrial areas. To Harris, it was a piecemeal
approach unlikely to yield results. I do not believe in panacea
targets, e.g., oil, rubber, ball bearings, Harris wrote in
April 1943. Specializing on one such [industry] means that
the enemy concentrates all his defenses, and nothing else in Germany,
including morale and housing, is likely to suffer.
At least in the beginning, Harris took little interest in the planned
invasion of Normandy. He resisted placing Bomber Command under Eisenhowers
operational control. Along with Spaatz, Harris had doubts about
whether Ikes plan to use airpower to choke and channel German
movement would work. He argued that his night-bombing crews were
not trained to go after railway-type targets.
Harris worried that the Allies made an irremediable error
by diverting our best weapon from the military function for
which it has been equipped and trained to that which it cannot effectively
carry out.
 |
| Critics questioned the morality
of city bombing, but Harris maintained that, if his command
had been at full strength earlier, his bombing strategy could
have ended the war without a massive land invasion. (©
Hulton-Deutsch Collection /CORBIS) |
Allied politics and concerns over French casualties deepened the
dispute. By late March, it had become so bitter that Eisenhower
threatened to resign his command unless the strategic air forces
came over to his control. Ultimately, they did, with both Eighth
Air Force and Bomber Command chopped to Eisenhower from mid-April
to August 1944.
Having lost the battle, Harris threw himself and his command into
helping win the war, and, ultimately, he wrote with pride of Bomber
Commands contributions to D-Day success. By D-Day, all
37 of the railway centers assigned to Bomber Command had been damaged
to such an extent that no further attention from heavy bombers was
deemed necessary, Harris wrote.
Proud Nonetheless
In October 1945, Harris wrote, The best indication of the
success of the three months offensive against the railways
is the fact that the enemys major reinforcements reached the
battlefront too late to prevent the firm establishment of the invading
armies in Normandy. When they did percolate through to the front,
they found themselves operating in conditions of extreme disadvantage.
When it was all over, Eisenhower let Harris off with no hard feelings.
He later wrote in his memoirs, Even Harris, who had originally
been known as the individual who wanted to win the war with bombing
alone, [became] extremely proud of his membership in the Allied
team.
Harris also willingly continued close support for the land campaign.
Bomber Command sent 1,000 sorties to break a British deadlock with
German Panzers at Caen, France, on July 18, 1944. In October, he
dedicated 243 of his precious Lancasters to breaching operations
off the coast of the Netherlands at the Walcheren Island fortress,
another thorn in the side of the Allies.
During the Battle of the Bulge in December 1944, his bombers attacked
the St. Vith road junction, rerouting a German division on its way
to reinforce Bastogne, Belgium. Late March 1945 found Bomber Command
crews attacking railways, bridges, and enemy troop concentrations
as 21st Army Group crossed the Rhine. Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomerys
message extended to Harris what he called my grateful appreciation
for the quite magnificent cooperation you have given us in the Battle
of the Rhine.
Harris, by this time, had enough bombers and crews at his disposal
to both support Eisenhower and wage all-out war on German cities.
Released from Ikes control in August, Bomber Command resumed
city attacks with full force. In November 1944, RAF crews delivered
347,538 tons of bombsexceeding the total of 339,179 tons dropped
in all of 1942.
Statistically, it was an epic performance. Bomber Command sorties
soared from an average of fewer than 2,000 per month in 1939-41
to 3,161 in 1942, 5,422 in 1943, 13,904 in 1944, and 16,871 in early
1945.
Using vast quantities of incendiary bombs, Bomber Command aircraft
targeted cities such as Cologne in thousand-bomber raids.
The February 1945 attack on Dresden crippled that historic city,
making it one of the most controversial episodes of World War II.
(See The Dresden Legend, October 2004, p. 64.)
Questions about the morality of city bombing have remained the
sticking point in the reputation of Harris, not that it bothered
him. He maintained that, if only Bomber Command had been at full
strength a year or so earlier, it undoubtedly would have ended the
war in Europe as abruptly as US bombing ended the war in the Pacificwithout
need of a land invasion.
Harris passionate commitment to nighttime area bombing does
not fit well in this age of precision airpower. It was almost as
unpopular in the 1940s. History began to treat him badly right away.
Clement Attlees Labor government denied him a peerage, even
though his two predecessors at Bomber Command got them. Harris had
to wait for Churchills return to power before he could become
Sir Arthur.
After the war, he enjoyed almost 40 years of business success and
contact with old colleagues until his death in 1984.
Harris well-known blind spots have tended to bar him in many
assessments from membership in the top ranks of airmen. Yet those
who would judge him might do well to remember that Harris was an
airman who saw London on fire from end to end on the night of Dec.
29, 1940. Only the dome of St. Pauls near the Air Ministry
offices stood out untouched against the flames and smoke. To Harris,
Bomber Command was the only weapon that could strike back. History
has reason to treat Harris with caution, but final judgment is best
left to those who saw what he saw.
Rebecca Grant is a contributing editor of Air Force Magazine. She is president of IRIS Independent Research in Washington, D.C., and has worked for Rand, the Secretary of the Air Force, and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force. Grant is a fellow of the Eaker Institute for Aerospace Concepts, the public policy and research arm of the Air Force Association’s Aerospace Education Foundation. Her most recent article, “Air Warfare in Transition,” appeared in the December 2004 issue.
Copyright Air Force Association. All rights reserved.
|