By By James W. Canan, Senior Editor
Cruise missiles, launched by US warships in the Red Sea and
the Persian Gulf and aimed at faraway command and communications
centers, were the first weapons to strike Iraq. Then, in quick
succession, came the stealthy F-117A attack fighters. Engines
muted, they slipped through enemy air-defense radars and bombed
airfields and missile sites.
Operation Desert Storm had begun, set off by an air campaign
that would soon prove unprecedented in its intensity, precision,
and lethality. Never before in war had so many air forces and
aircraft worked together so well and with such telling effect.
Air traffic control--directing and coordinating the steady
streams of multiservice, multinational, combat and support aircraft
in and around Iraqi and Kuwaiti airspace--was enough in itself
to bend the mind. All went smoothly, thanks to US Central Command's
air tasking order and to the proficiency of allied pilots in
executing it.
That ATO, drawn up by US Air Force Lt. Gen. Charles A. "Chuck"
Horner, USCENTCOM's air commander, was the blueprint for the
allied air campaign. It held up from the start.
Thirty-six hours into Operation Desert Storm, General Horner
declared, "We've worked hard to bring together this very
complex, very large campaign plan. We've been able to integrate
all our forces because we all fly off a common air tasking order."
Success in the air came swiftly and was sustained. Gen. H.
Norman Schwarzkopf, Commander in Chief of USCENTCOM and of the
US-led coalition of forces, credited General Horner as having
been 'the architect of our air campaign" and called him
"a superb leader."
Despite a brief lull and a temporary letdown caused by bad
weather, the allied air campaign appeared to improve as it went
along. Two weeks into it, General Schwarzkopf claimed "air
supremacy" for the coalition throughout the region. He said
his air forces had flown more than 30,000 sorties, averaging
more than 2,000 a day, and had lost only nineteen aircraft, all
to ground fire (most of it from guns, not missiles) or in accidents.
"We've destroyed twenty-nine Iraqi fighter aircraft with
not one single air-to- air loss on the part of the coalition,"
General Schwarzkopf asserted. He added that "not a single
Iraqi aircraft has penetrated the coalition airspace since this
war began."
Said the CINC, "In the last three days alone, F-15s have
shot down nine MiG-23s and Mirage F.1s. The Iraqi early warning
system has completely failed, and their aircraft have been caught
totally by surprise when we attacked them,"
"Relentless" Attack
General Schwarzkopf claimed that "relentless" allied
air attacks had destroyed or severely damaged most of Iraq's
primary command, control, and communications facilities and air
defense systems. As a result, he said, the Iraqis "have
been forced to switch to backup [C3] systems [that are] far less
effective and more easily targeted," and they "have
abandoned centralized control of their air defense within Iraq
and Kuwait."
This, he said, was "a very important point," because
"it accounts, in part, for the very, very low attrition
rate of coalition aircraft." .
He emphasized that "pilot skills also account for that
low attrition rate."
Desert Storm's dazzling demonstration of those skills under
fire is part of a larger revelation: The Pentagon has made better
decisions, and has spent its money more wisely, than it may have
been given credit for.
Skillful pilots are a big part of the Pentagon's payoff. They
are the products of smart recruiting, solid instruction, and
realistic training in exercises approximating actual combat.
The Air Force has put a premium on all such endeavors in recent
times.
Desert Shield's triumphant air campaign was clearly a tribute
to Pentagon systems-acquisition policies and programs as well,
with emphasis on the Air Force role. Put to the test, aircraft
and other systems performed superbly. They also proved to be
rugged. Keeping them fit to fly and fight posed no major problems.
USAF's combat aircraft, averaging three tough sorties every day,
sustained an astounding mission capable rate of close to ninety
percent.
Desert Storm also made a case for advanced technology. The
air war left no doubt that advanced technology is conducive to--not
at odds with--the durability and reliability of aircraft and
their ancillary systems. The war may have discredited, once and
for all, criticisms that the Pentagon wastes money on weapons
that cost too much, don't work, or don't hold up.
The early days of Desert Storm were seen as validation of
the Air Force's stated policy of "global reach, global power."
In striking that theme, the Air Force never claimed that airpower
can do it all, only that it can do an awful lot and that little
else is possible without it.
Desert Storm soon made the point. By itself, airpower may
not have been enough to dislodge Saddam Hussein's forces from
Kuwait, but it surely was needed to soften them up, and it did
so.
Skirting the Holy Places
Choosing targets and coordinating attacks on them in this
Mideast war--a war that General Horner described as, "in
some respects, a technology war, although fought by men and women"-were
tasks complicated by humane considerations. His mandate, he noted,
was to "avoid any damage to civilian targets and to the
holy shrines that happen to be located in Iraq."
He continued, "We've looked at every target from the
outset for avenues of approach, the exact type of weapon to cause
damage to the target but [to] preclude damage to the surrounding
area, and precision delivery."
Early on, General Homer's headquarters provided eye-popping
examples of such delivery. Videotapes from TV cameras aboard
F-117s and F-111 s showed the planes' laser-guided bombs hitting
such targets as a runway, a missile storage building, and "my
counterpart's headquarters in Baghdad" right on the money,
with no collateral damage to civilian facilities.
General Horner described the planning of the air campaign
as "an enormous effort" made possible by "a lot
of computers [to] bring together the tens of thousands of minute
details--radio frequencies, altitudes, tanker rendezvous, bomb
configurations, who supports whom, who's flying escort."
He added, "There are just thousands and thousands of
such details, and we work them together as one group, put them
together in what we call a common air tasking order." He
likened that ATO to "a sheet of music" from which "everyone
sings the same song."
The ATO was the master plan for interservice and cross-national
teamwork. "We've been able to execute because we've trained
very hard," the air commander said. "You'll find sorties
where a Saudi aircraft will drop bombs escorted by an American
fighter and supported by other aircraft from [other] countries."
He related a recent example: Saudi Tornados, escorted by USAF
fighters and supported by Navy EA-6B electronic countermeasures
aircraft, had taken out a vital runway just across the Saudi
border in Iraq.
"The types of aircraft we have in this campaign have
been the key to its success," General Horner declared. "There's
no doubt that our air defense and our awareness of what's going
on in the air battlefield are a result, in large measure, of
what the AWACS provides us and of the defense that aircraft such
as the F-14 and the F-15 provide our forces."
Mission planning was the key to applying airpower in Desert
Storm. The near-perfection of that planning was evident right
from the start.
On the first night, as the Tomahawks headed for their targets,
a four-ship flight of F-15Cs took off from their base in northeastern
Saudi Arabia. They headed north, followed by other Eagle flights,
to fly cover for the ground-attack aircraft, electronic warfare
planes, and defense-suppression aircraft even then marshaling
for missions into Iraq and Kuwait.
Imagery from an Air Force F-117A Stealth fighter taken at the
outset of Desert Storm shows a doomed Iraqi air defense headquarters
building caught in the aircraft's sighting cross during a precision
bombing run. The dark spot in the upper right quadrant of the
sighting cross is the entry point of a bomb dropped moments earlier
by a preceding aircraft.
The F-15Es Swoop In
Only minutes after the first waves of Tomahawks and F-117As
had taken enemy defenders by surprise, F-15Es armed with Mk.
82 and Mk. 84 iron bombs, cluster bombs, and runway-cratering
bombs swooped into Iraq and Kuwait. To the south and west, B-52s
were forming up after long flights from Diego Garcia over the
Indian Ocean and all the way from Barksdale AFB, La., to pound
Iraqi ground forces and facilities in Kuwait with an assortment
of bombs, including parabraked M117s. AWACS planes shepherded
the bombers. F-15Cs flew cover. Meanwhile, Air Force EF-111 Raven
and EC-130 Compass Call electronic countermeasures planes, in
concert with Navy EA-6B Prowlers, had moved into their assigned
sectors of coverage to make life easier for aircrews on the attack.
With F-15Cs flying combat air patrol and F-4G Wild Weasels
clearing the way through enemy fire-control radars, the first
full-up Air Force strike package, with F-15Es and F-111Fs in
the forefront, penetrated Iraqi airspace. As the F-4Gs egressed,
Navy F/A-18s also armed with radar-homing AGM-88 HARM missiles,
ingressed to take over for them.
Before the night was through, the allied air assault would
involve virtually every type of Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps
combat aircraft deployed in the region through the previous five
months, following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait on August 2. Army
attack helicopters also came into play as part of special operations.
Over the next fourteen hours, without letup, the allied air
arms of the US-led international coalition arrayed against Iraq
flew more than 1,000 sorties. They would improve on that pace
and intensity, averaging more than 2,000 sorties--half combat,
half support-- every twenty-four hours, with time out for a short
stretch of bad weather, through the days and weeks to come.
US Central Command's headquarters in Saudi Arabia disclosed
the makeup of the coalition attack force on that first night
of the air campaign. The Air Force accounted for 530 of the attack
aircraft, the Navy and Marines for ninety, Britain for twenty-four,
and France and Saudi Arabia for twelve each.
The coalition attack force also included US Air Force, US
Navy, Saudi, and Canadian counterair fighters and interceptors;
US Air Force, US Navy, and British airborne warning and control
aircraft; and US Air Force and British tankers. Rounding it out
were aircraft of at least one service or nation devoted to such
missions as electronic warfare, suppression of enemy air defenses
(SEAD), and tactical reconnaissance. The latter mission also
involved the Navy's ship-launched Pioneer unmanned aerial vehicles
(UAVs).
"The main thing we always try to do," explained
an Air Force official, "is to take advantage of surprise
and mass--to mass our air assets at specific locations at certain
times to overwhelm the defenses, generate the necessary destruction,
and egress. We apply the mass and set the timing of each successive
wave--or force package--so that each complements the job done
by the one that went before."
This view from a KC-135R shows a Marine Corps F/A-18 fighter
being refueled by the Air Force tanker over the Persian Gulf.
Air Force, Nave Marine. and Army aircraft worked together in
grand style, along with planes of several other nations, to rule
the air and rain bombs on enemy forces and facilities in Operation
Desert Storm. (USN photo by TSgt. Perry Heimer)
A Clockwork Operation
Timing is everything, "clockwork" the byword. TOT--time
over target--of attack elements is a matter of only a minute
or so. Aircraft must adhere to "deconflicting" flight
paths, altitudes, and airspace boundaries while ingressing and
egressing target zones in profusion and in rapid succession.
"You don't commit all assets in one wave," an official
explained. "You like to hit targets with three to five waves,
each of them, perhaps, with different types of airplanes, each
ingressing and egressing in different locations. The idea is
to make it difficult or impossible for the defenders to comprehend
what's hitting them and where it's coming from."
In Desert Storm's early days of drumfire air assaults, the
number and types of airplanes in each allied force package tended
to remain constant from sortie to sortie against certain kinds
of targets. Individual pilots and planes in those packages changed
identities. Pilots rotated among cockpits. Planes were allocated
"downtime." All schedules were aimed at keeping flyers
fresh and aircraft mission capable.
Allied attack aircraft reportedly averaged three sorties every
twenty-four hours. More often than not, each plane was flown
by two different pilots and around the clock. Rotation of cockpit
assignments depended on how far planes and crews had to fly to
and from targets and on how tough the flying and fighting turned
out to be. "Pilots striking downtown Baghdad on four-hour
sorties may have flown only once a night," one source said.
The master plan for all that was the common air tasking order,
the ATO, mentioned by General Horner earlier -a 600-page computer
printout revised and redistributed daily to all air combat and
support outfits.
General Schwarzkopf saw fit to enunciate the aims of the ATO.
"In our first phase," he said, "we wanted to
disrupt leadership command and control; destroy centralized air
defense command and control; attack combat aircraft in the air
and on the ground to achieve air superiority; damage chemical,
biological, and nuclear storage and production capability; and
commence attack on Republican Guards [elite Iraqi troops in northern
Kuwait and just north of the Kuwait-Iraq border].
"Once we had that done, we planned to go into a second
phase, which was to destroy the air defense radars and missiles
in the Kuwaiti theater of operation to achieve undisputed control
of the air--some people call that air supremacy--and, finally,
to sever supply lines in [that] theater. . . .
"Once that phase was completed we planned then to isolate
the Kuwait; theater of operations, continue our attacks on the
Republican Guards--and we have other objectives, which I will
not discuss further."
Smacking the Airfields
The fundamental soundness and adaptability of the ATO became
apparent as the bombing of enemy airfields went on and on, day
after day. Allied air planners had targeted sixteen primary Iraqi
airfields and twenty- eight dispersal airfields. Over two weeks,
with time out for bad weather, allied planes flew more than 1,300
sorties against thirty-eight of those airfields, struck many
of them at least four times, and put nine irreparably out of
operation.
Ground-hugging British Tornado attack fighters armed with
JP-233 cluster bombs accounted for a great deal of the damage
to airfields and took relatively heavy losses early on. "We
never had any intention to render all of the airfields inoperable,"
General Schwarzkopf explained. "Our intention is to render
the [Iraqi] Air Force ineffective.
This happened fast. More than two dozen Iraqi warplanes, including
six Soviet-built Tu-16 "Badger" bombers and an Adnan
radar plane, were destroyed on the ground. The Iraqis took to
hiding their planes in hardened shelters, which became the objects
of "systematic destruction," General Schwarzkopf said.
Before long, seventy shelters had been blasted, and Iraqi aircraft
were "running out of places to hide:" said the CINC.
So the planes turned tail. .Within days, eighty-nine Iraqi
aircraft, including top-of-the-line MiG and Mirage fighters and
a warning-and-control radar plane, were flown out of harm's way
to safe havens in Iran, presumably for the duration of the war.
Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear warfare plants were
top targets on General Hornets ATO. Allied planes and ships mounted
535 sorties with Tomahawks and air-launched, precision guided
missiles against thirty-one plant sites.
SrA. Arthur Chestine of the 388th Aircraft Generation Squadron,
Hill AFB, Utah, drives a bomb lift load truck bearing cluster
bombs, a type heavilyused in aliied attacks on enemy airfields
and troop concentrations. Desert Storm's air campaign, averaging
2,000 sorties each day, set records for intensity, precision,
and lethality. (USN photo by TSgt.Marvin Lynchard)
"We have destroyed all of their nuclear facilities,"
said the commander in chief of the coalition forces two weeks
into the war. He reported that Baghdad Nuclear Research Center
"has been leveled to rubble" and that more than half
of the chemical and biological warfare plants "have been
severely damaged or totally destroyed." General Schwarzkopf
promised to "continue a relentless attack" on Iraq's
"heinous" chemical/biological weapons facilities.
As the coalition's warplanes intensified their firepower against
Iraqi ground forces in Kuwait, much of it directed at the Republican
Guards, the occupied by those forces took on the look of a moonscape.
B-52s from Diego Garcia and Jidda, Saudi Arabia, bombed the Iraqi
almost without letup.
Said General Schwarzkopf, "We're targeting the Republican
Guards with about 300 sorties a day. We're using very accurate
bombing even in bad weather. The many secondary explosions are
confirming that we're inflicting continuous damage on them."
In a typical day, twenty-seven B-52s dropped 455 tons of explosives
on the Republican Guards, "not to mention the other strikes
that we're doing with F-16s F-15Es, A-6s etc.," the commanding
General said.
In one fifteen-hour stretch, such bombing destroyed 178 trucks,
destroyed or damaged fifty-five artillery pieces and fifty-two
tanks, and caused "heavy secondary explosions from revetments
and fires all over the area," including spectacular pyrotechnics
from the explosion of 125 storage revetments "in the largest
ammo storage area" in northern Kuwait, the CINC said.
He emphasized that allied planes were "attacking very
close in to our [ground forces] positions, with over 300 sorties
a day." He noted, for example, that Marine Corps F/A-18s
and Air Force A-10s in the course of one day, had destroyed at
least fifty-four armored personnel carriers, eight tanks, a half-dozen
self-propelled artillery pieces, and numerous FROG (free rocket
over ground) missiles and heavy-equipment transports.
He tipped his cap to the Navy for its "great job in supporting
the air campaign." Through the first two weeks of the war,
General Schwarzkopf said, the Navy flew 3,500 sorties from six
aircraft carriers and launched more than 260 Tomahawks. The Navy
also took to launching SLAMS--Standoff Land-Attack Missiles,
a version of the AGM-84 Harpoon antiship missile that was in
advanced development when the war began and that the Navy rushed
into operation.
Though flexible, the allied air plan was never freewheeling.
Everything about it had long since been thought through, organized,
and coordinated. General Schwarzkopf set the objectives for the
campaign last August, even before the massive US deployment to
the Mideast in Operation Desert Shield. As the CINC worked up
his strategy for the campaign to drive Iraqi forces out of Kuwait,
General Horner got down to details about the air campaign.
There was nothing impromptu about the air commander's plan.
He had known for quite some time that it might be needed. At
CENTCOM headquarters, MacDill AFB, Fla., and in Air Staff plans
and operations circles at the Pentagon, an Iraqi invasion of
Kuwait had long ranked at or near the top of contingencies likely
to confront the US in the post-cold war world.
General Horner and his staff had wide latitude. After the
war began, he attributed the early success of the air campaign
largely to "the freedom with which we've been able to plan
it." Apart from "stringent guidance with regard to
civilian damage and things of that nature," he had been
given a free hand to "plan a very efficient military campaign,"
he said.
There were no mysteries about how to do it. The basic elements
of the plan were the same as in any war and in such exercises
as Red Flag. The whole idea is always to establish air superiority--and
preferably air supremacy, which means uncontested control of
the air-and then to destroy the enemy's offensive capabilities
and roll back its defensive forces.
Gen. Colin Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
summed up: "The military objective that we set out to accomplish
. . . is simply to eject the Iraqi army from Kuwait."
How? "First we're going to cut it off, and then we're
going to kill it," General Powell declared.
Copyright Air Force Association.
All rights reserved